Cargando…
Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos
There has been much research on sex differences in the ability to recognise facial expressions of emotions, with results generally showing a female advantage in reading emotional expressions from the face. However, most of the research to date has used static images and/or ‘extreme’ examples of faci...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190634 |
_version_ | 1783289650943623168 |
---|---|
author | Wingenbach, Tanja S. H. Ashwin, Chris Brosnan, Mark |
author_facet | Wingenbach, Tanja S. H. Ashwin, Chris Brosnan, Mark |
author_sort | Wingenbach, Tanja S. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There has been much research on sex differences in the ability to recognise facial expressions of emotions, with results generally showing a female advantage in reading emotional expressions from the face. However, most of the research to date has used static images and/or ‘extreme’ examples of facial expressions. Therefore, little is known about how expression intensity and dynamic stimuli might affect the commonly reported female advantage in facial emotion recognition. The current study investigated sex differences in accuracy of response (H(u); unbiased hit rates) and response latencies for emotion recognition using short video stimuli (1sec) of 10 different facial emotion expressions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness, surprise, happiness, contempt, pride, embarrassment, neutral) across three variations in the intensity of the emotional expression (low, intermediate, high) in an adolescent and adult sample (N = 111; 51 male, 60 female) aged between 16 and 45 (M = 22.2, SD = 5.7). Overall, females showed more accurate facial emotion recognition compared to males and were faster in correctly recognising facial emotions. The female advantage in reading expressions from the faces of others was unaffected by expression intensity levels and emotion categories used in the study. The effects were specific to recognition of emotions, as males and females did not differ in the recognition of neutral faces. Together, the results showed a robust sex difference favouring females in facial emotion recognition using video stimuli of a wide range of emotions and expression intensity variations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5749848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57498482018-01-26 Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos Wingenbach, Tanja S. H. Ashwin, Chris Brosnan, Mark PLoS One Research Article There has been much research on sex differences in the ability to recognise facial expressions of emotions, with results generally showing a female advantage in reading emotional expressions from the face. However, most of the research to date has used static images and/or ‘extreme’ examples of facial expressions. Therefore, little is known about how expression intensity and dynamic stimuli might affect the commonly reported female advantage in facial emotion recognition. The current study investigated sex differences in accuracy of response (H(u); unbiased hit rates) and response latencies for emotion recognition using short video stimuli (1sec) of 10 different facial emotion expressions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness, surprise, happiness, contempt, pride, embarrassment, neutral) across three variations in the intensity of the emotional expression (low, intermediate, high) in an adolescent and adult sample (N = 111; 51 male, 60 female) aged between 16 and 45 (M = 22.2, SD = 5.7). Overall, females showed more accurate facial emotion recognition compared to males and were faster in correctly recognising facial emotions. The female advantage in reading expressions from the faces of others was unaffected by expression intensity levels and emotion categories used in the study. The effects were specific to recognition of emotions, as males and females did not differ in the recognition of neutral faces. Together, the results showed a robust sex difference favouring females in facial emotion recognition using video stimuli of a wide range of emotions and expression intensity variations. Public Library of Science 2018-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5749848/ /pubmed/29293674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190634 Text en © 2018 Wingenbach et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wingenbach, Tanja S. H. Ashwin, Chris Brosnan, Mark Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos |
title | Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos |
title_full | Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos |
title_short | Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos |
title_sort | sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190634 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wingenbachtanjash sexdifferencesinfacialemotionrecognitionacrossvaryingexpressionintensitylevelsfromvideos AT ashwinchris sexdifferencesinfacialemotionrecognitionacrossvaryingexpressionintensitylevelsfromvideos AT brosnanmark sexdifferencesinfacialemotionrecognitionacrossvaryingexpressionintensitylevelsfromvideos |