Cargando…

A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy

BACKGROUND: Emergency medical dispatching should be as accurate as possible in order to ensure patient safety and optimize the use of ambulance resources. This study aimed to compare the accuracy, measured as priority level, between two Swedish dispatch protocols – the three-graded priority protocol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torlén, Klara, Kurland, Lisa, Castrén, Maaret, Olanders, Knut, Bohm, Katarina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0464-z
_version_ 1783289256222916608
author Torlén, Klara
Kurland, Lisa
Castrén, Maaret
Olanders, Knut
Bohm, Katarina
author_facet Torlén, Klara
Kurland, Lisa
Castrén, Maaret
Olanders, Knut
Bohm, Katarina
author_sort Torlén, Klara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency medical dispatching should be as accurate as possible in order to ensure patient safety and optimize the use of ambulance resources. This study aimed to compare the accuracy, measured as priority level, between two Swedish dispatch protocols – the three-graded priority protocol Medical Index and a newly developed prototype, the four-graded priority protocol, RETTS-A. METHODS: A simulation study was carried out at the Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) in Stockholm, Sweden, between October and March 2016. Fifty-three voluntary telecommunicators working at SOS Alarm were recruited nationally. Each telecommunicator handled 26 emergency medical calls, simulated by experienced standard patients. Manuscripts for the scenarios were based on recorded real-life calls, representing the six most common complaints. A cross-over design with 13 + 13 calls was used. Priority level and medical condition for each scenario was set through expert consensus and used as gold standard in the study. RESULTS: A total of 1293 calls were included in the analysis. For priority level, n = 349 (54.0%) of the calls were assessed correctly with Medical Index and n = 309 (48.0%) with RETTS-A (p = 0.012). Sensitivity for the highest priority level was 82.6% (95% confidence interval: 76.6–87.3%) in the Medical Index and 54.0% (44.3–63.4%) in RETTS-A. Overtriage was 37.9% (34.2–41.7%) in the Medical Index and 28.6% (25.2–32.2%) in RETTS-A. The corresponding proportion of undertriage was 6.3% (4.7–8.5%) and 23.4% (20.3–26.9%) respectively. CONCLUSION: In this simulation study we demonstrate that Medical Index had a higher accuracy for priority level and less undertriage than the new prototype RETTS-A. The overall accuracy of both protocols is to be considered as low. Overtriage challenges resource utilization while undertriage threatens patient safety. The results suggest that in order to improve patient safety both protocols need revisions in order to guarantee safe emergency medical dispatching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5747276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57472762018-01-03 A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy Torlén, Klara Kurland, Lisa Castrén, Maaret Olanders, Knut Bohm, Katarina Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Emergency medical dispatching should be as accurate as possible in order to ensure patient safety and optimize the use of ambulance resources. This study aimed to compare the accuracy, measured as priority level, between two Swedish dispatch protocols – the three-graded priority protocol Medical Index and a newly developed prototype, the four-graded priority protocol, RETTS-A. METHODS: A simulation study was carried out at the Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) in Stockholm, Sweden, between October and March 2016. Fifty-three voluntary telecommunicators working at SOS Alarm were recruited nationally. Each telecommunicator handled 26 emergency medical calls, simulated by experienced standard patients. Manuscripts for the scenarios were based on recorded real-life calls, representing the six most common complaints. A cross-over design with 13 + 13 calls was used. Priority level and medical condition for each scenario was set through expert consensus and used as gold standard in the study. RESULTS: A total of 1293 calls were included in the analysis. For priority level, n = 349 (54.0%) of the calls were assessed correctly with Medical Index and n = 309 (48.0%) with RETTS-A (p = 0.012). Sensitivity for the highest priority level was 82.6% (95% confidence interval: 76.6–87.3%) in the Medical Index and 54.0% (44.3–63.4%) in RETTS-A. Overtriage was 37.9% (34.2–41.7%) in the Medical Index and 28.6% (25.2–32.2%) in RETTS-A. The corresponding proportion of undertriage was 6.3% (4.7–8.5%) and 23.4% (20.3–26.9%) respectively. CONCLUSION: In this simulation study we demonstrate that Medical Index had a higher accuracy for priority level and less undertriage than the new prototype RETTS-A. The overall accuracy of both protocols is to be considered as low. Overtriage challenges resource utilization while undertriage threatens patient safety. The results suggest that in order to improve patient safety both protocols need revisions in order to guarantee safe emergency medical dispatching. BioMed Central 2017-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5747276/ /pubmed/29284542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0464-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Torlén, Klara
Kurland, Lisa
Castrén, Maaret
Olanders, Knut
Bohm, Katarina
A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy
title A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy
title_full A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy
title_fullStr A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy
title_short A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy
title_sort comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5747276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0464-z
work_keys_str_mv AT torlenklara acomparisonoftwoemergencymedicaldispatchprotocolswithrespecttoaccuracy
AT kurlandlisa acomparisonoftwoemergencymedicaldispatchprotocolswithrespecttoaccuracy
AT castrenmaaret acomparisonoftwoemergencymedicaldispatchprotocolswithrespecttoaccuracy
AT olandersknut acomparisonoftwoemergencymedicaldispatchprotocolswithrespecttoaccuracy
AT bohmkatarina acomparisonoftwoemergencymedicaldispatchprotocolswithrespecttoaccuracy
AT torlenklara comparisonoftwoemergencymedicaldispatchprotocolswithrespecttoaccuracy
AT kurlandlisa comparisonoftwoemergencymedicaldispatchprotocolswithrespecttoaccuracy
AT castrenmaaret comparisonoftwoemergencymedicaldispatchprotocolswithrespecttoaccuracy
AT olandersknut comparisonoftwoemergencymedicaldispatchprotocolswithrespecttoaccuracy
AT bohmkatarina comparisonoftwoemergencymedicaldispatchprotocolswithrespecttoaccuracy