Cargando…
Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals
BACKGROUND: To determine alignment of proposed international standard outcomes sets for ophthalmic conditions to metrics currently reported by eye hospitals. METHODS: Mixed methods comparative benchmark study, including eight eye hospitals in Australia, India, Singapore, Sweden, U.K., and U.S. All a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0667-0 |
_version_ | 1783289223839744000 |
---|---|
author | Michelotti, Monica de Korne, Dirk F. Weizer, Jennifer S. Lee, Paul P. Flanagan, Declan Kelly, Simon P. Odergren, Anne Sandhu, Sukhpal S. Wai, Charity Klazinga, Niek Haripriya, Aravind Stein, Joshua D. Hingorani, Melanie |
author_facet | Michelotti, Monica de Korne, Dirk F. Weizer, Jennifer S. Lee, Paul P. Flanagan, Declan Kelly, Simon P. Odergren, Anne Sandhu, Sukhpal S. Wai, Charity Klazinga, Niek Haripriya, Aravind Stein, Joshua D. Hingorani, Melanie |
author_sort | Michelotti, Monica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To determine alignment of proposed international standard outcomes sets for ophthalmic conditions to metrics currently reported by eye hospitals. METHODS: Mixed methods comparative benchmark study, including eight eye hospitals in Australia, India, Singapore, Sweden, U.K., and U.S. All are major international tertiary care and training centers in ophthalmology. Main outcome measure is consistency of ophthalmic outcomes measures reported. RESULTS: International agreed standard outcomes (ICHOM) sets are available for cataract surgery (10 metrics) and macular degeneration (7 metrics). The eight hospitals reported 22 different metrics for cataract surgery and 2 for macular degeneration, which showed only limited overlap with the proposed ICHOM metrics. None of the hospitals reported patient reported visual functioning or vision-related quality of life outcomes measures (PROMs). Three hospitals (38%) reported rates for uncomplicated cataract surgeries only. There was marked variation in how and at what point postoperatively visual outcomes following cataract, cornea, glaucoma, strabismus and oculoplastics procedures were reported. Seven (87.5%) measured post-operative infections and four (50%) measured 30 day unplanned reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes reporting for ophthalmic conditions currently widely varies across hospitals internationally and does not include patient-reported outcomes. Reaching consensus on measures and consistency in data collection will allow meaningful comparisons and provide an evidence base enabling improved sharing of “best practices” to improve eye care globally. Implementation of international standards is still a major challenge and practice-based knowledge on measures should be one of the inputs of the international standardization process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0667-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5747118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57471182018-01-03 Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals Michelotti, Monica de Korne, Dirk F. Weizer, Jennifer S. Lee, Paul P. Flanagan, Declan Kelly, Simon P. Odergren, Anne Sandhu, Sukhpal S. Wai, Charity Klazinga, Niek Haripriya, Aravind Stein, Joshua D. Hingorani, Melanie BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To determine alignment of proposed international standard outcomes sets for ophthalmic conditions to metrics currently reported by eye hospitals. METHODS: Mixed methods comparative benchmark study, including eight eye hospitals in Australia, India, Singapore, Sweden, U.K., and U.S. All are major international tertiary care and training centers in ophthalmology. Main outcome measure is consistency of ophthalmic outcomes measures reported. RESULTS: International agreed standard outcomes (ICHOM) sets are available for cataract surgery (10 metrics) and macular degeneration (7 metrics). The eight hospitals reported 22 different metrics for cataract surgery and 2 for macular degeneration, which showed only limited overlap with the proposed ICHOM metrics. None of the hospitals reported patient reported visual functioning or vision-related quality of life outcomes measures (PROMs). Three hospitals (38%) reported rates for uncomplicated cataract surgeries only. There was marked variation in how and at what point postoperatively visual outcomes following cataract, cornea, glaucoma, strabismus and oculoplastics procedures were reported. Seven (87.5%) measured post-operative infections and four (50%) measured 30 day unplanned reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes reporting for ophthalmic conditions currently widely varies across hospitals internationally and does not include patient-reported outcomes. Reaching consensus on measures and consistency in data collection will allow meaningful comparisons and provide an evidence base enabling improved sharing of “best practices” to improve eye care globally. Implementation of international standards is still a major challenge and practice-based knowledge on measures should be one of the inputs of the international standardization process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0667-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5747118/ /pubmed/29284445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0667-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Michelotti, Monica de Korne, Dirk F. Weizer, Jennifer S. Lee, Paul P. Flanagan, Declan Kelly, Simon P. Odergren, Anne Sandhu, Sukhpal S. Wai, Charity Klazinga, Niek Haripriya, Aravind Stein, Joshua D. Hingorani, Melanie Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals |
title | Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals |
title_full | Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals |
title_fullStr | Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed | Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals |
title_short | Mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals |
title_sort | mapping standard ophthalmic outcome sets to metrics currently reported in eight eye hospitals |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0667-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michelottimonica mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT dekornedirkf mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT weizerjennifers mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT leepaulp mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT flanagandeclan mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT kellysimonp mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT odergrenanne mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT sandhusukhpals mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT waicharity mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT klazinganiek mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT haripriyaaravind mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT steinjoshuad mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals AT hingoranimelanie mappingstandardophthalmicoutcomesetstometricscurrentlyreportedineighteyehospitals |