Cargando…

Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals

BACKGROUND: To determine alignment of proposed international standard outcomes sets for ophthalmic conditions to metrics currently reported by eye hospitals. METHODS: Mixed methods comparative benchmark study, including eight eye hospitals in Australia, India, Singapore, Sweden, U.K., and U.S. All a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michelotti, Monica, de Korne, Dirk F., Weizer, Jennifer S., Lee, Paul P., Flanagan, Declan, Kelly, Simon P., Odergren, Anne, Sandhu, Sukhpal S., Wai, Charity, Klazinga, Niek, Haripriya, Aravind, Stein, Joshua D., Hingorani, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0667-0
_version_ 1783289223839744000
author Michelotti, Monica
de Korne, Dirk F.
Weizer, Jennifer S.
Lee, Paul P.
Flanagan, Declan
Kelly, Simon P.
Odergren, Anne
Sandhu, Sukhpal S.
Wai, Charity
Klazinga, Niek
Haripriya, Aravind
Stein, Joshua D.
Hingorani, Melanie
author_facet Michelotti, Monica
de Korne, Dirk F.
Weizer, Jennifer S.
Lee, Paul P.
Flanagan, Declan
Kelly, Simon P.
Odergren, Anne
Sandhu, Sukhpal S.
Wai, Charity
Klazinga, Niek
Haripriya, Aravind
Stein, Joshua D.
Hingorani, Melanie
author_sort Michelotti, Monica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine alignment of proposed international standard outcomes sets for ophthalmic conditions to metrics currently reported by eye hospitals. METHODS: Mixed methods comparative benchmark study, including eight eye hospitals in Australia, India, Singapore, Sweden, U.K., and U.S. All are major international tertiary care and training centers in ophthalmology. Main outcome measure is consistency of ophthalmic outcomes measures reported. RESULTS: International agreed standard outcomes (ICHOM) sets are available for cataract surgery (10 metrics) and macular degeneration (7 metrics). The eight hospitals reported 22 different metrics for cataract surgery and 2 for macular degeneration, which showed only limited overlap with the proposed ICHOM metrics. None of the hospitals reported patient reported visual functioning or vision-related quality of life outcomes measures (PROMs). Three hospitals (38%) reported rates for uncomplicated cataract surgeries only. There was marked variation in how and at what point postoperatively visual outcomes following cataract, cornea, glaucoma, strabismus and oculoplastics procedures were reported. Seven (87.5%) measured post-operative infections and four (50%) measured 30 day unplanned reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes reporting for ophthalmic conditions currently widely varies across hospitals internationally and does not include patient-reported outcomes. Reaching consensus on measures and consistency in data collection will allow meaningful comparisons and provide an evidence base enabling improved sharing of “best practices” to improve eye care globally. Implementation of international standards is still a major challenge and practice-based knowledge on measures should be one of the inputs of the international standardization process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0667-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5747118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57471182018-01-03 Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals Michelotti, Monica de Korne, Dirk F. Weizer, Jennifer S. Lee, Paul P. Flanagan, Declan Kelly, Simon P. Odergren, Anne Sandhu, Sukhpal S. Wai, Charity Klazinga, Niek Haripriya, Aravind Stein, Joshua D. Hingorani, Melanie BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To determine alignment of proposed international standard outcomes sets for ophthalmic conditions to metrics currently reported by eye hospitals. METHODS: Mixed methods comparative benchmark study, including eight eye hospitals in Australia, India, Singapore, Sweden, U.K., and U.S. All are major international tertiary care and training centers in ophthalmology. Main outcome measure is consistency of ophthalmic outcomes measures reported. RESULTS: International agreed standard outcomes (ICHOM) sets are available for cataract surgery (10 metrics) and macular degeneration (7 metrics). The eight hospitals reported 22 different metrics for cataract surgery and 2 for macular degeneration, which showed only limited overlap with the proposed ICHOM metrics. None of the hospitals reported patient reported visual functioning or vision-related quality of life outcomes measures (PROMs). Three hospitals (38%) reported rates for uncomplicated cataract surgeries only. There was marked variation in how and at what point postoperatively visual outcomes following cataract, cornea, glaucoma, strabismus and oculoplastics procedures were reported. Seven (87.5%) measured post-operative infections and four (50%) measured 30 day unplanned reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes reporting for ophthalmic conditions currently widely varies across hospitals internationally and does not include patient-reported outcomes. Reaching consensus on measures and consistency in data collection will allow meaningful comparisons and provide an evidence base enabling improved sharing of “best practices” to improve eye care globally. Implementation of international standards is still a major challenge and practice-based knowledge on measures should be one of the inputs of the international standardization process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0667-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5747118/ /pubmed/29284445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0667-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Michelotti, Monica
de Korne, Dirk F.
Weizer, Jennifer S.
Lee, Paul P.
Flanagan, Declan
Kelly, Simon P.
Odergren, Anne
Sandhu, Sukhpal S.
Wai, Charity
Klazinga, Niek
Haripriya, Aravind
Stein, Joshua D.
Hingorani, Melanie
Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals
title Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals
title_full Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals
title_fullStr Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals
title_short Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals
title_sort mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0667-0
work_keys_str_mv AT michelottimonica mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT dekornedirkf mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT weizerjennifers mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT leepaulp mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT flanagandeclan mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT kellysimonp mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT odergrenanne mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT sandhusukhpals mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT waicharity mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT klazinganiek mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT haripriyaaravind mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT steinjoshuad mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals
AT hingoranimelanie mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals