Cargando…

Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation

BACKGROUND: Health Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have high utility in evaluation of new interventions in genodermatoses, however inconsistent standards of development and validation have hampered widespread acceptance and adoption. OBJECTIVES: To identify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frew, John W., Davidson, Mark, Murrell, Dedee F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0739-5
_version_ 1783289217235812352
author Frew, John W.
Davidson, Mark
Murrell, Dedee F.
author_facet Frew, John W.
Davidson, Mark
Murrell, Dedee F.
author_sort Frew, John W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have high utility in evaluation of new interventions in genodermatoses, however inconsistent standards of development and validation have hampered widespread acceptance and adoption. OBJECTIVES: To identify all published HR-QoL PROMs in genodermatoses and critically evaluate their development and measurement properties. METHODS: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016053301). Ovid Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases were utilised for literature review using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. PROM development was assessed using the COSMIN Checklist and measurement properties were assessed against quality criteria for measurement properties of health standard questionnaires. RESULTS: 15 HRQoL PROMs in genodermatoses were identified. Major areas of deficiency in development were internal consistency, reliability and structural validity. No PROM satisfied measurement property standards for agreement, responsiveness or floor and ceiling effects. Four PROMs included Minimal Important Change scores for interpretability. Issues regarding the generalisability of the evaluated PROMs in culturally diverse and paediatric populations remain unresolved. CONCLUSIONS: The overall standards of development and measurement properties in PROMs in genodermatoses is fair, despite no single instrument meeting all requirements. None are perfectly validated according to COSMIN criteria but seven of the fifteen PROMs may be appropriate pending further validation. The development of culturally appropriate and child-specific variants of PROMs should be a priority in order to increase the utility of patient based outcome measures in genodermatoses in various patient populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-017-0739-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5747090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57470902018-01-03 Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation Frew, John W. Davidson, Mark Murrell, Dedee F. Orphanet J Rare Dis Review BACKGROUND: Health Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have high utility in evaluation of new interventions in genodermatoses, however inconsistent standards of development and validation have hampered widespread acceptance and adoption. OBJECTIVES: To identify all published HR-QoL PROMs in genodermatoses and critically evaluate their development and measurement properties. METHODS: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016053301). Ovid Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases were utilised for literature review using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. PROM development was assessed using the COSMIN Checklist and measurement properties were assessed against quality criteria for measurement properties of health standard questionnaires. RESULTS: 15 HRQoL PROMs in genodermatoses were identified. Major areas of deficiency in development were internal consistency, reliability and structural validity. No PROM satisfied measurement property standards for agreement, responsiveness or floor and ceiling effects. Four PROMs included Minimal Important Change scores for interpretability. Issues regarding the generalisability of the evaluated PROMs in culturally diverse and paediatric populations remain unresolved. CONCLUSIONS: The overall standards of development and measurement properties in PROMs in genodermatoses is fair, despite no single instrument meeting all requirements. None are perfectly validated according to COSMIN criteria but seven of the fifteen PROMs may be appropriate pending further validation. The development of culturally appropriate and child-specific variants of PROMs should be a priority in order to increase the utility of patient based outcome measures in genodermatoses in various patient populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-017-0739-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5747090/ /pubmed/29284525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0739-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Frew, John W.
Davidson, Mark
Murrell, Dedee F.
Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation
title Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation
title_full Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation
title_fullStr Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation
title_short Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation
title_sort disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0739-5
work_keys_str_mv AT frewjohnw diseasespecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifepatientreportedoutcomemeasuresingenodermatosesasystematicreviewandcriticalevaluation
AT davidsonmark diseasespecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifepatientreportedoutcomemeasuresingenodermatosesasystematicreviewandcriticalevaluation
AT murrelldedeef diseasespecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifepatientreportedoutcomemeasuresingenodermatosesasystematicreviewandcriticalevaluation