Cargando…

Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation

BACKGROUND: Every safety-critical industry devotes considerable time and resource to investigating and analysing accidents, incidents and near misses. The systematic analysis of incidents has greatly expanded our understanding of both the causes and prevention of harm. These methods have been widely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vincent, Charles, Carthey, Jane, Macrae, Carl, Amalberti, Rene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0695-4
_version_ 1783289000968060928
author Vincent, Charles
Carthey, Jane
Macrae, Carl
Amalberti, Rene
author_facet Vincent, Charles
Carthey, Jane
Macrae, Carl
Amalberti, Rene
author_sort Vincent, Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Every safety-critical industry devotes considerable time and resource to investigating and analysing accidents, incidents and near misses. The systematic analysis of incidents has greatly expanded our understanding of both the causes and prevention of harm. These methods have been widely employed in healthcare over the last 20 years but are now subject to critique and reassessment. In this paper, we reconsider the purpose and value of incident analysis and methods appropriate to the healthcare of today. MAIN TEXT: The primary need for a revised vision of incident analysis is that healthcare itself is changing dramatically. People are living longer, often with multiple co-morbidities which are managed over very long timescales. Our vision of safety analysis needs to expand concomitantly to embrace much longer timescales. Rather than think only in terms of the prevention of specific incidents, we need to consider the balance of benefit, harm and risks over long time periods encompassing the social and psychological impact of healthcare as well as physical effects. We argued for major changes in our approach to the analysis of safety events: assume that patients and families will be partners in investigation and where possible engage them fully from the beginning, examine much longer time periods and assess contributory factors at different time points in the patient journey, be more proportionate and strategic in analysing safety issues, seek to understand success and recovery as well as failure, consider the workability of clinical processes as well as deviations from them and develop a much more structured and wide-ranging approach to recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Previous methods of incident analysis were simply adopted and disseminated with little research into the concepts, methods, reliability and outcomes of such analyses. There is a need for significant research and investment in the development of new methods. These changes are profound and will require major adjustments in both practical and cultural terms and research to explore and evaluate the most effective approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5745912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57459122018-01-03 Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation Vincent, Charles Carthey, Jane Macrae, Carl Amalberti, Rene Implement Sci Debate BACKGROUND: Every safety-critical industry devotes considerable time and resource to investigating and analysing accidents, incidents and near misses. The systematic analysis of incidents has greatly expanded our understanding of both the causes and prevention of harm. These methods have been widely employed in healthcare over the last 20 years but are now subject to critique and reassessment. In this paper, we reconsider the purpose and value of incident analysis and methods appropriate to the healthcare of today. MAIN TEXT: The primary need for a revised vision of incident analysis is that healthcare itself is changing dramatically. People are living longer, often with multiple co-morbidities which are managed over very long timescales. Our vision of safety analysis needs to expand concomitantly to embrace much longer timescales. Rather than think only in terms of the prevention of specific incidents, we need to consider the balance of benefit, harm and risks over long time periods encompassing the social and psychological impact of healthcare as well as physical effects. We argued for major changes in our approach to the analysis of safety events: assume that patients and families will be partners in investigation and where possible engage them fully from the beginning, examine much longer time periods and assess contributory factors at different time points in the patient journey, be more proportionate and strategic in analysing safety issues, seek to understand success and recovery as well as failure, consider the workability of clinical processes as well as deviations from them and develop a much more structured and wide-ranging approach to recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Previous methods of incident analysis were simply adopted and disseminated with little research into the concepts, methods, reliability and outcomes of such analyses. There is a need for significant research and investment in the development of new methods. These changes are profound and will require major adjustments in both practical and cultural terms and research to explore and evaluate the most effective approaches. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5745912/ /pubmed/29282080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0695-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Vincent, Charles
Carthey, Jane
Macrae, Carl
Amalberti, Rene
Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation
title Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation
title_full Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation
title_fullStr Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation
title_full_unstemmed Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation
title_short Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation
title_sort safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0695-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentcharles safetyanalysisovertimesevenmajorchangestoadverseeventinvestigation
AT cartheyjane safetyanalysisovertimesevenmajorchangestoadverseeventinvestigation
AT macraecarl safetyanalysisovertimesevenmajorchangestoadverseeventinvestigation
AT amalbertirene safetyanalysisovertimesevenmajorchangestoadverseeventinvestigation