Cargando…

Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs (ERP) includes multimodal approaches of perioperative patient’s clinical pathways designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a decreased length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: This observational study evaluated the implementation of ERP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambaudie, Eric, de Nonneville, Alexandre, Brun, Clément, Laplane, Charlotte, N’Guyen Duong, Lam, Boher, Jean-Marie, Jauffret, Camille, Blache, Guillaume, Knight, Sophie, Cini, Eric, Houvenaeghel, Gilles, Blache, Jean-Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9
_version_ 1783288959311282176
author Lambaudie, Eric
de Nonneville, Alexandre
Brun, Clément
Laplane, Charlotte
N’Guyen Duong, Lam
Boher, Jean-Marie
Jauffret, Camille
Blache, Guillaume
Knight, Sophie
Cini, Eric
Houvenaeghel, Gilles
Blache, Jean-Louis
author_facet Lambaudie, Eric
de Nonneville, Alexandre
Brun, Clément
Laplane, Charlotte
N’Guyen Duong, Lam
Boher, Jean-Marie
Jauffret, Camille
Blache, Guillaume
Knight, Sophie
Cini, Eric
Houvenaeghel, Gilles
Blache, Jean-Louis
author_sort Lambaudie, Eric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs (ERP) includes multimodal approaches of perioperative patient’s clinical pathways designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a decreased length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: This observational study evaluated the implementation of ERP in gynaecologic oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques (MIT) expert center with more than 85% of procedures done with MIT. We compared a prospective cohort of 100 patients involved in ERP between December 2015 and June 2016 to a 100 patients control group, without ERP, previously managed in the same center between April 2015 and November 2015. All the included patients were referred for hysterectomy and/or pelvic or para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gynaecological cancer. The primary objective was to achieve a significant decrease of median LOS in the ERP group. Secondary objectives were decreases in proportion of patients achieving target LOS (2 days), morbidity and readmissions. RESULTS: Except a disparity in oncological indications with a higher proportion of endometrial cancer in the group with ERP vs. the group without ERP (42% vs. 22%; p = 0.003), there were no differences in patient’s characteristics and surgical procedures. ERP were associated with decreases of median LOS (2.5 [0 to 11] days vs. 3 [1 to 14] days; p = 0.002) and proportion of discharged patient at target LOS (45% vs. 24%; p = 0.002). Morbidities occurred in 25% and 26% in the groups with and without ERP and readmission rates were respectively of 6% and 8%, without any significant difference. CONCLUSION: ERP in gynaecologic oncological surgery is associated with a decrease of LOS without increases of morbidity or readmission rates, even in a center with a high proportion of MIT. Although it is already widely accepted that MIT improves early recovery, our study shows that the addition of ERP’s clinical pathways improve surgical outcomes and patient care management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5745717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57457172018-01-03 Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center Lambaudie, Eric de Nonneville, Alexandre Brun, Clément Laplane, Charlotte N’Guyen Duong, Lam Boher, Jean-Marie Jauffret, Camille Blache, Guillaume Knight, Sophie Cini, Eric Houvenaeghel, Gilles Blache, Jean-Louis BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs (ERP) includes multimodal approaches of perioperative patient’s clinical pathways designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a decreased length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: This observational study evaluated the implementation of ERP in gynaecologic oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques (MIT) expert center with more than 85% of procedures done with MIT. We compared a prospective cohort of 100 patients involved in ERP between December 2015 and June 2016 to a 100 patients control group, without ERP, previously managed in the same center between April 2015 and November 2015. All the included patients were referred for hysterectomy and/or pelvic or para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gynaecological cancer. The primary objective was to achieve a significant decrease of median LOS in the ERP group. Secondary objectives were decreases in proportion of patients achieving target LOS (2 days), morbidity and readmissions. RESULTS: Except a disparity in oncological indications with a higher proportion of endometrial cancer in the group with ERP vs. the group without ERP (42% vs. 22%; p = 0.003), there were no differences in patient’s characteristics and surgical procedures. ERP were associated with decreases of median LOS (2.5 [0 to 11] days vs. 3 [1 to 14] days; p = 0.002) and proportion of discharged patient at target LOS (45% vs. 24%; p = 0.002). Morbidities occurred in 25% and 26% in the groups with and without ERP and readmission rates were respectively of 6% and 8%, without any significant difference. CONCLUSION: ERP in gynaecologic oncological surgery is associated with a decrease of LOS without increases of morbidity or readmission rates, even in a center with a high proportion of MIT. Although it is already widely accepted that MIT improves early recovery, our study shows that the addition of ERP’s clinical pathways improve surgical outcomes and patient care management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5745717/ /pubmed/29282059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lambaudie, Eric
de Nonneville, Alexandre
Brun, Clément
Laplane, Charlotte
N’Guyen Duong, Lam
Boher, Jean-Marie
Jauffret, Camille
Blache, Guillaume
Knight, Sophie
Cini, Eric
Houvenaeghel, Gilles
Blache, Jean-Louis
Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center
title Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center
title_full Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center
title_fullStr Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center
title_short Enhanced recovery after surgery program in Gynaecologic Oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center
title_sort enhanced recovery after surgery program in gynaecologic oncological surgery in a minimally invasive techniques expert center
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0332-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lambaudieeric enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT denonnevillealexandre enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT brunclement enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT laplanecharlotte enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT nguyenduonglam enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT boherjeanmarie enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT jauffretcamille enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT blacheguillaume enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT knightsophie enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT cinieric enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT houvenaeghelgilles enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter
AT blachejeanlouis enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramingynaecologiconcologicalsurgeryinaminimallyinvasivetechniquesexpertcenter