Cargando…
3 Tesla breast MR imaging as a problem-solving tool: Diagnostic performance and incidental lesions
PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic performance and incidental lesion yield of 3T breast MRI if used as a problem-solving tool. METHODS: This retrospective, IRB-approved, cross-sectional, single-center study comprised 302 consecutive women (mean: 50±12 years; range: 20–79 years) who were undergoi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190287 |
_version_ | 1783289628534505472 |
---|---|
author | Spick, Claudio Szolar, Dieter H. M. Preidler, Klaus W. Reittner, Pia Rauch, Katharina Brader, Peter Tillich, Manfred Baltzer, Pascal A. |
author_facet | Spick, Claudio Szolar, Dieter H. M. Preidler, Klaus W. Reittner, Pia Rauch, Katharina Brader, Peter Tillich, Manfred Baltzer, Pascal A. |
author_sort | Spick, Claudio |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic performance and incidental lesion yield of 3T breast MRI if used as a problem-solving tool. METHODS: This retrospective, IRB-approved, cross-sectional, single-center study comprised 302 consecutive women (mean: 50±12 years; range: 20–79 years) who were undergoing 3T breast MRI between 03/2013-12/2014 for further workup of conventional and clinical breast findings. Images were read by experienced, board-certified radiologists. The reference standard was histopathology or follow-up ≥ two years. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated. Results were stratified by conventional and clinical breast findings. RESULTS: The reference standard revealed 53 true-positive, 243 true-negative, 20 false-positive, and two false-negative breast MRI findings, resulting in a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 96.4% (53/55), 92.4% (243/263), 72.6% (53/73), and 99.2% (243/245), respectively. In 5.3% (16/302) of all patients, incidental MRI lesions classified BI-RADS 3–5 were detected, 37.5% (6/16) of which were malignant. Breast composition and the imaging findings that had led to referral had no significant influence on the diagnostic performance of breast MR imaging (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: 3T breast MRI yields excellent diagnostic results if used as a problem-solving tool independent of referral reasons. The number of suspicious incidental lesions detected by MRI is low, but is associated with a substantial malignancy rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5749752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57497522018-01-26 3 Tesla breast MR imaging as a problem-solving tool: Diagnostic performance and incidental lesions Spick, Claudio Szolar, Dieter H. M. Preidler, Klaus W. Reittner, Pia Rauch, Katharina Brader, Peter Tillich, Manfred Baltzer, Pascal A. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic performance and incidental lesion yield of 3T breast MRI if used as a problem-solving tool. METHODS: This retrospective, IRB-approved, cross-sectional, single-center study comprised 302 consecutive women (mean: 50±12 years; range: 20–79 years) who were undergoing 3T breast MRI between 03/2013-12/2014 for further workup of conventional and clinical breast findings. Images were read by experienced, board-certified radiologists. The reference standard was histopathology or follow-up ≥ two years. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated. Results were stratified by conventional and clinical breast findings. RESULTS: The reference standard revealed 53 true-positive, 243 true-negative, 20 false-positive, and two false-negative breast MRI findings, resulting in a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 96.4% (53/55), 92.4% (243/263), 72.6% (53/73), and 99.2% (243/245), respectively. In 5.3% (16/302) of all patients, incidental MRI lesions classified BI-RADS 3–5 were detected, 37.5% (6/16) of which were malignant. Breast composition and the imaging findings that had led to referral had no significant influence on the diagnostic performance of breast MR imaging (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: 3T breast MRI yields excellent diagnostic results if used as a problem-solving tool independent of referral reasons. The number of suspicious incidental lesions detected by MRI is low, but is associated with a substantial malignancy rate. Public Library of Science 2018-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5749752/ /pubmed/29293582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190287 Text en © 2018 Spick et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Spick, Claudio Szolar, Dieter H. M. Preidler, Klaus W. Reittner, Pia Rauch, Katharina Brader, Peter Tillich, Manfred Baltzer, Pascal A. 3 Tesla breast MR imaging as a problem-solving tool: Diagnostic performance and incidental lesions |
title | 3 Tesla breast MR imaging as a problem-solving tool: Diagnostic performance and incidental lesions |
title_full | 3 Tesla breast MR imaging as a problem-solving tool: Diagnostic performance and incidental lesions |
title_fullStr | 3 Tesla breast MR imaging as a problem-solving tool: Diagnostic performance and incidental lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | 3 Tesla breast MR imaging as a problem-solving tool: Diagnostic performance and incidental lesions |
title_short | 3 Tesla breast MR imaging as a problem-solving tool: Diagnostic performance and incidental lesions |
title_sort | 3 tesla breast mr imaging as a problem-solving tool: diagnostic performance and incidental lesions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spickclaudio 3teslabreastmrimagingasaproblemsolvingtooldiagnosticperformanceandincidentallesions AT szolardieterhm 3teslabreastmrimagingasaproblemsolvingtooldiagnosticperformanceandincidentallesions AT preidlerklausw 3teslabreastmrimagingasaproblemsolvingtooldiagnosticperformanceandincidentallesions AT reittnerpia 3teslabreastmrimagingasaproblemsolvingtooldiagnosticperformanceandincidentallesions AT rauchkatharina 3teslabreastmrimagingasaproblemsolvingtooldiagnosticperformanceandincidentallesions AT braderpeter 3teslabreastmrimagingasaproblemsolvingtooldiagnosticperformanceandincidentallesions AT tillichmanfred 3teslabreastmrimagingasaproblemsolvingtooldiagnosticperformanceandincidentallesions AT baltzerpascala 3teslabreastmrimagingasaproblemsolvingtooldiagnosticperformanceandincidentallesions |