Cargando…

Shape Optimization of Bone-Bonding Subperiosteal Devices with Finite Element Analysis

Subperiosteal bone-bonding devices have been proposed for less invasive treatments in orthodontics. The device is osseointegrated onto a bone surface without fixation screws and is expected to rapidly attain a bone-bonding strength that successfully meets clinical performance. Hence, the device'...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogasawara, Takeshi, Uezono, Masayoshi, Takakuda, Kazuo, Kikuchi, Masanori, Suzuki, Shoichi, Moriyama, Keiji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3609062
_version_ 1783289364248264704
author Ogasawara, Takeshi
Uezono, Masayoshi
Takakuda, Kazuo
Kikuchi, Masanori
Suzuki, Shoichi
Moriyama, Keiji
author_facet Ogasawara, Takeshi
Uezono, Masayoshi
Takakuda, Kazuo
Kikuchi, Masanori
Suzuki, Shoichi
Moriyama, Keiji
author_sort Ogasawara, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description Subperiosteal bone-bonding devices have been proposed for less invasive treatments in orthodontics. The device is osseointegrated onto a bone surface without fixation screws and is expected to rapidly attain a bone-bonding strength that successfully meets clinical performance. Hence, the device's optimum shape for rapid and strong bone bonding was examined in this study by finite element analyses. First, a stress analysis was performed for a circular rod device with an orthodontic force parallel to the bone surface, and the estimate of the bone-bonding strength based on the bone fracture criterion was verified with the results of an animal experiment. In total, four cross-sectional rod geometries were investigated: circular (Cr), elliptical (El), semicircular (Sc), and rectangular (Rc). By changing the height of the newly formed bone to mimic the progression of new bone formation, the estimation of the bone-bonding strength was repeated for each geometry. The rod with the Rc cross section exhibited the best performance, followed by those with the Sc, El, and Cr cross sections, from the aspects of the rapid acquisition of strength and the strength itself. Thus, the rectangular cross section is the best for rod-like subperiosteal devices for rapid bone bonding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5748129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57481292018-02-01 Shape Optimization of Bone-Bonding Subperiosteal Devices with Finite Element Analysis Ogasawara, Takeshi Uezono, Masayoshi Takakuda, Kazuo Kikuchi, Masanori Suzuki, Shoichi Moriyama, Keiji Biomed Res Int Research Article Subperiosteal bone-bonding devices have been proposed for less invasive treatments in orthodontics. The device is osseointegrated onto a bone surface without fixation screws and is expected to rapidly attain a bone-bonding strength that successfully meets clinical performance. Hence, the device's optimum shape for rapid and strong bone bonding was examined in this study by finite element analyses. First, a stress analysis was performed for a circular rod device with an orthodontic force parallel to the bone surface, and the estimate of the bone-bonding strength based on the bone fracture criterion was verified with the results of an animal experiment. In total, four cross-sectional rod geometries were investigated: circular (Cr), elliptical (El), semicircular (Sc), and rectangular (Rc). By changing the height of the newly formed bone to mimic the progression of new bone formation, the estimation of the bone-bonding strength was repeated for each geometry. The rod with the Rc cross section exhibited the best performance, followed by those with the Sc, El, and Cr cross sections, from the aspects of the rapid acquisition of strength and the strength itself. Thus, the rectangular cross section is the best for rod-like subperiosteal devices for rapid bone bonding. Hindawi 2017 2017-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5748129/ /pubmed/29392133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3609062 Text en Copyright © 2017 Takeshi Ogasawara et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ogasawara, Takeshi
Uezono, Masayoshi
Takakuda, Kazuo
Kikuchi, Masanori
Suzuki, Shoichi
Moriyama, Keiji
Shape Optimization of Bone-Bonding Subperiosteal Devices with Finite Element Analysis
title Shape Optimization of Bone-Bonding Subperiosteal Devices with Finite Element Analysis
title_full Shape Optimization of Bone-Bonding Subperiosteal Devices with Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Shape Optimization of Bone-Bonding Subperiosteal Devices with Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Shape Optimization of Bone-Bonding Subperiosteal Devices with Finite Element Analysis
title_short Shape Optimization of Bone-Bonding Subperiosteal Devices with Finite Element Analysis
title_sort shape optimization of bone-bonding subperiosteal devices with finite element analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3609062
work_keys_str_mv AT ogasawaratakeshi shapeoptimizationofbonebondingsubperiostealdeviceswithfiniteelementanalysis
AT uezonomasayoshi shapeoptimizationofbonebondingsubperiostealdeviceswithfiniteelementanalysis
AT takakudakazuo shapeoptimizationofbonebondingsubperiostealdeviceswithfiniteelementanalysis
AT kikuchimasanori shapeoptimizationofbonebondingsubperiostealdeviceswithfiniteelementanalysis
AT suzukishoichi shapeoptimizationofbonebondingsubperiostealdeviceswithfiniteelementanalysis
AT moriyamakeiji shapeoptimizationofbonebondingsubperiostealdeviceswithfiniteelementanalysis