Cargando…
Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center
BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs (ERP) includes multimodal approaches of perioperative patient’s clinical pathways designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a decreased length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: This observational study evaluated the implementation of ERP...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9 |
_version_ | 1783288959311282176 |
---|---|
author | Lambaudie, Eric de Nonneville, Alexandre Brun, Clément Laplane, Charlotte N’Guyen Duong, Lam Boher, Jean-Marie Jauffret, Camille Blache, Guillaume Knight, Sophie Cini, Eric Houvenaeghel, Gilles Blache, Jean-Louis |
author_facet | Lambaudie, Eric de Nonneville, Alexandre Brun, Clément Laplane, Charlotte N’Guyen Duong, Lam Boher, Jean-Marie Jauffret, Camille Blache, Guillaume Knight, Sophie Cini, Eric Houvenaeghel, Gilles Blache, Jean-Louis |
author_sort | Lambaudie, Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs (ERP) includes multimodal approaches of perioperative patient’s clinical pathways designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a decreased length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: This observational study evaluated the implementation of ERP in gynaecologic oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques (MIT) expert center with more than 85% of procedures done with MIT. We compared a prospective cohort of 100 patients involved in ERP between December 2015 and June 2016 to a 100 patients control group, without ERP, previously managed in the same center between April 2015 and November 2015. All the included patients were referred for hysterectomy and/or pelvic or para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gynaecological cancer. The primary objective was to achieve a significant decrease of median LOS in the ERP group. Secondary objectives were decreases in proportion of patients achieving target LOS (2 days), morbidity and readmissions. RESULTS: Except a disparity in oncological indications with a higher proportion of endometrial cancer in the group with ERP vs. the group without ERP (42% vs. 22%; p = 0.003), there were no differences in patient’s characteristics and surgical procedures. ERP were associated with decreases of median LOS (2.5 [0 to 11] days vs. 3 [1 to 14] days; p = 0.002) and proportion of discharged patient at target LOS (45% vs. 24%; p = 0.002). Morbidities occurred in 25% and 26% in the groups with and without ERP and readmission rates were respectively of 6% and 8%, without any significant difference. CONCLUSION: ERP in gynaecologic oncological surgery is associated with a decrease of LOS without increases of morbidity or readmission rates, even in a center with a high proportion of MIT. Although it is already widely accepted that MIT improves early recovery, our study shows that the addition of ERP’s clinical pathways improve surgical outcomes and patient care management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5745717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57457172018-01-03 Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center Lambaudie, Eric de Nonneville, Alexandre Brun, Clément Laplane, Charlotte N’Guyen Duong, Lam Boher, Jean-Marie Jauffret, Camille Blache, Guillaume Knight, Sophie Cini, Eric Houvenaeghel, Gilles Blache, Jean-Louis BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs (ERP) includes multimodal approaches of perioperative patient’s clinical pathways designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a decreased length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: This observational study evaluated the implementation of ERP in gynaecologic oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques (MIT) expert center with more than 85% of procedures done with MIT. We compared a prospective cohort of 100 patients involved in ERP between December 2015 and June 2016 to a 100 patients control group, without ERP, previously managed in the same center between April 2015 and November 2015. All the included patients were referred for hysterectomy and/or pelvic or para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gynaecological cancer. The primary objective was to achieve a significant decrease of median LOS in the ERP group. Secondary objectives were decreases in proportion of patients achieving target LOS (2 days), morbidity and readmissions. RESULTS: Except a disparity in oncological indications with a higher proportion of endometrial cancer in the group with ERP vs. the group without ERP (42% vs. 22%; p = 0.003), there were no differences in patient’s characteristics and surgical procedures. ERP were associated with decreases of median LOS (2.5 [0 to 11] days vs. 3 [1 to 14] days; p = 0.002) and proportion of discharged patient at target LOS (45% vs. 24%; p = 0.002). Morbidities occurred in 25% and 26% in the groups with and without ERP and readmission rates were respectively of 6% and 8%, without any significant difference. CONCLUSION: ERP in gynaecologic oncological surgery is associated with a decrease of LOS without increases of morbidity or readmission rates, even in a center with a high proportion of MIT. Although it is already widely accepted that MIT improves early recovery, our study shows that the addition of ERP’s clinical pathways improve surgical outcomes and patient care management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5745717/ /pubmed/29282059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lambaudie, Eric de Nonneville, Alexandre Brun, Clément Laplane, Charlotte N’Guyen Duong, Lam Boher, Jean-Marie Jauffret, Camille Blache, Guillaume Knight, Sophie Cini, Eric Houvenaeghel, Gilles Blache, Jean-Louis Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center |
title | Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center |
title_full | Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center |
title_fullStr | Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center |
title_short | Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center |
title_sort | enhanced recovery after surgery program in gynaecologic oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambaudieeric enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT denonnevillealexandre enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT brunclement enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT laplanecharlotte enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT nguyenduonglam enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT boherjeanmarie enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT jauffretcamille enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT blacheguillaume enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT knightsophie enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT cinieric enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT houvenaeghelgilles enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter AT blachejeanlouis enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter |