Cargando…
Promoting and improving three Rs practice: the Korean guidelines
Scientists planning research that involves the use of animals are required to examine the possibilities for replacement, reduction, or refinement (the Three Rs), and their protocol must be reviewed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Good scientific practice involving appropriate sea...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187280 http://dx.doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2017.50.12.225 |
_version_ | 1783289663448940544 |
---|---|
author | Choe, Byung In Lee, Gwi Hyang |
author_facet | Choe, Byung In Lee, Gwi Hyang |
author_sort | Choe, Byung In |
collection | PubMed |
description | Scientists planning research that involves the use of animals are required to examine the possibilities for replacement, reduction, or refinement (the Three Rs), and their protocol must be reviewed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Good scientific practice involving appropriate search techniques on the available Three Rs resources is essential for both ethical and scientific reasons. Appropriate experimental design and statistical analysis techniques are particularly necessary for research involving the use of animals, because this can improve animal welfare and scientific outcomes, as well as saving animal lives. There are a number of resources to help researchers improve their search techniques, experimental design strategies, and their reporting of research involving the use of animals. However, there is little specific information or resources on the Three Rs alternatives that is readily available in the Korean language. This paper outlines the common errors made by submitting researchers that have been repeatedly observed during the ethical review of experimental protocols over the last ten years, and provides information on the Korean resources available to promote good scientific practice. This could help to bridge the gap between Korean scientists and animal welfare advocates assisting scientists to improve ethical considerations and conduct responsible research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5749906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57499062018-01-18 Promoting and improving three Rs practice: the Korean guidelines Choe, Byung In Lee, Gwi Hyang BMB Rep Invited Mini Review Scientists planning research that involves the use of animals are required to examine the possibilities for replacement, reduction, or refinement (the Three Rs), and their protocol must be reviewed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Good scientific practice involving appropriate search techniques on the available Three Rs resources is essential for both ethical and scientific reasons. Appropriate experimental design and statistical analysis techniques are particularly necessary for research involving the use of animals, because this can improve animal welfare and scientific outcomes, as well as saving animal lives. There are a number of resources to help researchers improve their search techniques, experimental design strategies, and their reporting of research involving the use of animals. However, there is little specific information or resources on the Three Rs alternatives that is readily available in the Korean language. This paper outlines the common errors made by submitting researchers that have been repeatedly observed during the ethical review of experimental protocols over the last ten years, and provides information on the Korean resources available to promote good scientific practice. This could help to bridge the gap between Korean scientists and animal welfare advocates assisting scientists to improve ethical considerations and conduct responsible research. Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2017-12 2017-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5749906/ /pubmed/29187280 http://dx.doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2017.50.12.225 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the The Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Mini Review Choe, Byung In Lee, Gwi Hyang Promoting and improving three Rs practice: the Korean guidelines |
title | Promoting and improving three Rs practice: the Korean guidelines |
title_full | Promoting and improving three Rs practice: the Korean guidelines |
title_fullStr | Promoting and improving three Rs practice: the Korean guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Promoting and improving three Rs practice: the Korean guidelines |
title_short | Promoting and improving three Rs practice: the Korean guidelines |
title_sort | promoting and improving three rs practice: the korean guidelines |
topic | Invited Mini Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187280 http://dx.doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2017.50.12.225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choebyungin promotingandimprovingthreerspracticethekoreanguidelines AT leegwihyang promotingandimprovingthreerspracticethekoreanguidelines |