Cargando…

Optimising impact and sustainability: a qualitative process evaluation of a complex intervention targeted at compassionate care

BACKGROUND: Despite concerns about the degree of compassion in contemporary healthcare, there is a dearth of evidence for health service managers about how to promote compassionate healthcare. This paper reports on the implementation of the Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care (CLEC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bridges, Jackie, May, Carl, Fuller, Alison, Griffiths, Peter, Wigley, Wendy, Gould, Lisa, Barker, Hannah, Libberton, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28916581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006702
_version_ 1783289721518030848
author Bridges, Jackie
May, Carl
Fuller, Alison
Griffiths, Peter
Wigley, Wendy
Gould, Lisa
Barker, Hannah
Libberton, Paula
author_facet Bridges, Jackie
May, Carl
Fuller, Alison
Griffiths, Peter
Wigley, Wendy
Gould, Lisa
Barker, Hannah
Libberton, Paula
author_sort Bridges, Jackie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite concerns about the degree of compassion in contemporary healthcare, there is a dearth of evidence for health service managers about how to promote compassionate healthcare. This paper reports on the implementation of the Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care (CLECC) intervention by four hospital ward nursing teams. CLECC is a workplace educational intervention focused on developing sustainable leadership and work-team practices designed to support team relational capacity and compassionate care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To identify and explain the extent to which CLECC was implemented into existing work practices by nursing staff, and to inform conclusions about how such interventions can be optimised to support compassionate care in acute settings. METHODS: Process evaluation guided by normalisation process theory. Data gathered included staff interviews (n=47), observations (n=7 over 26 hours) and ward manager questionnaires on staffing (n=4). RESULTS: Frontline staff were keen to participate in CLECC, were able to implement many of the planned activities and valued the benefits to their well-being and to patient care. Nonetheless, factors outside of the direct influence of the ward teams mediated the impact and sustainability of the intervention. These factors included an organisational culture focused on tasks and targets that constrained opportunities for staff mutual support and learning. CONCLUSIONS: Relational work in caregiving organisations depends on individual caregiver agency and on whether or not this work is adequately supported by resources, norms and relationships located in the wider system. High cognitive participation in compassionate nursing care interventions such as CLECC by senior nurse managers is likely to result in improved impact and sustainability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5750433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57504332018-02-12 Optimising impact and sustainability: a qualitative process evaluation of a complex intervention targeted at compassionate care Bridges, Jackie May, Carl Fuller, Alison Griffiths, Peter Wigley, Wendy Gould, Lisa Barker, Hannah Libberton, Paula BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Despite concerns about the degree of compassion in contemporary healthcare, there is a dearth of evidence for health service managers about how to promote compassionate healthcare. This paper reports on the implementation of the Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care (CLECC) intervention by four hospital ward nursing teams. CLECC is a workplace educational intervention focused on developing sustainable leadership and work-team practices designed to support team relational capacity and compassionate care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To identify and explain the extent to which CLECC was implemented into existing work practices by nursing staff, and to inform conclusions about how such interventions can be optimised to support compassionate care in acute settings. METHODS: Process evaluation guided by normalisation process theory. Data gathered included staff interviews (n=47), observations (n=7 over 26 hours) and ward manager questionnaires on staffing (n=4). RESULTS: Frontline staff were keen to participate in CLECC, were able to implement many of the planned activities and valued the benefits to their well-being and to patient care. Nonetheless, factors outside of the direct influence of the ward teams mediated the impact and sustainability of the intervention. These factors included an organisational culture focused on tasks and targets that constrained opportunities for staff mutual support and learning. CONCLUSIONS: Relational work in caregiving organisations depends on individual caregiver agency and on whether or not this work is adequately supported by resources, norms and relationships located in the wider system. High cognitive participation in compassionate nursing care interventions such as CLECC by senior nurse managers is likely to result in improved impact and sustainability. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12 2017-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5750433/ /pubmed/28916581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006702 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Bridges, Jackie
May, Carl
Fuller, Alison
Griffiths, Peter
Wigley, Wendy
Gould, Lisa
Barker, Hannah
Libberton, Paula
Optimising impact and sustainability: a qualitative process evaluation of a complex intervention targeted at compassionate care
title Optimising impact and sustainability: a qualitative process evaluation of a complex intervention targeted at compassionate care
title_full Optimising impact and sustainability: a qualitative process evaluation of a complex intervention targeted at compassionate care
title_fullStr Optimising impact and sustainability: a qualitative process evaluation of a complex intervention targeted at compassionate care
title_full_unstemmed Optimising impact and sustainability: a qualitative process evaluation of a complex intervention targeted at compassionate care
title_short Optimising impact and sustainability: a qualitative process evaluation of a complex intervention targeted at compassionate care
title_sort optimising impact and sustainability: a qualitative process evaluation of a complex intervention targeted at compassionate care
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28916581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006702
work_keys_str_mv AT bridgesjackie optimisingimpactandsustainabilityaqualitativeprocessevaluationofacomplexinterventiontargetedatcompassionatecare
AT maycarl optimisingimpactandsustainabilityaqualitativeprocessevaluationofacomplexinterventiontargetedatcompassionatecare
AT fulleralison optimisingimpactandsustainabilityaqualitativeprocessevaluationofacomplexinterventiontargetedatcompassionatecare
AT griffithspeter optimisingimpactandsustainabilityaqualitativeprocessevaluationofacomplexinterventiontargetedatcompassionatecare
AT wigleywendy optimisingimpactandsustainabilityaqualitativeprocessevaluationofacomplexinterventiontargetedatcompassionatecare
AT gouldlisa optimisingimpactandsustainabilityaqualitativeprocessevaluationofacomplexinterventiontargetedatcompassionatecare
AT barkerhannah optimisingimpactandsustainabilityaqualitativeprocessevaluationofacomplexinterventiontargetedatcompassionatecare
AT libbertonpaula optimisingimpactandsustainabilityaqualitativeprocessevaluationofacomplexinterventiontargetedatcompassionatecare