Cargando…

The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To conduct systematic analyses to evaluate the efficacy of progesterone therapy for the prevention of miscarriages in pregnant women experiencing threatened abortion. METHODS: In November 2016, we performed a systematic literature search and identified 51 articles in PubMed, Embase, and C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hee Joong, Park, Tae Chul, Kim, Jae Hoon, Norwitz, Errol, Lee, Banghyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3616875
_version_ 1783289361485266944
author Lee, Hee Joong
Park, Tae Chul
Kim, Jae Hoon
Norwitz, Errol
Lee, Banghyun
author_facet Lee, Hee Joong
Park, Tae Chul
Kim, Jae Hoon
Norwitz, Errol
Lee, Banghyun
author_sort Lee, Hee Joong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To conduct systematic analyses to evaluate the efficacy of progesterone therapy for the prevention of miscarriages in pregnant women experiencing threatened abortion. METHODS: In November 2016, we performed a systematic literature search and identified 51 articles in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. We identified nine randomized trials that included 913 pregnant women (including 322 treated with oral dydrogesterone, 213 treated with vaginal progesterone, and 378 control subjects) who met the selection criteria. RESULTS: The incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the total progesterone group than in the control group (13.0% versus 21.7%; odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36 to 0.78; P = 0.001; I(2), 0%). Moreover, the incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the oral dydrogesterone group than in the control group (11.7% versus 22.6%; odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.71; P = 0.001; I(2), 0%) and was lower in the vaginal progesterone group than in the control group, although this difference was nonsignificant (15.4% versus 20.3%; odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.34; P = 0.30; I(2), 0%). However, the incidence of miscarriage was not different between the oral dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone groups. CONCLUSION: Progesterone therapy, especially oral dydrogesterone, can effectively prevent miscarriage in pregnant women experiencing threatened abortion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5748117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57481172018-02-01 The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Lee, Hee Joong Park, Tae Chul Kim, Jae Hoon Norwitz, Errol Lee, Banghyun Biomed Res Int Review Article OBJECTIVE: To conduct systematic analyses to evaluate the efficacy of progesterone therapy for the prevention of miscarriages in pregnant women experiencing threatened abortion. METHODS: In November 2016, we performed a systematic literature search and identified 51 articles in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. We identified nine randomized trials that included 913 pregnant women (including 322 treated with oral dydrogesterone, 213 treated with vaginal progesterone, and 378 control subjects) who met the selection criteria. RESULTS: The incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the total progesterone group than in the control group (13.0% versus 21.7%; odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36 to 0.78; P = 0.001; I(2), 0%). Moreover, the incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the oral dydrogesterone group than in the control group (11.7% versus 22.6%; odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.71; P = 0.001; I(2), 0%) and was lower in the vaginal progesterone group than in the control group, although this difference was nonsignificant (15.4% versus 20.3%; odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.34; P = 0.30; I(2), 0%). However, the incidence of miscarriage was not different between the oral dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone groups. CONCLUSION: Progesterone therapy, especially oral dydrogesterone, can effectively prevent miscarriage in pregnant women experiencing threatened abortion. Hindawi 2017 2017-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5748117/ /pubmed/29392134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3616875 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hee Joong Lee et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Lee, Hee Joong
Park, Tae Chul
Kim, Jae Hoon
Norwitz, Errol
Lee, Banghyun
The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort influence of oral dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone on threatened abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3616875
work_keys_str_mv AT leeheejoong theinfluenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT parktaechul theinfluenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimjaehoon theinfluenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT norwitzerrol theinfluenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leebanghyun theinfluenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leeheejoong influenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT parktaechul influenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimjaehoon influenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT norwitzerrol influenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leebanghyun influenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis