Cargando…

Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections

BACKGROUND: Voriconazole has been used in the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) while its wide use was limited by some frequent adverse events, especially neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and even renal disruption. The aim of this study was to comprehensively compare vorico...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xing, Yuanming, Chen, Lu, Feng, Yan, Zhou, Yan, Zhai, Yajing, Lu, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29281997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2913-8
_version_ 1783288995791241216
author Xing, Yuanming
Chen, Lu
Feng, Yan
Zhou, Yan
Zhai, Yajing
Lu, Jun
author_facet Xing, Yuanming
Chen, Lu
Feng, Yan
Zhou, Yan
Zhai, Yajing
Lu, Jun
author_sort Xing, Yuanming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Voriconazole has been used in the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) while its wide use was limited by some frequent adverse events, especially neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and even renal disruption. The aim of this study was to comprehensively compare voriconazole-induced toxicity, including tolerability, neurotoxicity, visual toxicity, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity with the composite of other antifungals commonly used in clinic. METHODS: Bibliography databases were searched to select randomized controlled trials providing information about the incidence of toxicity referred above. A total of 4122 patients from 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of individual types of toxicity showed that there was a significant difference between voriconazole and the composite of other antifungal agents. The primary outcome, the tolerability of voriconazole was slightly inferior (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.21–2.40, P = 0.002) and it is noteworthy that the probabilities of neurotoxicity and visual toxicity were around twice higher and six-fold for voriconazole compared with the counterpart (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.05–3.75, P = 0.03 and OR = 6.50, 95% CI = 2.93–14.41, P < 0.00001, respectively). Hepatotoxicity was more common in voriconazole group (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.17–2.19, P = 0.003) whereas its pooled risk of nephrotoxicity was about half of the composite of other five antifungal agents (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.26–0.84, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our analysis has revealed differences in multiple types of toxicity induced by VRC versus other antifungals and quantified the corresponding pooled risks, which could provide an alternative for patients with a certain antifungal intolerance and help the clinician to select the optimal intervention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-017-2913-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5745890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57458902018-01-03 Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections Xing, Yuanming Chen, Lu Feng, Yan Zhou, Yan Zhai, Yajing Lu, Jun BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Voriconazole has been used in the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) while its wide use was limited by some frequent adverse events, especially neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and even renal disruption. The aim of this study was to comprehensively compare voriconazole-induced toxicity, including tolerability, neurotoxicity, visual toxicity, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity with the composite of other antifungals commonly used in clinic. METHODS: Bibliography databases were searched to select randomized controlled trials providing information about the incidence of toxicity referred above. A total of 4122 patients from 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of individual types of toxicity showed that there was a significant difference between voriconazole and the composite of other antifungal agents. The primary outcome, the tolerability of voriconazole was slightly inferior (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.21–2.40, P = 0.002) and it is noteworthy that the probabilities of neurotoxicity and visual toxicity were around twice higher and six-fold for voriconazole compared with the counterpart (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.05–3.75, P = 0.03 and OR = 6.50, 95% CI = 2.93–14.41, P < 0.00001, respectively). Hepatotoxicity was more common in voriconazole group (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.17–2.19, P = 0.003) whereas its pooled risk of nephrotoxicity was about half of the composite of other five antifungal agents (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.26–0.84, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our analysis has revealed differences in multiple types of toxicity induced by VRC versus other antifungals and quantified the corresponding pooled risks, which could provide an alternative for patients with a certain antifungal intolerance and help the clinician to select the optimal intervention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-017-2913-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5745890/ /pubmed/29281997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2913-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xing, Yuanming
Chen, Lu
Feng, Yan
Zhou, Yan
Zhai, Yajing
Lu, Jun
Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections
title Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections
title_full Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections
title_short Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections
title_sort meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29281997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2913-8
work_keys_str_mv AT xingyuanming metaanalysisofthesafetyofvoriconazoleindefinitiveempiricalandprophylactictherapiesforinvasivefungalinfections
AT chenlu metaanalysisofthesafetyofvoriconazoleindefinitiveempiricalandprophylactictherapiesforinvasivefungalinfections
AT fengyan metaanalysisofthesafetyofvoriconazoleindefinitiveempiricalandprophylactictherapiesforinvasivefungalinfections
AT zhouyan metaanalysisofthesafetyofvoriconazoleindefinitiveempiricalandprophylactictherapiesforinvasivefungalinfections
AT zhaiyajing metaanalysisofthesafetyofvoriconazoleindefinitiveempiricalandprophylactictherapiesforinvasivefungalinfections
AT lujun metaanalysisofthesafetyofvoriconazoleindefinitiveempiricalandprophylactictherapiesforinvasivefungalinfections