Cargando…

Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps

Commercial mobile apps for health behavior change are flourishing in the marketplace, but little evidence exists to support their use. This paper summarizes methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercially available health apps. Content analyses can be used to compare app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E, Silfee, Valerie J, Waring, Molly E, Boudreaux, Edwin D, Sadasivam, Rajani S, Mullen, Sean P, Carey, Jennifer L, Hayes, Rashelle B, Ding, Eric Y, Bennett, Gary G, Pagoto, Sherry L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29254914
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8758
_version_ 1783289405162651648
author Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E
Silfee, Valerie J
Waring, Molly E
Boudreaux, Edwin D
Sadasivam, Rajani S
Mullen, Sean P
Carey, Jennifer L
Hayes, Rashelle B
Ding, Eric Y
Bennett, Gary G
Pagoto, Sherry L
author_facet Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E
Silfee, Valerie J
Waring, Molly E
Boudreaux, Edwin D
Sadasivam, Rajani S
Mullen, Sean P
Carey, Jennifer L
Hayes, Rashelle B
Ding, Eric Y
Bennett, Gary G
Pagoto, Sherry L
author_sort Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E
collection PubMed
description Commercial mobile apps for health behavior change are flourishing in the marketplace, but little evidence exists to support their use. This paper summarizes methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercially available health apps. Content analyses can be used to compare app features with clinical guidelines, evidence-based protocols, and behavior change techniques. Usability testing can establish how well an app functions and serves its intended purpose for a target population. Observational studies can explore the association between use and clinical and behavioral outcomes. Finally, efficacy testing can establish whether a commercial app impacts an outcome of interest via a variety of study designs, including randomized trials, multiphase optimization studies, and N-of-1 studies. Evidence in all these forms would increase adoption of commercial apps in clinical practice, inform the development of the next generation of apps, and ultimately increase the impact of commercial apps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5748471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57484712018-01-08 Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E Silfee, Valerie J Waring, Molly E Boudreaux, Edwin D Sadasivam, Rajani S Mullen, Sean P Carey, Jennifer L Hayes, Rashelle B Ding, Eric Y Bennett, Gary G Pagoto, Sherry L JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Viewpoint Commercial mobile apps for health behavior change are flourishing in the marketplace, but little evidence exists to support their use. This paper summarizes methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercially available health apps. Content analyses can be used to compare app features with clinical guidelines, evidence-based protocols, and behavior change techniques. Usability testing can establish how well an app functions and serves its intended purpose for a target population. Observational studies can explore the association between use and clinical and behavioral outcomes. Finally, efficacy testing can establish whether a commercial app impacts an outcome of interest via a variety of study designs, including randomized trials, multiphase optimization studies, and N-of-1 studies. Evidence in all these forms would increase adoption of commercial apps in clinical practice, inform the development of the next generation of apps, and ultimately increase the impact of commercial apps. JMIR Publications 2017-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5748471/ /pubmed/29254914 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8758 Text en ©Danielle E Jake-Schoffman, Valerie J Silfee, Molly E Waring, Edwin D Boudreaux, Rajani S Sadasivam, Sean P Mullen, Jennifer L Carey, Rashelle B Hayes, Eric Y Ding, Gary G Bennett, Sherry L Pagoto. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 18.12.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E
Silfee, Valerie J
Waring, Molly E
Boudreaux, Edwin D
Sadasivam, Rajani S
Mullen, Sean P
Carey, Jennifer L
Hayes, Rashelle B
Ding, Eric Y
Bennett, Gary G
Pagoto, Sherry L
Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps
title Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps
title_full Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps
title_fullStr Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps
title_full_unstemmed Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps
title_short Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps
title_sort methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercial mobile health apps
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29254914
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8758
work_keys_str_mv AT jakeschoffmandaniellee methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps
AT silfeevaleriej methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps
AT waringmollye methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps
AT boudreauxedwind methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps
AT sadasivamrajanis methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps
AT mullenseanp methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps
AT careyjenniferl methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps
AT hayesrashelleb methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps
AT dingericy methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps
AT bennettgaryg methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps
AT pagotosherryl methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps