Cargando…

Why some sites are responding better to anti-malarial interventions? A case study from western Kenya

BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, malaria interventions over the last decades have been successful in reducing both mortality and morbidity. In western Kenya however some areas experience contrasting outcomes of the ongoing interventions while the causes for this observation remains not yet clearly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapesa, Anthony, Kweka, Eliningaya J., Atieli, Harrysone, Kamugisha, Erasmus, Zhou, Guofa, Githeko, Andrew K., Yan, Guiyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2145-9
_version_ 1783289237229010944
author Kapesa, Anthony
Kweka, Eliningaya J.
Atieli, Harrysone
Kamugisha, Erasmus
Zhou, Guofa
Githeko, Andrew K.
Yan, Guiyun
author_facet Kapesa, Anthony
Kweka, Eliningaya J.
Atieli, Harrysone
Kamugisha, Erasmus
Zhou, Guofa
Githeko, Andrew K.
Yan, Guiyun
author_sort Kapesa, Anthony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, malaria interventions over the last decades have been successful in reducing both mortality and morbidity. In western Kenya however some areas experience contrasting outcomes of the ongoing interventions while the causes for this observation remains not yet clearly known. METHODS: The WHO insecticide (deltamethrin) susceptibility test of the common malaria vectors was studied. Multiple surveys on household use and hospital prescriptions of antimalarial drugs from 2003 to 2015 were done. Along with this, cross sectional surveys on their availability in the local drug dispensing outlets were also done in 2015. Monthly precipitations and air temperature data was collected along with systematic review on abundance and composition of common malaria vectors in the study area before and during interventions. The above factors were used to explain the possible causes of contrasting outcome of malaria interventions between the three study sites. RESULTS: Areas with malaria resurgence or sustained high transmission (Kombewa and Marani) showed higher composition of Anopheles funestus sensu lato (s.l.) than the previously abundant Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) and the later had higher composition to an area with a sustained infection decline (Iguhu). Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Kombewa showed highest resistance (50% mortality) upon exposure to WHO deltamethrin discriminating dosage of 0.75% while those from Marani and Iguhu had reduced resistance status (both had a mean mortality of 91%). Sampled An. funestus s.l. from Marani were also highly resistant to deltamethrin as 57% of the exposed vectors survived. An increasing of mean air temperature by 2 °C was noted for Marani and Iguhu from 2013 to 2015 and was accompanied by an increased rainfall at Marani. Community drug use and availability in selling outlets along with prescription in hospitals were not linked to the struggling control of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The malaria vector species composition shift, insecticide resistance and climatic warming were the likely cause of the contrasting outcome of malaria intervention in western Kenya. Surveillance of malaria parasite and vector dynamics along with insecticide resistance and vector biting behaviour monitoring are highly recommended in these areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5747174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57471742018-01-03 Why some sites are responding better to anti-malarial interventions? A case study from western Kenya Kapesa, Anthony Kweka, Eliningaya J. Atieli, Harrysone Kamugisha, Erasmus Zhou, Guofa Githeko, Andrew K. Yan, Guiyun Malar J Research BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, malaria interventions over the last decades have been successful in reducing both mortality and morbidity. In western Kenya however some areas experience contrasting outcomes of the ongoing interventions while the causes for this observation remains not yet clearly known. METHODS: The WHO insecticide (deltamethrin) susceptibility test of the common malaria vectors was studied. Multiple surveys on household use and hospital prescriptions of antimalarial drugs from 2003 to 2015 were done. Along with this, cross sectional surveys on their availability in the local drug dispensing outlets were also done in 2015. Monthly precipitations and air temperature data was collected along with systematic review on abundance and composition of common malaria vectors in the study area before and during interventions. The above factors were used to explain the possible causes of contrasting outcome of malaria interventions between the three study sites. RESULTS: Areas with malaria resurgence or sustained high transmission (Kombewa and Marani) showed higher composition of Anopheles funestus sensu lato (s.l.) than the previously abundant Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) and the later had higher composition to an area with a sustained infection decline (Iguhu). Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Kombewa showed highest resistance (50% mortality) upon exposure to WHO deltamethrin discriminating dosage of 0.75% while those from Marani and Iguhu had reduced resistance status (both had a mean mortality of 91%). Sampled An. funestus s.l. from Marani were also highly resistant to deltamethrin as 57% of the exposed vectors survived. An increasing of mean air temperature by 2 °C was noted for Marani and Iguhu from 2013 to 2015 and was accompanied by an increased rainfall at Marani. Community drug use and availability in selling outlets along with prescription in hospitals were not linked to the struggling control of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The malaria vector species composition shift, insecticide resistance and climatic warming were the likely cause of the contrasting outcome of malaria intervention in western Kenya. Surveillance of malaria parasite and vector dynamics along with insecticide resistance and vector biting behaviour monitoring are highly recommended in these areas. BioMed Central 2017-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5747174/ /pubmed/29284476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2145-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kapesa, Anthony
Kweka, Eliningaya J.
Atieli, Harrysone
Kamugisha, Erasmus
Zhou, Guofa
Githeko, Andrew K.
Yan, Guiyun
Why some sites are responding better to anti-malarial interventions? A case study from western Kenya
title Why some sites are responding better to anti-malarial interventions? A case study from western Kenya
title_full Why some sites are responding better to anti-malarial interventions? A case study from western Kenya
title_fullStr Why some sites are responding better to anti-malarial interventions? A case study from western Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Why some sites are responding better to anti-malarial interventions? A case study from western Kenya
title_short Why some sites are responding better to anti-malarial interventions? A case study from western Kenya
title_sort why some sites are responding better to anti-malarial interventions? a case study from western kenya
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2145-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kapesaanthony whysomesitesarerespondingbettertoantimalarialinterventionsacasestudyfromwesternkenya
AT kwekaeliningayaj whysomesitesarerespondingbettertoantimalarialinterventionsacasestudyfromwesternkenya
AT atieliharrysone whysomesitesarerespondingbettertoantimalarialinterventionsacasestudyfromwesternkenya
AT kamugishaerasmus whysomesitesarerespondingbettertoantimalarialinterventionsacasestudyfromwesternkenya
AT zhouguofa whysomesitesarerespondingbettertoantimalarialinterventionsacasestudyfromwesternkenya
AT githekoandrewk whysomesitesarerespondingbettertoantimalarialinterventionsacasestudyfromwesternkenya
AT yanguiyun whysomesitesarerespondingbettertoantimalarialinterventionsacasestudyfromwesternkenya