Cargando…

Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations

The 3D orientation of clasts within a deposit are known to be informative on processes that formed that deposit. In archaeological sites, a portion of the clasts in the deposit are introduced by non-geological processes, and these are typically systematically recorded in archaeological excavations w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: McPherron, Shannon P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190195
_version_ 1783289631532384256
author McPherron, Shannon P.
author_facet McPherron, Shannon P.
author_sort McPherron, Shannon P.
collection PubMed
description The 3D orientation of clasts within a deposit are known to be informative on processes that formed that deposit. In archaeological sites, a portion of the clasts in the deposit are introduced by non-geological processes, and these are typically systematically recorded in archaeological excavations with total stations. By recording a second point on elongated clasts it is possible to quickly and precisely capture their orientation. The statistical and graphical techniques for analyzing these data are well published, and there is a growing set of actualistic and archaeological comparative data to help with the interpretation of the documented patterns. This paper advances this area of research in presenting methods to address some shortcomings in current methodologies. First, a method for calculating confidence intervals on orientation statistics is presented to help address the question of how many objects are needed to assess the formation of a deposit based on orientations. Second, a method for assessing the probability that two assemblages have different orientations is presented based on permutations testing. This method differs from existing ones in that it considers three-dimensional orientations rather than working separately with the two-dimensional bearing and plunge components. Third, a method is presented to examine spatial variability in orientations based on a moving windows approach. The raw data plus the R code to build this document and to implement these methods plus those already described by McPherron are included to help further their use in assessing archaeological site formation processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5749765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57497652018-01-26 Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations McPherron, Shannon P. PLoS One Research Article The 3D orientation of clasts within a deposit are known to be informative on processes that formed that deposit. In archaeological sites, a portion of the clasts in the deposit are introduced by non-geological processes, and these are typically systematically recorded in archaeological excavations with total stations. By recording a second point on elongated clasts it is possible to quickly and precisely capture their orientation. The statistical and graphical techniques for analyzing these data are well published, and there is a growing set of actualistic and archaeological comparative data to help with the interpretation of the documented patterns. This paper advances this area of research in presenting methods to address some shortcomings in current methodologies. First, a method for calculating confidence intervals on orientation statistics is presented to help address the question of how many objects are needed to assess the formation of a deposit based on orientations. Second, a method for assessing the probability that two assemblages have different orientations is presented based on permutations testing. This method differs from existing ones in that it considers three-dimensional orientations rather than working separately with the two-dimensional bearing and plunge components. Third, a method is presented to examine spatial variability in orientations based on a moving windows approach. The raw data plus the R code to build this document and to implement these methods plus those already described by McPherron are included to help further their use in assessing archaeological site formation processes. Public Library of Science 2018-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5749765/ /pubmed/29293573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190195 Text en © 2018 Shannon P. McPherron http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McPherron, Shannon P.
Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations
title Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations
title_full Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations
title_fullStr Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations
title_full_unstemmed Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations
title_short Additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations
title_sort additional statistical and graphical methods for analyzing site formation processes using artifact orientations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190195
work_keys_str_mv AT mcpherronshannonp additionalstatisticalandgraphicalmethodsforanalyzingsiteformationprocessesusingartifactorientations