Cargando…
Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive ventral rectopexy is a well-described technique for management of rectal prolapse. Robotic system has proven its advantage for surgeries in the pelvis. Applying this technique, ventral rectopexy can be done more precisely with minimal recurrence. With growing experienc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28782744 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_241_16 |
_version_ | 1783289547778424832 |
---|---|
author | Swain, Sudeepta Kumar Kollu, Sri Harsha Patooru, Vijaya Kumar Munikrishnan, Venkatesh |
author_facet | Swain, Sudeepta Kumar Kollu, Sri Harsha Patooru, Vijaya Kumar Munikrishnan, Venkatesh |
author_sort | Swain, Sudeepta Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive ventral rectopexy is a well-described technique for management of rectal prolapse. Robotic system has proven its advantage for surgeries in the pelvis. Applying this technique, ventral rectopexy can be done more precisely with minimal recurrence. With growing experience, the operative duration and cost of robotic ventral rectopexy can be reduced with better outcome. Few case studies have been described in literature with no study from Indian subcontinent. We describe a series of eight cases of robotic ventral rectopexy done for rectal prolapse in a tertiary health-care centre of India. METHODS: A total of 8 patients were operated for complete rectal prolapse during the period from August 2015 to April 2016. da Vinci Si robotic surgical system was used with prolene or permacol mesh for ventral rectopexy. All patients were prospectively followed for a period minimum of 3 months. Pre- and intra-operative findings were recorded along with post-operative outcome. RESULTS: Out of eight patients, prolene mesh was used in five patients and permacol mesh (porcine collagen) in three patients. Mean operative time (console time) was 177 min and mean total time was 218 min. Mean blood loss was 23.7 ml. Functional outcome was satisfactory in all patients. There was no significant complication in any patient with mean hospital stay of 2.2 days. With average follow-up of 8.8 months, no patient had recurrence. CONCLUSION: Robotic ventral rectopexy is a safe technique for rectal prolapse with excellent result in terms of functional outcome, recurrence and complications. With experience, the duration and cost can be comparable to laparoscopic technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5749195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57491952018-01-04 Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature Swain, Sudeepta Kumar Kollu, Sri Harsha Patooru, Vijaya Kumar Munikrishnan, Venkatesh J Minim Access Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive ventral rectopexy is a well-described technique for management of rectal prolapse. Robotic system has proven its advantage for surgeries in the pelvis. Applying this technique, ventral rectopexy can be done more precisely with minimal recurrence. With growing experience, the operative duration and cost of robotic ventral rectopexy can be reduced with better outcome. Few case studies have been described in literature with no study from Indian subcontinent. We describe a series of eight cases of robotic ventral rectopexy done for rectal prolapse in a tertiary health-care centre of India. METHODS: A total of 8 patients were operated for complete rectal prolapse during the period from August 2015 to April 2016. da Vinci Si robotic surgical system was used with prolene or permacol mesh for ventral rectopexy. All patients were prospectively followed for a period minimum of 3 months. Pre- and intra-operative findings were recorded along with post-operative outcome. RESULTS: Out of eight patients, prolene mesh was used in five patients and permacol mesh (porcine collagen) in three patients. Mean operative time (console time) was 177 min and mean total time was 218 min. Mean blood loss was 23.7 ml. Functional outcome was satisfactory in all patients. There was no significant complication in any patient with mean hospital stay of 2.2 days. With average follow-up of 8.8 months, no patient had recurrence. CONCLUSION: Robotic ventral rectopexy is a safe technique for rectal prolapse with excellent result in terms of functional outcome, recurrence and complications. With experience, the duration and cost can be comparable to laparoscopic technique. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5749195/ /pubmed/28782744 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_241_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Swain, Sudeepta Kumar Kollu, Sri Harsha Patooru, Vijaya Kumar Munikrishnan, Venkatesh Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature |
title | Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature |
title_full | Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature |
title_fullStr | Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature |
title_short | Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature |
title_sort | robotic ventral rectopexy: initial experience in an indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28782744 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_241_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swainsudeeptakumar roboticventralrectopexyinitialexperienceinanindiantertiaryhealthcarecentreandreviewofliterature AT kollusriharsha roboticventralrectopexyinitialexperienceinanindiantertiaryhealthcarecentreandreviewofliterature AT patooruvijayakumar roboticventralrectopexyinitialexperienceinanindiantertiaryhealthcarecentreandreviewofliterature AT munikrishnanvenkatesh roboticventralrectopexyinitialexperienceinanindiantertiaryhealthcarecentreandreviewofliterature |