Cargando…
Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice?
We describe two cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy and analyze all the aetiological factors involved in this circumstance according to the recent literature, focusing above all on the surgical procedures and the characteristics of the excised myomas. The two cases of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1404815 |
_version_ | 1783289735357136896 |
---|---|
author | Vimercati, Antonella Del Vecchio, Vittoria Chincoli, Annarosa Malvasi, Antonio Cicinelli, Ettore |
author_facet | Vimercati, Antonella Del Vecchio, Vittoria Chincoli, Annarosa Malvasi, Antonio Cicinelli, Ettore |
author_sort | Vimercati, Antonella |
collection | PubMed |
description | We describe two cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy and analyze all the aetiological factors involved in this circumstance according to the recent literature, focusing above all on the surgical procedures and the characteristics of the excised myomas. The two cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy following laparoscopic myomectomy occurred at 36 and 18 weeks of gestation, respectively. Both women had undergone laparoscopic multiple myomectomy and uterine rupture occurred along the isthmic myomectomy scars, despite the fact that compliance with all the recent technical surgical recommendations for the previous laparoscopic multiple myomectomy had been fully observed. In our cases we identified the isthmic localization, size of the excised myomas (≥4 cm), and individual characteristics of the healing process as possible risk factors for “a real complication.” Larger studies and robust case-control analyses are needed to draw reliable conclusions; special care should be paid when performing laparoscopic myomectomy in women planning a later pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5750492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57504922018-02-08 Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice? Vimercati, Antonella Del Vecchio, Vittoria Chincoli, Annarosa Malvasi, Antonio Cicinelli, Ettore Case Rep Obstet Gynecol Case Report We describe two cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy and analyze all the aetiological factors involved in this circumstance according to the recent literature, focusing above all on the surgical procedures and the characteristics of the excised myomas. The two cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy following laparoscopic myomectomy occurred at 36 and 18 weeks of gestation, respectively. Both women had undergone laparoscopic multiple myomectomy and uterine rupture occurred along the isthmic myomectomy scars, despite the fact that compliance with all the recent technical surgical recommendations for the previous laparoscopic multiple myomectomy had been fully observed. In our cases we identified the isthmic localization, size of the excised myomas (≥4 cm), and individual characteristics of the healing process as possible risk factors for “a real complication.” Larger studies and robust case-control analyses are needed to draw reliable conclusions; special care should be paid when performing laparoscopic myomectomy in women planning a later pregnancy. Hindawi 2017 2017-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5750492/ /pubmed/29423325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1404815 Text en Copyright © 2017 Antonella Vimercati et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Vimercati, Antonella Del Vecchio, Vittoria Chincoli, Annarosa Malvasi, Antonio Cicinelli, Ettore Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice? |
title | Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice? |
title_full | Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice? |
title_fullStr | Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice? |
title_full_unstemmed | Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice? |
title_short | Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice? |
title_sort | uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy in two cases: real complication or malpractice? |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1404815 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vimercatiantonella uterineruptureafterlaparoscopicmyomectomyintwocasesrealcomplicationormalpractice AT delvecchiovittoria uterineruptureafterlaparoscopicmyomectomyintwocasesrealcomplicationormalpractice AT chincoliannarosa uterineruptureafterlaparoscopicmyomectomyintwocasesrealcomplicationormalpractice AT malvasiantonio uterineruptureafterlaparoscopicmyomectomyintwocasesrealcomplicationormalpractice AT cicinelliettore uterineruptureafterlaparoscopicmyomectomyintwocasesrealcomplicationormalpractice |