Cargando…

Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos

There has been much research on sex differences in the ability to recognise facial expressions of emotions, with results generally showing a female advantage in reading emotional expressions from the face. However, most of the research to date has used static images and/or ‘extreme’ examples of faci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wingenbach, Tanja S. H., Ashwin, Chris, Brosnan, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190634
_version_ 1783289650943623168
author Wingenbach, Tanja S. H.
Ashwin, Chris
Brosnan, Mark
author_facet Wingenbach, Tanja S. H.
Ashwin, Chris
Brosnan, Mark
author_sort Wingenbach, Tanja S. H.
collection PubMed
description There has been much research on sex differences in the ability to recognise facial expressions of emotions, with results generally showing a female advantage in reading emotional expressions from the face. However, most of the research to date has used static images and/or ‘extreme’ examples of facial expressions. Therefore, little is known about how expression intensity and dynamic stimuli might affect the commonly reported female advantage in facial emotion recognition. The current study investigated sex differences in accuracy of response (H(u); unbiased hit rates) and response latencies for emotion recognition using short video stimuli (1sec) of 10 different facial emotion expressions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness, surprise, happiness, contempt, pride, embarrassment, neutral) across three variations in the intensity of the emotional expression (low, intermediate, high) in an adolescent and adult sample (N = 111; 51 male, 60 female) aged between 16 and 45 (M = 22.2, SD = 5.7). Overall, females showed more accurate facial emotion recognition compared to males and were faster in correctly recognising facial emotions. The female advantage in reading expressions from the faces of others was unaffected by expression intensity levels and emotion categories used in the study. The effects were specific to recognition of emotions, as males and females did not differ in the recognition of neutral faces. Together, the results showed a robust sex difference favouring females in facial emotion recognition using video stimuli of a wide range of emotions and expression intensity variations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5749848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57498482018-01-26 Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos Wingenbach, Tanja S. H. Ashwin, Chris Brosnan, Mark PLoS One Research Article There has been much research on sex differences in the ability to recognise facial expressions of emotions, with results generally showing a female advantage in reading emotional expressions from the face. However, most of the research to date has used static images and/or ‘extreme’ examples of facial expressions. Therefore, little is known about how expression intensity and dynamic stimuli might affect the commonly reported female advantage in facial emotion recognition. The current study investigated sex differences in accuracy of response (H(u); unbiased hit rates) and response latencies for emotion recognition using short video stimuli (1sec) of 10 different facial emotion expressions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness, surprise, happiness, contempt, pride, embarrassment, neutral) across three variations in the intensity of the emotional expression (low, intermediate, high) in an adolescent and adult sample (N = 111; 51 male, 60 female) aged between 16 and 45 (M = 22.2, SD = 5.7). Overall, females showed more accurate facial emotion recognition compared to males and were faster in correctly recognising facial emotions. The female advantage in reading expressions from the faces of others was unaffected by expression intensity levels and emotion categories used in the study. The effects were specific to recognition of emotions, as males and females did not differ in the recognition of neutral faces. Together, the results showed a robust sex difference favouring females in facial emotion recognition using video stimuli of a wide range of emotions and expression intensity variations. Public Library of Science 2018-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5749848/ /pubmed/29293674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190634 Text en © 2018 Wingenbach et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wingenbach, Tanja S. H.
Ashwin, Chris
Brosnan, Mark
Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos
title Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos
title_full Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos
title_fullStr Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos
title_short Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos
title_sort sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190634
work_keys_str_mv AT wingenbachtanjash sexdifferencesinfacialemotionrecognitionacrossvaryingexpressionintensitylevelsfromvideos
AT ashwinchris sexdifferencesinfacialemotionrecognitionacrossvaryingexpressionintensitylevelsfromvideos
AT brosnanmark sexdifferencesinfacialemotionrecognitionacrossvaryingexpressionintensitylevelsfromvideos