Cargando…
The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: To conduct systematic analyses to evaluate the efficacy of progesterone therapy for the prevention of miscarriages in pregnant women experiencing threatened abortion. METHODS: In November 2016, we performed a systematic literature search and identified 51 articles in PubMed, Embase, and C...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3616875 |
_version_ | 1783289361485266944 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Hee Joong Park, Tae Chul Kim, Jae Hoon Norwitz, Errol Lee, Banghyun |
author_facet | Lee, Hee Joong Park, Tae Chul Kim, Jae Hoon Norwitz, Errol Lee, Banghyun |
author_sort | Lee, Hee Joong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To conduct systematic analyses to evaluate the efficacy of progesterone therapy for the prevention of miscarriages in pregnant women experiencing threatened abortion. METHODS: In November 2016, we performed a systematic literature search and identified 51 articles in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. We identified nine randomized trials that included 913 pregnant women (including 322 treated with oral dydrogesterone, 213 treated with vaginal progesterone, and 378 control subjects) who met the selection criteria. RESULTS: The incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the total progesterone group than in the control group (13.0% versus 21.7%; odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36 to 0.78; P = 0.001; I(2), 0%). Moreover, the incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the oral dydrogesterone group than in the control group (11.7% versus 22.6%; odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.71; P = 0.001; I(2), 0%) and was lower in the vaginal progesterone group than in the control group, although this difference was nonsignificant (15.4% versus 20.3%; odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.34; P = 0.30; I(2), 0%). However, the incidence of miscarriage was not different between the oral dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone groups. CONCLUSION: Progesterone therapy, especially oral dydrogesterone, can effectively prevent miscarriage in pregnant women experiencing threatened abortion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5748117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57481172018-02-01 The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Lee, Hee Joong Park, Tae Chul Kim, Jae Hoon Norwitz, Errol Lee, Banghyun Biomed Res Int Review Article OBJECTIVE: To conduct systematic analyses to evaluate the efficacy of progesterone therapy for the prevention of miscarriages in pregnant women experiencing threatened abortion. METHODS: In November 2016, we performed a systematic literature search and identified 51 articles in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. We identified nine randomized trials that included 913 pregnant women (including 322 treated with oral dydrogesterone, 213 treated with vaginal progesterone, and 378 control subjects) who met the selection criteria. RESULTS: The incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the total progesterone group than in the control group (13.0% versus 21.7%; odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36 to 0.78; P = 0.001; I(2), 0%). Moreover, the incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the oral dydrogesterone group than in the control group (11.7% versus 22.6%; odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.71; P = 0.001; I(2), 0%) and was lower in the vaginal progesterone group than in the control group, although this difference was nonsignificant (15.4% versus 20.3%; odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.34; P = 0.30; I(2), 0%). However, the incidence of miscarriage was not different between the oral dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone groups. CONCLUSION: Progesterone therapy, especially oral dydrogesterone, can effectively prevent miscarriage in pregnant women experiencing threatened abortion. Hindawi 2017 2017-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5748117/ /pubmed/29392134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3616875 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hee Joong Lee et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Lee, Hee Joong Park, Tae Chul Kim, Jae Hoon Norwitz, Errol Lee, Banghyun The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | influence of oral dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone on threatened abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3616875 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeheejoong theinfluenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT parktaechul theinfluenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimjaehoon theinfluenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT norwitzerrol theinfluenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leebanghyun theinfluenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leeheejoong influenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT parktaechul influenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimjaehoon influenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT norwitzerrol influenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leebanghyun influenceoforaldydrogesteroneandvaginalprogesteroneonthreatenedabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |