Cargando…

Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT)

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in critically ill patients often involves bronchoscopic optical guidance. However, this procedure is not without disadvantages. Therefore, we aimed to study a recently introduced endotracheal tube-mounted camera (VivaSight(TM)-SL tube [VST]; E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grensemann, Jörn, Eichler, Lars, Kähler, Sophie, Jarczak, Dominik, Simon, Marcel, Pinnschmidt, Hans O., Kluge, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0
_version_ 1783289226732765184
author Grensemann, Jörn
Eichler, Lars
Kähler, Sophie
Jarczak, Dominik
Simon, Marcel
Pinnschmidt, Hans O.
Kluge, Stefan
author_facet Grensemann, Jörn
Eichler, Lars
Kähler, Sophie
Jarczak, Dominik
Simon, Marcel
Pinnschmidt, Hans O.
Kluge, Stefan
author_sort Grensemann, Jörn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in critically ill patients often involves bronchoscopic optical guidance. However, this procedure is not without disadvantages. Therefore, we aimed to study a recently introduced endotracheal tube-mounted camera (VivaSight(TM)-SL tube [VST]; ETView, Misgav, Israel) for guiding PDT. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial involving 46 critically ill patients who received PDT using optical guidance with a VST or with bronchoscopy. The primary outcome measure was visualization of the tracheal structures (i.e., identification and monitoring of the thyroid, cricoid, and tracheal cartilage and the posterior wall) rated on 4-point Likert scales. Secondary measures were the quality of ventilation (before puncture and during the tracheostomy procedure rated on 4-point Likert scales) and blood gases sampled at standardized time points. RESULTS: The mean ratings for visualization (lower values better; values given for per-protocol analysis) were 5.4 (95% CI 4.5–6.3) for the VST group and 4.0 (95% CI 4.0–4.0) for the bronchoscopy group (p < 0.001). Mean ventilation ratings were 2.5 (95% CI 2.1–2.9) for VST and 5.0 (95% CI 4.4–5.7) for bronchoscopy (p < 0.001). Arterial carbon dioxide increased to 5.9 (95% CI 5.4–6.5) kPa in the VST group vs. 8.3 (95% CI 7.2–9.5) kPa in the bronchoscopy group (p < 0.001), and pH decreased to 7.40 (95% CI 7.36–7.43) in the VST group vs. 7.26 (95% CI 7.22–7.30) in the bronchoscopy group (p < 0.001), at the end of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Visualization of PDT with the VST is not noninferior to guidance by bronchoscopy. Ventilation is superior with less hypercarbia with the VST. Because visualization is not a prerequisite for PDT, patients requiring stable ventilation with normocarbia may benefit from PDT with the VST. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02861001. Registered on 13 June 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5747130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57471302018-01-03 Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT) Grensemann, Jörn Eichler, Lars Kähler, Sophie Jarczak, Dominik Simon, Marcel Pinnschmidt, Hans O. Kluge, Stefan Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in critically ill patients often involves bronchoscopic optical guidance. However, this procedure is not without disadvantages. Therefore, we aimed to study a recently introduced endotracheal tube-mounted camera (VivaSight(TM)-SL tube [VST]; ETView, Misgav, Israel) for guiding PDT. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial involving 46 critically ill patients who received PDT using optical guidance with a VST or with bronchoscopy. The primary outcome measure was visualization of the tracheal structures (i.e., identification and monitoring of the thyroid, cricoid, and tracheal cartilage and the posterior wall) rated on 4-point Likert scales. Secondary measures were the quality of ventilation (before puncture and during the tracheostomy procedure rated on 4-point Likert scales) and blood gases sampled at standardized time points. RESULTS: The mean ratings for visualization (lower values better; values given for per-protocol analysis) were 5.4 (95% CI 4.5–6.3) for the VST group and 4.0 (95% CI 4.0–4.0) for the bronchoscopy group (p < 0.001). Mean ventilation ratings were 2.5 (95% CI 2.1–2.9) for VST and 5.0 (95% CI 4.4–5.7) for bronchoscopy (p < 0.001). Arterial carbon dioxide increased to 5.9 (95% CI 5.4–6.5) kPa in the VST group vs. 8.3 (95% CI 7.2–9.5) kPa in the bronchoscopy group (p < 0.001), and pH decreased to 7.40 (95% CI 7.36–7.43) in the VST group vs. 7.26 (95% CI 7.22–7.30) in the bronchoscopy group (p < 0.001), at the end of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Visualization of PDT with the VST is not noninferior to guidance by bronchoscopy. Ventilation is superior with less hypercarbia with the VST. Because visualization is not a prerequisite for PDT, patients requiring stable ventilation with normocarbia may benefit from PDT with the VST. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02861001. Registered on 13 June 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5747130/ /pubmed/29284503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Grensemann, Jörn
Eichler, Lars
Kähler, Sophie
Jarczak, Dominik
Simon, Marcel
Pinnschmidt, Hans O.
Kluge, Stefan
Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT)
title Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT)
title_full Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT)
title_fullStr Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT)
title_full_unstemmed Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT)
title_short Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT)
title_sort bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (vivapdt)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0
work_keys_str_mv AT grensemannjorn bronchoscopyversusanendotrachealtubemountedcamerafortheperiinterventionalvisualizationofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyaprospectiverandomizedtrialvivapdt
AT eichlerlars bronchoscopyversusanendotrachealtubemountedcamerafortheperiinterventionalvisualizationofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyaprospectiverandomizedtrialvivapdt
AT kahlersophie bronchoscopyversusanendotrachealtubemountedcamerafortheperiinterventionalvisualizationofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyaprospectiverandomizedtrialvivapdt
AT jarczakdominik bronchoscopyversusanendotrachealtubemountedcamerafortheperiinterventionalvisualizationofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyaprospectiverandomizedtrialvivapdt
AT simonmarcel bronchoscopyversusanendotrachealtubemountedcamerafortheperiinterventionalvisualizationofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyaprospectiverandomizedtrialvivapdt
AT pinnschmidthanso bronchoscopyversusanendotrachealtubemountedcamerafortheperiinterventionalvisualizationofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyaprospectiverandomizedtrialvivapdt
AT klugestefan bronchoscopyversusanendotrachealtubemountedcamerafortheperiinterventionalvisualizationofpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyaprospectiverandomizedtrialvivapdt