Cargando…
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews may provide less biased evidence than narrative reviews because they observe a strict methodology, similarly to primary studies. Hence, for clinical research questions, systematic reviews should be the study design of choice. It would be important to evaluate the preva...
Autores principales: | Faggion, Clovis Mariano, Bakas, Nikolaos P., Wasiak, Jason |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5746017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29281975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0453-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies
por: Hammel, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A new method for testing reproducibility in systematic reviews was developed, but needs more testing
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Reporting of flow diagrams in randomised controlled trials published in periodontology and implantology: a survey
por: Meyer, Hanns-Gustav Julius, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano
Publicado: (2015) -
Quality measures for dental care: A systematic review
por: Righolt, Amy Joyce, et al.
Publicado: (2018)