Cargando…

Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND: Pain after major lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a significant problem. A perineural catheter (PNC) can be placed adjacent to the major nerve at the time of amputation with a continuous local anaesthetic infusion given postoperatively to try and reduce pain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosanquet, David C., Ambler, Graeme K., Waldron, Cherry-Ann, Thomas-Jones, Emma, Brookes-Howell, Lucy, Kelson, Mark, Pickles, Tim, Harris, Debbie, Fitzsimmons, Deborah, Saxena, Neeraj, Twine, Christopher P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2357-x
_version_ 1783289216249102336
author Bosanquet, David C.
Ambler, Graeme K.
Waldron, Cherry-Ann
Thomas-Jones, Emma
Brookes-Howell, Lucy
Kelson, Mark
Pickles, Tim
Harris, Debbie
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Saxena, Neeraj
Twine, Christopher P.
author_facet Bosanquet, David C.
Ambler, Graeme K.
Waldron, Cherry-Ann
Thomas-Jones, Emma
Brookes-Howell, Lucy
Kelson, Mark
Pickles, Tim
Harris, Debbie
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Saxena, Neeraj
Twine, Christopher P.
author_sort Bosanquet, David C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain after major lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a significant problem. A perineural catheter (PNC) can be placed adjacent to the major nerve at the time of amputation with a continuous local anaesthetic infusion given postoperatively to try and reduce pain. Although low-quality observational data suggest that PNC usage reduces postoperative opioid requirements, there are limited data regarding its effect on pain. The aim of PLACEMENT is to explore the feasibility of running an effectiveness trial to assess the impact of a PNC with continuous local anaesthetic infusion, inserted at the time of amputation, on short and medium-term postoperative outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: Fifty patients undergoing a major lower limb amputation (below or above the knee) for PAD will be recruited from two centres. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive standard postoperative analgesia, with or without insertion of a PNC and local anaesthetic infusion for the first 5 postoperative days. Outcome data will be captured for the first 5 days, including pain scores (primary outcome, captured three times a day), opioid use, nausea or vomiting, itching, dizziness and complications. Patients will be contacted 2 and 6 months after surgery to assess quality of life, phantom limb pain, chronic stump pain and total healthcare costs. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with at least 10 patients (dependent on saturation of analytic themes on preliminary coding) purposefully sampled to achieve variation in site and study arm. Interviews will explore patients’ perception of post-amputation pain and its treatment, and experience of study processes. Semi-structured interviews with 5–10 health professionals will explore feasibility, fidelity, and acceptability of the study. Data from this pilot will be used to assess feasibility of, and estimate parameters to calculate the sample size for an effectiveness trial. Full ethical approval has been granted (Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 reference number 16/WA/0353). DISCUSSION: PLACEMENT will be the first study to explore the feasibility of running an effectiveness trial on PNC usage for postoperative pain in amputees, and provide parameters to calculate the appropriate sample size for this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com, ISRCTN85710690. Registered on 21 October 2016. European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), 2016-003544-37. Registered on 24 August 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2357-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5747086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57470862018-01-03 Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study Bosanquet, David C. Ambler, Graeme K. Waldron, Cherry-Ann Thomas-Jones, Emma Brookes-Howell, Lucy Kelson, Mark Pickles, Tim Harris, Debbie Fitzsimmons, Deborah Saxena, Neeraj Twine, Christopher P. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pain after major lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a significant problem. A perineural catheter (PNC) can be placed adjacent to the major nerve at the time of amputation with a continuous local anaesthetic infusion given postoperatively to try and reduce pain. Although low-quality observational data suggest that PNC usage reduces postoperative opioid requirements, there are limited data regarding its effect on pain. The aim of PLACEMENT is to explore the feasibility of running an effectiveness trial to assess the impact of a PNC with continuous local anaesthetic infusion, inserted at the time of amputation, on short and medium-term postoperative outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: Fifty patients undergoing a major lower limb amputation (below or above the knee) for PAD will be recruited from two centres. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive standard postoperative analgesia, with or without insertion of a PNC and local anaesthetic infusion for the first 5 postoperative days. Outcome data will be captured for the first 5 days, including pain scores (primary outcome, captured three times a day), opioid use, nausea or vomiting, itching, dizziness and complications. Patients will be contacted 2 and 6 months after surgery to assess quality of life, phantom limb pain, chronic stump pain and total healthcare costs. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with at least 10 patients (dependent on saturation of analytic themes on preliminary coding) purposefully sampled to achieve variation in site and study arm. Interviews will explore patients’ perception of post-amputation pain and its treatment, and experience of study processes. Semi-structured interviews with 5–10 health professionals will explore feasibility, fidelity, and acceptability of the study. Data from this pilot will be used to assess feasibility of, and estimate parameters to calculate the sample size for an effectiveness trial. Full ethical approval has been granted (Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 reference number 16/WA/0353). DISCUSSION: PLACEMENT will be the first study to explore the feasibility of running an effectiveness trial on PNC usage for postoperative pain in amputees, and provide parameters to calculate the appropriate sample size for this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com, ISRCTN85710690. Registered on 21 October 2016. European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), 2016-003544-37. Registered on 24 August 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2357-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5747086/ /pubmed/29284534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2357-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bosanquet, David C.
Ambler, Graeme K.
Waldron, Cherry-Ann
Thomas-Jones, Emma
Brookes-Howell, Lucy
Kelson, Mark
Pickles, Tim
Harris, Debbie
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Saxena, Neeraj
Twine, Christopher P.
Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study
title Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study
title_full Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study
title_fullStr Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study
title_short Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study
title_sort perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (placement): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2357-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bosanquetdavidc perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT amblergraemek perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT waldroncherryann perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT thomasjonesemma perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT brookeshowelllucy perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT kelsonmark perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT picklestim perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT harrisdebbie perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT fitzsimmonsdeborah perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT saxenaneeraj perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT twinechristopherp perineurallocalanaestheticcatheteraftermajorlowerlimbamputationtrialplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy