Cargando…

A pilot study to understand feasibility and acceptability of stool and cord blood sample collection for a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort

BACKGROUND: Few data are available to guide biological sample collection around the time of birth for large-scale birth cohorts. We are designing a large UK birth cohort to investigate the role of infection and the developing immune system in determining future health and disease. We undertook a pil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, S. R., Townsend, C. L., Dent, H., Mallet, C., Tsaliki, E., Riley, E. M., Noursadeghi, M., Lawley, T. D., Rodger, A. J., Brocklehurst, P., Field, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1627-7
_version_ 1783289016079089664
author Bailey, S. R.
Townsend, C. L.
Dent, H.
Mallet, C.
Tsaliki, E.
Riley, E. M.
Noursadeghi, M.
Lawley, T. D.
Rodger, A. J.
Brocklehurst, P.
Field, N.
author_facet Bailey, S. R.
Townsend, C. L.
Dent, H.
Mallet, C.
Tsaliki, E.
Riley, E. M.
Noursadeghi, M.
Lawley, T. D.
Rodger, A. J.
Brocklehurst, P.
Field, N.
author_sort Bailey, S. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few data are available to guide biological sample collection around the time of birth for large-scale birth cohorts. We are designing a large UK birth cohort to investigate the role of infection and the developing immune system in determining future health and disease. We undertook a pilot to develop methodology for the main study, gain practical experience of collecting samples, and understand the acceptability of sample collection to women in late pregnancy. METHODS: Between February–July 2014, we piloted the feasibility and acceptability of collecting maternal stool, baby stool and cord blood samples from participants recruited at prolonged pregnancy and planned pre-labour caesarean section clinics at University College London Hospital. Participating women were asked to complete acceptability questionnaires. RESULTS: Overall, 265 women were approached and 171 (65%) participated, with ≥1 sample collected from 113 women or their baby (66%). Women had a mean age of 34 years, were primarily of white ethnicity (130/166, 78%), and half were nulliparous (86/169, 51%). Women undergoing planned pre-labour caesarean section were more likely than those who delivered vaginally to provide ≥1 sample (98% vs 54%), but less likely to provide maternal stool (10% vs 43%). Pre-sample questionnaires were completed by 110/171 women (64%). Most women reported feeling comfortable with samples being collected from their baby (<10% uncomfortable), but were less comfortable about their own stool (19% uncomfortable) or a vaginal swab (24% uncomfortable). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to collect a range of biological samples from women around the time of delivery, and this was acceptable for most women. These data inform study design and protocol development for large-scale birth cohorts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1627-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5745976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57459762018-01-03 A pilot study to understand feasibility and acceptability of stool and cord blood sample collection for a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort Bailey, S. R. Townsend, C. L. Dent, H. Mallet, C. Tsaliki, E. Riley, E. M. Noursadeghi, M. Lawley, T. D. Rodger, A. J. Brocklehurst, P. Field, N. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Few data are available to guide biological sample collection around the time of birth for large-scale birth cohorts. We are designing a large UK birth cohort to investigate the role of infection and the developing immune system in determining future health and disease. We undertook a pilot to develop methodology for the main study, gain practical experience of collecting samples, and understand the acceptability of sample collection to women in late pregnancy. METHODS: Between February–July 2014, we piloted the feasibility and acceptability of collecting maternal stool, baby stool and cord blood samples from participants recruited at prolonged pregnancy and planned pre-labour caesarean section clinics at University College London Hospital. Participating women were asked to complete acceptability questionnaires. RESULTS: Overall, 265 women were approached and 171 (65%) participated, with ≥1 sample collected from 113 women or their baby (66%). Women had a mean age of 34 years, were primarily of white ethnicity (130/166, 78%), and half were nulliparous (86/169, 51%). Women undergoing planned pre-labour caesarean section were more likely than those who delivered vaginally to provide ≥1 sample (98% vs 54%), but less likely to provide maternal stool (10% vs 43%). Pre-sample questionnaires were completed by 110/171 women (64%). Most women reported feeling comfortable with samples being collected from their baby (<10% uncomfortable), but were less comfortable about their own stool (19% uncomfortable) or a vaginal swab (24% uncomfortable). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to collect a range of biological samples from women around the time of delivery, and this was acceptable for most women. These data inform study design and protocol development for large-scale birth cohorts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1627-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5745976/ /pubmed/29282072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1627-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bailey, S. R.
Townsend, C. L.
Dent, H.
Mallet, C.
Tsaliki, E.
Riley, E. M.
Noursadeghi, M.
Lawley, T. D.
Rodger, A. J.
Brocklehurst, P.
Field, N.
A pilot study to understand feasibility and acceptability of stool and cord blood sample collection for a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort
title A pilot study to understand feasibility and acceptability of stool and cord blood sample collection for a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort
title_full A pilot study to understand feasibility and acceptability of stool and cord blood sample collection for a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort
title_fullStr A pilot study to understand feasibility and acceptability of stool and cord blood sample collection for a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort
title_full_unstemmed A pilot study to understand feasibility and acceptability of stool and cord blood sample collection for a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort
title_short A pilot study to understand feasibility and acceptability of stool and cord blood sample collection for a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort
title_sort pilot study to understand feasibility and acceptability of stool and cord blood sample collection for a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1627-7
work_keys_str_mv AT baileysr apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT townsendcl apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT denth apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT malletc apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT tsalikie apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT rileyem apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT noursadeghim apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT lawleytd apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT rodgeraj apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT brocklehurstp apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT fieldn apilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT baileysr pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT townsendcl pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT denth pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT malletc pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT tsalikie pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT rileyem pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT noursadeghim pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT lawleytd pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT rodgeraj pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT brocklehurstp pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort
AT fieldn pilotstudytounderstandfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstoolandcordbloodsamplecollectionforalargescalelongitudinalbirthcohort