Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX) for treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: This study was a six-month, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, multicenter, pha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29119239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3831-6 |
_version_ | 1783289395040747520 |
---|---|
author | Li, Xiaoxin Wang, Ningli Liang, Xiaoling Xu, Gezhi Li, Xiao-Yan Jiao, Jenny Lou, Jean Hashad, Yehia |
author_facet | Li, Xiaoxin Wang, Ningli Liang, Xiaoling Xu, Gezhi Li, Xiao-Yan Jiao, Jenny Lou, Jean Hashad, Yehia |
author_sort | Li, Xiaoxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX) for treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: This study was a six-month, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial with a 2-month open-label study extension. Patients with branch or central RVO received DEX (n = 129) or sham procedure (n = 130) in the study eye at baseline; all patients who met re-treatment criteria received DEX at month 6. Efficacy measures included Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central retinal thickness (CRT) on optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Time to ≥15-letter BCVA improvement from baseline during the first 6 months (primary endpoint) was earlier with DEX than sham (p < 0.001). At month 2 (peak effect), the percentage of patients with ≥15-letter BCVA improvement from baseline was DEX: 35%, sham: 12%; mean BCVA change from baseline was DEX: +10.6 letters, sham: +1.7 letters; and mean CRT change from baseline was DEX: −407 μm, sham: −62 μm (all p < 0.001). Outcomes were better with DEX than sham in both branch and central RVO. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Increases in IOP generally were controlled with topical medication. Mean IOP normalized by month 4, and no patient required incisional glaucoma surgery. CONCLUSIONS: DEX had a favorable safety profile and provided clinically significant benefit in a Chinese patient population with RVO. Visual and anatomic outcomes were improved with DEX relative to sham for 3–4 months after a single implant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5748421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57484212018-01-19 Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study Li, Xiaoxin Wang, Ningli Liang, Xiaoling Xu, Gezhi Li, Xiao-Yan Jiao, Jenny Lou, Jean Hashad, Yehia Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Retinal Disorders PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX) for treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: This study was a six-month, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial with a 2-month open-label study extension. Patients with branch or central RVO received DEX (n = 129) or sham procedure (n = 130) in the study eye at baseline; all patients who met re-treatment criteria received DEX at month 6. Efficacy measures included Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central retinal thickness (CRT) on optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Time to ≥15-letter BCVA improvement from baseline during the first 6 months (primary endpoint) was earlier with DEX than sham (p < 0.001). At month 2 (peak effect), the percentage of patients with ≥15-letter BCVA improvement from baseline was DEX: 35%, sham: 12%; mean BCVA change from baseline was DEX: +10.6 letters, sham: +1.7 letters; and mean CRT change from baseline was DEX: −407 μm, sham: −62 μm (all p < 0.001). Outcomes were better with DEX than sham in both branch and central RVO. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Increases in IOP generally were controlled with topical medication. Mean IOP normalized by month 4, and no patient required incisional glaucoma surgery. CONCLUSIONS: DEX had a favorable safety profile and provided clinically significant benefit in a Chinese patient population with RVO. Visual and anatomic outcomes were improved with DEX relative to sham for 3–4 months after a single implant. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-11-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5748421/ /pubmed/29119239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3831-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Retinal Disorders Li, Xiaoxin Wang, Ningli Liang, Xiaoling Xu, Gezhi Li, Xiao-Yan Jiao, Jenny Lou, Jean Hashad, Yehia Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study |
title | Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study |
topic | Retinal Disorders |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29119239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3831-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lixiaoxin safetyandefficacyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfortreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusioninchinesepatientsrandomizedshamcontrolledmulticenterstudy AT wangningli safetyandefficacyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfortreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusioninchinesepatientsrandomizedshamcontrolledmulticenterstudy AT liangxiaoling safetyandefficacyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfortreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusioninchinesepatientsrandomizedshamcontrolledmulticenterstudy AT xugezhi safetyandefficacyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfortreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusioninchinesepatientsrandomizedshamcontrolledmulticenterstudy AT lixiaoyan safetyandefficacyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfortreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusioninchinesepatientsrandomizedshamcontrolledmulticenterstudy AT jiaojenny safetyandefficacyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfortreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusioninchinesepatientsrandomizedshamcontrolledmulticenterstudy AT loujean safetyandefficacyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfortreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusioninchinesepatientsrandomizedshamcontrolledmulticenterstudy AT hashadyehia safetyandefficacyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfortreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusioninchinesepatientsrandomizedshamcontrolledmulticenterstudy AT safetyandefficacyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfortreatmentofmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusioninchinesepatientsrandomizedshamcontrolledmulticenterstudy |