Cargando…
Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: No consensus treatment has been reached for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Hepatic resection (HR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been recommended as effective options, but which is better remains unclear. This meta-analysis is to c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5746018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3895-z |
_version_ | 1783289027089137664 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xiu-Ping Wang, Kang Li, Nan Zhong, Cheng-Qian Wei, Xu-Biao Cheng, Yu-Qiang Gao, Yu-Zhen Wang, Han Cheng, Shu-Qun |
author_facet | Zhang, Xiu-Ping Wang, Kang Li, Nan Zhong, Cheng-Qian Wei, Xu-Biao Cheng, Yu-Qiang Gao, Yu-Zhen Wang, Han Cheng, Shu-Qun |
author_sort | Zhang, Xiu-Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: No consensus treatment has been reached for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Hepatic resection (HR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been recommended as effective options, but which is better remains unclear. This meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of HR and TACE for HCC with PVTT patients. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, VIP, Wan Fang, and Sino Med databases were systematically searched for comparing HR and TACE treating PVTT. RESULTS: Twelve retrospective studies with 3129 patients were included. A meta-analysis of 11 studies suggested that the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.41–0.57, I(2) = 37%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.12–0.38, I(2) = 43%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.28–0.44, I(2) = 53%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.14–0.54, I(2) = 72%, P = 0.0001, respectively) favored HR over TACE. In a subgroup analysis, HR had better 1-, 2-,3, 5-year OS for type I PVTT (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.17–0.64, I(2) = 20%, P = 0.001; OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.16–0.63, I2 = 0%, P = 0.001; OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.09–0.36, I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01–0.32, I2 = 0%, P = 0.0006, respectively) and better 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS for type II PVTT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.20–0.70, I(2) = 59%, P = 0.002; OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.13–0.39, I(2) = 0%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.03–0.91; I(2) = 51%, P = 0.04, respectively). There was no difference in 1-, 3-, or 5-year OS between HR and TACE for type III PVTT (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.61–1.21, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.39; OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.42–1.64, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.59; OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.06–-6.04, I(2) = 65%, P = 0.66, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HR may lead to longer OS for some selected HCC patients with PVTT than TACE, especially for type I or II PVTT, with less difference being observed for type III or IV PVTT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5746018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57460182018-01-03 Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Xiu-Ping Wang, Kang Li, Nan Zhong, Cheng-Qian Wei, Xu-Biao Cheng, Yu-Qiang Gao, Yu-Zhen Wang, Han Cheng, Shu-Qun BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: No consensus treatment has been reached for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Hepatic resection (HR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been recommended as effective options, but which is better remains unclear. This meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of HR and TACE for HCC with PVTT patients. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, VIP, Wan Fang, and Sino Med databases were systematically searched for comparing HR and TACE treating PVTT. RESULTS: Twelve retrospective studies with 3129 patients were included. A meta-analysis of 11 studies suggested that the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.41–0.57, I(2) = 37%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.12–0.38, I(2) = 43%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.28–0.44, I(2) = 53%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.14–0.54, I(2) = 72%, P = 0.0001, respectively) favored HR over TACE. In a subgroup analysis, HR had better 1-, 2-,3, 5-year OS for type I PVTT (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.17–0.64, I(2) = 20%, P = 0.001; OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.16–0.63, I2 = 0%, P = 0.001; OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.09–0.36, I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01–0.32, I2 = 0%, P = 0.0006, respectively) and better 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS for type II PVTT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.20–0.70, I(2) = 59%, P = 0.002; OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.13–0.39, I(2) = 0%, P < 0.00001; OR = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.03–0.91; I(2) = 51%, P = 0.04, respectively). There was no difference in 1-, 3-, or 5-year OS between HR and TACE for type III PVTT (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.61–1.21, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.39; OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.42–1.64, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.59; OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.06–-6.04, I(2) = 65%, P = 0.66, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HR may lead to longer OS for some selected HCC patients with PVTT than TACE, especially for type I or II PVTT, with less difference being observed for type III or IV PVTT. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5746018/ /pubmed/29282010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3895-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Xiu-Ping Wang, Kang Li, Nan Zhong, Cheng-Qian Wei, Xu-Biao Cheng, Yu-Qiang Gao, Yu-Zhen Wang, Han Cheng, Shu-Qun Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5746018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3895-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxiuping survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangkang survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linan survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhongchengqian survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weixubiao survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chengyuqiang survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gaoyuzhen survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanghan survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chengshuqun survivalbenefitofhepaticresectionversustransarterialchemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomawithportalveintumorthrombusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |