Cargando…

Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed?

The question whether evolution is blind is usually presented as a choice between no goals at all (‘the blind watchmaker’) and long-term goals which would be external to the organism, for example in the form of special creation or intelligent design. The arguments either way do not address the questi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noble, Raymond, Noble, Denis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology6040047
_version_ 1783288905601122304
author Noble, Raymond
Noble, Denis
author_facet Noble, Raymond
Noble, Denis
author_sort Noble, Raymond
collection PubMed
description The question whether evolution is blind is usually presented as a choice between no goals at all (‘the blind watchmaker’) and long-term goals which would be external to the organism, for example in the form of special creation or intelligent design. The arguments either way do not address the question whether there are short-term goals within rather than external to organisms. Organisms and their interacting populations have evolved mechanisms by which they can harness blind stochasticity and so generate rapid functional responses to environmental challenges. They can achieve this by re-organising their genomes and/or their regulatory networks. Epigenetic as well as DNA changes are involved. Evolution may have no foresight, but it is at least partially directed by organisms themselves and by the populations of which they form part. Similar arguments support partial direction in the evolution of behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5745452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57454522018-01-02 Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed? Noble, Raymond Noble, Denis Biology (Basel) Review The question whether evolution is blind is usually presented as a choice between no goals at all (‘the blind watchmaker’) and long-term goals which would be external to the organism, for example in the form of special creation or intelligent design. The arguments either way do not address the question whether there are short-term goals within rather than external to organisms. Organisms and their interacting populations have evolved mechanisms by which they can harness blind stochasticity and so generate rapid functional responses to environmental challenges. They can achieve this by re-organising their genomes and/or their regulatory networks. Epigenetic as well as DNA changes are involved. Evolution may have no foresight, but it is at least partially directed by organisms themselves and by the populations of which they form part. Similar arguments support partial direction in the evolution of behavior. MDPI 2017-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5745452/ /pubmed/29261138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology6040047 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Noble, Raymond
Noble, Denis
Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed?
title Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed?
title_full Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed?
title_fullStr Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed?
title_full_unstemmed Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed?
title_short Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed?
title_sort was the watchmaker blind? or was she one-eyed?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology6040047
work_keys_str_mv AT nobleraymond wasthewatchmakerblindorwassheoneeyed
AT nobledenis wasthewatchmakerblindorwassheoneeyed