Cargando…
The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p-values
We wish to answer this question: If you observe a ‘significant’ p-value after doing a single unbiased experiment, what is the probability that your result is a false positive? The weak evidence provided by p-values between 0.01 and 0.05 is explored by exact calculations of false positive risks. When...
Autor principal: | Colquhoun, David |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29308247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171085 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A response to critiques of ‘The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p-values’
por: Colquhoun, David
Publicado: (2019) -
Correction to ‘The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p-values'
por: Colquhoun, David
Publicado: (2018) -
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values
por: Colquhoun, David
Publicado: (2014) -
A counterview of ‘An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values’ by Colquhoun (2014)
por: Loiselle, D., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Misinterpretations of P-values and statistical tests persists among researchers and professionals working with statistics and epidemiology
por: Lytsy, Per, et al.
Publicado: (2022)