Cargando…

Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: No consensus treatment has been reached for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Hepatic resection (HR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been recommended as effective options, but which is better remains unclear. This meta-analysis is to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiu-Ping, Wang, Kang, Li, Nan, Zhong, Cheng-Qian, Wei, Xu-Biao, Cheng, Yu-Qiang, Gao, Yu-Zhen, Wang, Han, Cheng, Shu-Qun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5746018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3895-z
_version_ 1783289027089137664
author Zhang, Xiu-Ping
Wang, Kang
Li, Nan
Zhong, Cheng-Qian
Wei, Xu-Biao
Cheng, Yu-Qiang
Gao, Yu-Zhen
Wang, Han
Cheng, Shu-Qun
author_facet Zhang, Xiu-Ping
Wang, Kang
Li, Nan
Zhong, Cheng-Qian
Wei, Xu-Biao
Cheng, Yu-Qiang
Gao, Yu-Zhen
Wang, Han
Cheng, Shu-Qun
author_sort Zhang, Xiu-Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No consensus treatment has been reached for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Hepatic resection (HR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been recommended as effective options, but which is better remains unclear. This meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of HR and TACE for HCC with PVTT patients. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, VIP, Wan Fang, and Sino Med databases were systematically searched for comparing HR and TACE treating PVTT. RESULTS: Twelve retrospective studies with 3129 patients were included. A meta-analysis of 11 studies suggested that the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.41–0.57, I(2) = 37%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.12–0.38, I(2) = 43%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.28–0.44, I(2) = 53%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.14–0.54, I(2) = 72%, P = 0.0001, respectively) favored HR over TACE. In a subgroup analysis, HR had better 1-, 2-,3, 5-year OS for type I PVTT (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.17–0.64, I(2) = 20%, P = 0.001; OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.16–0.63, I2 = 0%, P = 0.001; OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.09–0.36, I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01–0.32, I2 = 0%, P = 0.0006, respectively) and better 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS for type II PVTT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.20–0.70, I(2) = 59%, P = 0.002; OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.13–0.39, I(2) = 0%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.03–0.91; I(2) = 51%, P = 0.04, respectively). There was no difference in 1-, 3-, or 5-year OS between HR and TACE for type III PVTT (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.61–1.21, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.39; OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.42–1.64, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.59; OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.06–-6.04, I(2) = 65%, P = 0.66, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HR may lead to longer OS for some selected HCC patients with PVTT than TACE, especially for type I or II PVTT, with less difference being observed for type III or IV PVTT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5746018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57460182018-01-03 Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Xiu-Ping Wang, Kang Li, Nan Zhong, Cheng-Qian Wei, Xu-Biao Cheng, Yu-Qiang Gao, Yu-Zhen Wang, Han Cheng, Shu-Qun BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: No consensus treatment has been reached for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Hepatic resection (HR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been recommended as effective options, but which is better remains unclear. This meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of HR and TACE for HCC with PVTT patients. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, VIP, Wan Fang, and Sino Med databases were systematically searched for comparing HR and TACE treating PVTT. RESULTS: Twelve retrospective studies with 3129 patients were included. A meta-analysis of 11 studies suggested that the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.41–0.57, I(2) = 37%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.12–0.38, I(2) = 43%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.28–0.44, I(2) = 53%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.14–0.54, I(2) = 72%, P = 0.0001, respectively) favored HR over TACE. In a subgroup analysis, HR had better 1-, 2-,3, 5-year OS for type I PVTT (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.17–0.64, I(2) = 20%, P = 0.001; OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.16–0.63, I2 = 0%, P = 0.001; OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.09–0.36, I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01–0.32, I2 = 0%, P = 0.0006, respectively) and better 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS for type II PVTT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.20–0.70, I(2) = 59%, P = 0.002; OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.13–0.39, I(2) = 0%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.03–0.91; I(2) = 51%, P = 0.04, respectively). There was no difference in 1-, 3-, or 5-year OS between HR and TACE for type III PVTT (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.61–1.21, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.39; OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.42–1.64, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.59; OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.06–-6.04, I(2) = 65%, P = 0.66, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HR may lead to longer OS for some selected HCC patients with PVTT than TACE, especially for type I or II PVTT, with less difference being observed for type III or IV PVTT. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5746018/ /pubmed/29282010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3895-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Xiu-Ping
Wang, Kang
Li, Nan
Zhong, Cheng-Qian
Wei, Xu-Biao
Cheng, Yu-Qiang
Gao, Yu-Zhen
Wang, Han
Cheng, Shu-Qun
Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5746018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3895-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiuping survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangkang survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linan survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhongchengqian survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weixubiao survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengyuqiang survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaoyuzhen survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghan survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengshuqun survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis