Cargando…

Outcome of breast cancer screening in Denmark

BACKGROUND: In Denmark, national roll-out of a population-based, screening mammography program took place in 2007–2010. We report on outcome of the first four biennial invitation rounds. METHODS: Data on screening outcome were retrieved from the 2015 and 2016 national screening quality reports. We c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lynge, Elsebeth, Bak, Martin, von Euler-Chelpin, My, Kroman, Niels, Lernevall, Anders, Mogensen, Nikolaj Borg, Schwartz, Walter, Wronecki, Adam Jan, Vejborg, Ilse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3929-6
_version_ 1783288970039263232
author Lynge, Elsebeth
Bak, Martin
von Euler-Chelpin, My
Kroman, Niels
Lernevall, Anders
Mogensen, Nikolaj Borg
Schwartz, Walter
Wronecki, Adam Jan
Vejborg, Ilse
author_facet Lynge, Elsebeth
Bak, Martin
von Euler-Chelpin, My
Kroman, Niels
Lernevall, Anders
Mogensen, Nikolaj Borg
Schwartz, Walter
Wronecki, Adam Jan
Vejborg, Ilse
author_sort Lynge, Elsebeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Denmark, national roll-out of a population-based, screening mammography program took place in 2007–2010. We report on outcome of the first four biennial invitation rounds. METHODS: Data on screening outcome were retrieved from the 2015 and 2016 national screening quality reports. We calculated coverage by examination; participation after invitation; detection-, interval cancer- and false-positive rates; cancer characteristics; sensitivity and specificity, for Denmark and for the five regions. RESULTS: At the national level coverage by examination remained at 75–77%; lower in the Capital Region than in the rest of Denmrk. Detection rate was slightly below 1% at first screen, 0.6% at subsequent screens, and one region had some fluctuation over time. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) constituted 13–14% of screen-detected cancers. In subsequent rounds, 80% of screen-detected invasive cancers were node negative and 40% ≤10 mm. False-positive rate was around 2%; higher for North Denmark Region than for the rest of Denmark. Three out of 10 breast cancers in screened women were diagnosed as interval cancers. CONCLUSIONS: High coverage by examination and low interval cancer rate are required for screening to decrease breast cancer mortality. Two pioneer local screening programs starting in the 1990s were followed by a decrease in breast cancer mortality of 22–25%. Coverage by examination and interval cancer rate of the national program were on the favorable side of values from the pioneer programs. It appears that the implementation of a national screening program in Denmark has been successful, though regional variations need further evaluation to assure optimization of the program. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3929-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5745763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57457632018-01-03 Outcome of breast cancer screening in Denmark Lynge, Elsebeth Bak, Martin von Euler-Chelpin, My Kroman, Niels Lernevall, Anders Mogensen, Nikolaj Borg Schwartz, Walter Wronecki, Adam Jan Vejborg, Ilse BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: In Denmark, national roll-out of a population-based, screening mammography program took place in 2007–2010. We report on outcome of the first four biennial invitation rounds. METHODS: Data on screening outcome were retrieved from the 2015 and 2016 national screening quality reports. We calculated coverage by examination; participation after invitation; detection-, interval cancer- and false-positive rates; cancer characteristics; sensitivity and specificity, for Denmark and for the five regions. RESULTS: At the national level coverage by examination remained at 75–77%; lower in the Capital Region than in the rest of Denmrk. Detection rate was slightly below 1% at first screen, 0.6% at subsequent screens, and one region had some fluctuation over time. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) constituted 13–14% of screen-detected cancers. In subsequent rounds, 80% of screen-detected invasive cancers were node negative and 40% ≤10 mm. False-positive rate was around 2%; higher for North Denmark Region than for the rest of Denmark. Three out of 10 breast cancers in screened women were diagnosed as interval cancers. CONCLUSIONS: High coverage by examination and low interval cancer rate are required for screening to decrease breast cancer mortality. Two pioneer local screening programs starting in the 1990s were followed by a decrease in breast cancer mortality of 22–25%. Coverage by examination and interval cancer rate of the national program were on the favorable side of values from the pioneer programs. It appears that the implementation of a national screening program in Denmark has been successful, though regional variations need further evaluation to assure optimization of the program. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3929-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5745763/ /pubmed/29282034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3929-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lynge, Elsebeth
Bak, Martin
von Euler-Chelpin, My
Kroman, Niels
Lernevall, Anders
Mogensen, Nikolaj Borg
Schwartz, Walter
Wronecki, Adam Jan
Vejborg, Ilse
Outcome of breast cancer screening in Denmark
title Outcome of breast cancer screening in Denmark
title_full Outcome of breast cancer screening in Denmark
title_fullStr Outcome of breast cancer screening in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of breast cancer screening in Denmark
title_short Outcome of breast cancer screening in Denmark
title_sort outcome of breast cancer screening in denmark
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3929-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lyngeelsebeth outcomeofbreastcancerscreeningindenmark
AT bakmartin outcomeofbreastcancerscreeningindenmark
AT voneulerchelpinmy outcomeofbreastcancerscreeningindenmark
AT kromanniels outcomeofbreastcancerscreeningindenmark
AT lernevallanders outcomeofbreastcancerscreeningindenmark
AT mogensennikolajborg outcomeofbreastcancerscreeningindenmark
AT schwartzwalter outcomeofbreastcancerscreeningindenmark
AT wroneckiadamjan outcomeofbreastcancerscreeningindenmark
AT vejborgilse outcomeofbreastcancerscreeningindenmark