Cargando…

Users’ experiences of an online intervention for bipolar disorder: important lessons for design and evaluation

BACKGROUND: The evidence base for digital interventions for physical and mental health, including severe and enduring mental health difficulties, is increasing. In a feasibility trial, web-based Enhanced Relapse Prevention (ERPonline) for bipolar disorder demonstrated high recruitment and retention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dodd, Alyson L, Mallinson, Sara, Griffiths, Martin, Morriss, Richard, Jones, Steven H, Lobban, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29061886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102754
_version_ 1783289715871449088
author Dodd, Alyson L
Mallinson, Sara
Griffiths, Martin
Morriss, Richard
Jones, Steven H
Lobban, Fiona
author_facet Dodd, Alyson L
Mallinson, Sara
Griffiths, Martin
Morriss, Richard
Jones, Steven H
Lobban, Fiona
author_sort Dodd, Alyson L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evidence base for digital interventions for physical and mental health, including severe and enduring mental health difficulties, is increasing. In a feasibility trial, web-based Enhanced Relapse Prevention (ERPonline) for bipolar disorder demonstrated high recruitment and retention rates. Relative to participants in the waitlist control group, those who received ERPonline showed increased monitoring for early warning signs of relapse and had developed more positive illness models. OBJECTIVE: To understand users’ motivations and barriers for taking part in an online/telephone-based trial, and for engagement with ERPonline. METHODS: Participants from the trial who had been allocated to receive ERPonline were purposively sampled to participate in telephone-based, in-depth qualitative interviews about their experiences. Interviews (n=19) were analysed using framework analysis to identify themes relevant to study aims. FINDINGS: Participants took part due to the convenient, flexible and rewarding aspects of the trial design, as well as a desire to improve the mental health of themselves and others. Barriers included extensive assessments, practical difficulties and mood. ERPonline was was generally considered to be accessible, relevant and straightforward, but there were individual preferences regarding design, content and who it was for. Several participants reported positive changes, but there was a sense that digital interventions should not replace routine care. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of barriers and facilitators to consider when evaluating and implementing digital interventions. Individual preferences and human contact were key factors for both trial design and engagement with an online intervention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Digital interventions should be co-produced, personalised, interactive and embedded as one component in a broader package of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN56908625; Post-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5750409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57504092018-02-12 Users’ experiences of an online intervention for bipolar disorder: important lessons for design and evaluation Dodd, Alyson L Mallinson, Sara Griffiths, Martin Morriss, Richard Jones, Steven H Lobban, Fiona Evid Based Ment Health Original Article BACKGROUND: The evidence base for digital interventions for physical and mental health, including severe and enduring mental health difficulties, is increasing. In a feasibility trial, web-based Enhanced Relapse Prevention (ERPonline) for bipolar disorder demonstrated high recruitment and retention rates. Relative to participants in the waitlist control group, those who received ERPonline showed increased monitoring for early warning signs of relapse and had developed more positive illness models. OBJECTIVE: To understand users’ motivations and barriers for taking part in an online/telephone-based trial, and for engagement with ERPonline. METHODS: Participants from the trial who had been allocated to receive ERPonline were purposively sampled to participate in telephone-based, in-depth qualitative interviews about their experiences. Interviews (n=19) were analysed using framework analysis to identify themes relevant to study aims. FINDINGS: Participants took part due to the convenient, flexible and rewarding aspects of the trial design, as well as a desire to improve the mental health of themselves and others. Barriers included extensive assessments, practical difficulties and mood. ERPonline was was generally considered to be accessible, relevant and straightforward, but there were individual preferences regarding design, content and who it was for. Several participants reported positive changes, but there was a sense that digital interventions should not replace routine care. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of barriers and facilitators to consider when evaluating and implementing digital interventions. Individual preferences and human contact were key factors for both trial design and engagement with an online intervention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Digital interventions should be co-produced, personalised, interactive and embedded as one component in a broader package of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN56908625; Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11 2017-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5750409/ /pubmed/29061886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102754 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Dodd, Alyson L
Mallinson, Sara
Griffiths, Martin
Morriss, Richard
Jones, Steven H
Lobban, Fiona
Users’ experiences of an online intervention for bipolar disorder: important lessons for design and evaluation
title Users’ experiences of an online intervention for bipolar disorder: important lessons for design and evaluation
title_full Users’ experiences of an online intervention for bipolar disorder: important lessons for design and evaluation
title_fullStr Users’ experiences of an online intervention for bipolar disorder: important lessons for design and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Users’ experiences of an online intervention for bipolar disorder: important lessons for design and evaluation
title_short Users’ experiences of an online intervention for bipolar disorder: important lessons for design and evaluation
title_sort users’ experiences of an online intervention for bipolar disorder: important lessons for design and evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29061886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102754
work_keys_str_mv AT doddalysonl usersexperiencesofanonlineinterventionforbipolardisorderimportantlessonsfordesignandevaluation
AT mallinsonsara usersexperiencesofanonlineinterventionforbipolardisorderimportantlessonsfordesignandevaluation
AT griffithsmartin usersexperiencesofanonlineinterventionforbipolardisorderimportantlessonsfordesignandevaluation
AT morrissrichard usersexperiencesofanonlineinterventionforbipolardisorderimportantlessonsfordesignandevaluation
AT jonesstevenh usersexperiencesofanonlineinterventionforbipolardisorderimportantlessonsfordesignandevaluation
AT lobbanfiona usersexperiencesofanonlineinterventionforbipolardisorderimportantlessonsfordesignandevaluation