Cargando…
Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps
Commercial mobile apps for health behavior change are flourishing in the marketplace, but little evidence exists to support their use. This paper summarizes methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercially available health apps. Content analyses can be used to compare app...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29254914 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8758 |
_version_ | 1783289405162651648 |
---|---|
author | Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E Silfee, Valerie J Waring, Molly E Boudreaux, Edwin D Sadasivam, Rajani S Mullen, Sean P Carey, Jennifer L Hayes, Rashelle B Ding, Eric Y Bennett, Gary G Pagoto, Sherry L |
author_facet | Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E Silfee, Valerie J Waring, Molly E Boudreaux, Edwin D Sadasivam, Rajani S Mullen, Sean P Carey, Jennifer L Hayes, Rashelle B Ding, Eric Y Bennett, Gary G Pagoto, Sherry L |
author_sort | Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Commercial mobile apps for health behavior change are flourishing in the marketplace, but little evidence exists to support their use. This paper summarizes methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercially available health apps. Content analyses can be used to compare app features with clinical guidelines, evidence-based protocols, and behavior change techniques. Usability testing can establish how well an app functions and serves its intended purpose for a target population. Observational studies can explore the association between use and clinical and behavioral outcomes. Finally, efficacy testing can establish whether a commercial app impacts an outcome of interest via a variety of study designs, including randomized trials, multiphase optimization studies, and N-of-1 studies. Evidence in all these forms would increase adoption of commercial apps in clinical practice, inform the development of the next generation of apps, and ultimately increase the impact of commercial apps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5748471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57484712018-01-08 Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E Silfee, Valerie J Waring, Molly E Boudreaux, Edwin D Sadasivam, Rajani S Mullen, Sean P Carey, Jennifer L Hayes, Rashelle B Ding, Eric Y Bennett, Gary G Pagoto, Sherry L JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Viewpoint Commercial mobile apps for health behavior change are flourishing in the marketplace, but little evidence exists to support their use. This paper summarizes methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercially available health apps. Content analyses can be used to compare app features with clinical guidelines, evidence-based protocols, and behavior change techniques. Usability testing can establish how well an app functions and serves its intended purpose for a target population. Observational studies can explore the association between use and clinical and behavioral outcomes. Finally, efficacy testing can establish whether a commercial app impacts an outcome of interest via a variety of study designs, including randomized trials, multiphase optimization studies, and N-of-1 studies. Evidence in all these forms would increase adoption of commercial apps in clinical practice, inform the development of the next generation of apps, and ultimately increase the impact of commercial apps. JMIR Publications 2017-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5748471/ /pubmed/29254914 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8758 Text en ©Danielle E Jake-Schoffman, Valerie J Silfee, Molly E Waring, Edwin D Boudreaux, Rajani S Sadasivam, Sean P Mullen, Jennifer L Carey, Rashelle B Hayes, Eric Y Ding, Gary G Bennett, Sherry L Pagoto. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 18.12.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E Silfee, Valerie J Waring, Molly E Boudreaux, Edwin D Sadasivam, Rajani S Mullen, Sean P Carey, Jennifer L Hayes, Rashelle B Ding, Eric Y Bennett, Gary G Pagoto, Sherry L Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps |
title | Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps |
title_full | Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps |
title_fullStr | Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps |
title_short | Methods for Evaluating the Content, Usability, and Efficacy of Commercial Mobile Health Apps |
title_sort | methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercial mobile health apps |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5748471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29254914 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jakeschoffmandaniellee methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps AT silfeevaleriej methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps AT waringmollye methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps AT boudreauxedwind methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps AT sadasivamrajanis methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps AT mullenseanp methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps AT careyjenniferl methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps AT hayesrashelleb methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps AT dingericy methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps AT bennettgaryg methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps AT pagotosherryl methodsforevaluatingthecontentusabilityandefficacyofcommercialmobilehealthapps |