Cargando…

Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity with aging is escalating alarmingly; and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are now becoming a growing epidemic among the elderly. Synthetic transvaginal mesh has been employed with increasing popularity in the treatment of POP and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fekete, Zoltán, Surányi, Andrea, Rénes, Lórand, Németh, Gábor, Kozinszky, Zoltan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5746023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2314-8
_version_ 1783289028249911296
author Fekete, Zoltán
Surányi, Andrea
Rénes, Lórand
Németh, Gábor
Kozinszky, Zoltan
author_facet Fekete, Zoltán
Surányi, Andrea
Rénes, Lórand
Németh, Gábor
Kozinszky, Zoltan
author_sort Fekete, Zoltán
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity with aging is escalating alarmingly; and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are now becoming a growing epidemic among the elderly. Synthetic transvaginal mesh has been employed with increasing popularity in the treatment of POP and is usually highly effective in controlling the principal symptoms of prolapse. However, studies have reported that mesh operations provide fairly unfavorable SUI cure rates. Therefore, additional anti-incontinence surgical strategies are increasingly being scrutinized to achieve better postoperative continence without any significant side-effects for patients with both POP and SUI. We hypothesize that the modification with the fixing of the mesh to the mid-urethra is superior to the original transvaginal mesh operation (TVM) with regard to anti-incontinence. METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients diagnosed with POP–Q II–III and concomitant SUI requiring surgical treatment will be included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either original TVM (TVM group, n = 65) or modified TVM surgery (mTVM group, n = 65). As the primary outcome parameter, we will evaluate the objective SUI and POP cure rates. Secondary endpoints include postoperative morbidity as assessed with the International Urogynaecological Association classification and subjective prolapse and incontinence cure rates reported by questionnaires. DISCUSSION: Recognizing the importance of an additional surgical procedure for anti-incontinence management, we aim to investigate whether a stabilizing suturing of the mesh to the mid-urethra delivers superior SUI correction compared to the original prosthesis surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02935803. Registered on 20 May 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2314-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5746023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57460232018-01-03 Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Fekete, Zoltán Surányi, Andrea Rénes, Lórand Németh, Gábor Kozinszky, Zoltan Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity with aging is escalating alarmingly; and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are now becoming a growing epidemic among the elderly. Synthetic transvaginal mesh has been employed with increasing popularity in the treatment of POP and is usually highly effective in controlling the principal symptoms of prolapse. However, studies have reported that mesh operations provide fairly unfavorable SUI cure rates. Therefore, additional anti-incontinence surgical strategies are increasingly being scrutinized to achieve better postoperative continence without any significant side-effects for patients with both POP and SUI. We hypothesize that the modification with the fixing of the mesh to the mid-urethra is superior to the original transvaginal mesh operation (TVM) with regard to anti-incontinence. METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients diagnosed with POP–Q II–III and concomitant SUI requiring surgical treatment will be included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either original TVM (TVM group, n = 65) or modified TVM surgery (mTVM group, n = 65). As the primary outcome parameter, we will evaluate the objective SUI and POP cure rates. Secondary endpoints include postoperative morbidity as assessed with the International Urogynaecological Association classification and subjective prolapse and incontinence cure rates reported by questionnaires. DISCUSSION: Recognizing the importance of an additional surgical procedure for anti-incontinence management, we aim to investigate whether a stabilizing suturing of the mesh to the mid-urethra delivers superior SUI correction compared to the original prosthesis surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02935803. Registered on 20 May 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2314-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5746023/ /pubmed/29282115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2314-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Fekete, Zoltán
Surányi, Andrea
Rénes, Lórand
Németh, Gábor
Kozinszky, Zoltan
Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades ii and iii: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5746023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2314-8
work_keys_str_mv AT feketezoltan efficacyofanchoringthefourarmtransvaginalmeshtothemidurethravsoriginalsurgeryasasurgicalcorrectionforstressurineincontinenceincoexistinganteriorvaginalprolapsegradesiiandiiistudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suranyiandrea efficacyofanchoringthefourarmtransvaginalmeshtothemidurethravsoriginalsurgeryasasurgicalcorrectionforstressurineincontinenceincoexistinganteriorvaginalprolapsegradesiiandiiistudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reneslorand efficacyofanchoringthefourarmtransvaginalmeshtothemidurethravsoriginalsurgeryasasurgicalcorrectionforstressurineincontinenceincoexistinganteriorvaginalprolapsegradesiiandiiistudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nemethgabor efficacyofanchoringthefourarmtransvaginalmeshtothemidurethravsoriginalsurgeryasasurgicalcorrectionforstressurineincontinenceincoexistinganteriorvaginalprolapsegradesiiandiiistudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kozinszkyzoltan efficacyofanchoringthefourarmtransvaginalmeshtothemidurethravsoriginalsurgeryasasurgicalcorrectionforstressurineincontinenceincoexistinganteriorvaginalprolapsegradesiiandiiistudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial