Cargando…
Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Incision size plays a critical role in the efficacy of cataract surgery, but the available evidence on ideal incision size is inconsistent. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of coaxial microincisional phacoemulsification surgery (MICS) compared with tha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0661-6 |
_version_ | 1783289225240641536 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Lijun Xiao, Xiao Zhao, Lin Zhang, Yi Wang, Jianming Zhou, Aiyi Wang, Jianchao Wu, Qian |
author_facet | Wang, Lijun Xiao, Xiao Zhao, Lin Zhang, Yi Wang, Jianming Zhou, Aiyi Wang, Jianchao Wu, Qian |
author_sort | Wang, Lijun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incision size plays a critical role in the efficacy of cataract surgery, but the available evidence on ideal incision size is inconsistent. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of coaxial microincisional phacoemulsification surgery (MICS) compared with that of standard-incision phacoemulsification surgery (SICS) in patients with age-related cataracts. METHODS: The Cochrane Library (Wiley Online Library), PubMed, Medline, National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and VIP databases were searched to identify reports of clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MICS to SICS for the treatment of age-related cataracts. The outcomes of interest included surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), effective phacoemulsification time (EPT), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell count (ECC), endothelial cell count loss (ECC Loss %), and average ultrasonic energy (AVE). RESULTS: Eleven RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed in EPT (Z = 1.29, P > 0.05), CCT (1 day: Z = 1.37, P > 0.05; 7 days: Z = 0.75, P > 0.05; 30 days: Z = 0.38, P > 0.05; 90 days: Z = 0.29, P > 0.05), ECC (7 days: Z = 1.13, P > 0.05; 30 days: Z = 1.42, P > 0.05) or ECC Loss % (7 days: Z = 0.24, P > 0.05; 30 days: Z = 0.06, P > 0.05; 90 days: Z = 0.10, P > 0.05) between MICS and SICS. However, statistically significant differences were found in AVE (Z = 4.19, P < 0.0001) and SIA (1 day: Z = 10.33, P < 0.00001; 7 days: Z = 10.71, P < 0.00001; 30 days: Z = 10.95, P < 0.00001; 90 days: Z = 2.21,- P < 0.01) between MICS and SICS. CONCLUSION: Compared with SICS, MICS can reduce short-term and long-term SIA, but it does not differ in safety outcomes or in the time required for surgery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-017-0661-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5747124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57471242018-01-03 Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis Wang, Lijun Xiao, Xiao Zhao, Lin Zhang, Yi Wang, Jianming Zhou, Aiyi Wang, Jianchao Wu, Qian BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Incision size plays a critical role in the efficacy of cataract surgery, but the available evidence on ideal incision size is inconsistent. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of coaxial microincisional phacoemulsification surgery (MICS) compared with that of standard-incision phacoemulsification surgery (SICS) in patients with age-related cataracts. METHODS: The Cochrane Library (Wiley Online Library), PubMed, Medline, National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and VIP databases were searched to identify reports of clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MICS to SICS for the treatment of age-related cataracts. The outcomes of interest included surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), effective phacoemulsification time (EPT), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell count (ECC), endothelial cell count loss (ECC Loss %), and average ultrasonic energy (AVE). RESULTS: Eleven RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed in EPT (Z = 1.29, P > 0.05), CCT (1 day: Z = 1.37, P > 0.05; 7 days: Z = 0.75, P > 0.05; 30 days: Z = 0.38, P > 0.05; 90 days: Z = 0.29, P > 0.05), ECC (7 days: Z = 1.13, P > 0.05; 30 days: Z = 1.42, P > 0.05) or ECC Loss % (7 days: Z = 0.24, P > 0.05; 30 days: Z = 0.06, P > 0.05; 90 days: Z = 0.10, P > 0.05) between MICS and SICS. However, statistically significant differences were found in AVE (Z = 4.19, P < 0.0001) and SIA (1 day: Z = 10.33, P < 0.00001; 7 days: Z = 10.71, P < 0.00001; 30 days: Z = 10.95, P < 0.00001; 90 days: Z = 2.21,- P < 0.01) between MICS and SICS. CONCLUSION: Compared with SICS, MICS can reduce short-term and long-term SIA, but it does not differ in safety outcomes or in the time required for surgery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-017-0661-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5747124/ /pubmed/29284444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0661-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Lijun Xiao, Xiao Zhao, Lin Zhang, Yi Wang, Jianming Zhou, Aiyi Wang, Jianchao Wu, Qian Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0661-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanglijun comparisonofefficacybetweencoaxialmicroincisionandstandardincisionphacoemulsificationinpatientswithagerelatedcataractsametaanalysis AT xiaoxiao comparisonofefficacybetweencoaxialmicroincisionandstandardincisionphacoemulsificationinpatientswithagerelatedcataractsametaanalysis AT zhaolin comparisonofefficacybetweencoaxialmicroincisionandstandardincisionphacoemulsificationinpatientswithagerelatedcataractsametaanalysis AT zhangyi comparisonofefficacybetweencoaxialmicroincisionandstandardincisionphacoemulsificationinpatientswithagerelatedcataractsametaanalysis AT wangjianming comparisonofefficacybetweencoaxialmicroincisionandstandardincisionphacoemulsificationinpatientswithagerelatedcataractsametaanalysis AT zhouaiyi comparisonofefficacybetweencoaxialmicroincisionandstandardincisionphacoemulsificationinpatientswithagerelatedcataractsametaanalysis AT wangjianchao comparisonofefficacybetweencoaxialmicroincisionandstandardincisionphacoemulsificationinpatientswithagerelatedcataractsametaanalysis AT wuqian comparisonofefficacybetweencoaxialmicroincisionandstandardincisionphacoemulsificationinpatientswithagerelatedcataractsametaanalysis |