Cargando…

Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice?

We describe two cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy and analyze all the aetiological factors involved in this circumstance according to the recent literature, focusing above all on the surgical procedures and the characteristics of the excised myomas. The two cases of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vimercati, Antonella, Del Vecchio, Vittoria, Chincoli, Annarosa, Malvasi, Antonio, Cicinelli, Ettore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1404815
_version_ 1783289735357136896
author Vimercati, Antonella
Del Vecchio, Vittoria
Chincoli, Annarosa
Malvasi, Antonio
Cicinelli, Ettore
author_facet Vimercati, Antonella
Del Vecchio, Vittoria
Chincoli, Annarosa
Malvasi, Antonio
Cicinelli, Ettore
author_sort Vimercati, Antonella
collection PubMed
description We describe two cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy and analyze all the aetiological factors involved in this circumstance according to the recent literature, focusing above all on the surgical procedures and the characteristics of the excised myomas. The two cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy following laparoscopic myomectomy occurred at 36 and 18 weeks of gestation, respectively. Both women had undergone laparoscopic multiple myomectomy and uterine rupture occurred along the isthmic myomectomy scars, despite the fact that compliance with all the recent technical surgical recommendations for the previous laparoscopic multiple myomectomy had been fully observed. In our cases we identified the isthmic localization, size of the excised myomas (≥4 cm), and individual characteristics of the healing process as possible risk factors for “a real complication.” Larger studies and robust case-control analyses are needed to draw reliable conclusions; special care should be paid when performing laparoscopic myomectomy in women planning a later pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5750492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57504922018-02-08 Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice? Vimercati, Antonella Del Vecchio, Vittoria Chincoli, Annarosa Malvasi, Antonio Cicinelli, Ettore Case Rep Obstet Gynecol Case Report We describe two cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy and analyze all the aetiological factors involved in this circumstance according to the recent literature, focusing above all on the surgical procedures and the characteristics of the excised myomas. The two cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy following laparoscopic myomectomy occurred at 36 and 18 weeks of gestation, respectively. Both women had undergone laparoscopic multiple myomectomy and uterine rupture occurred along the isthmic myomectomy scars, despite the fact that compliance with all the recent technical surgical recommendations for the previous laparoscopic multiple myomectomy had been fully observed. In our cases we identified the isthmic localization, size of the excised myomas (≥4 cm), and individual characteristics of the healing process as possible risk factors for “a real complication.” Larger studies and robust case-control analyses are needed to draw reliable conclusions; special care should be paid when performing laparoscopic myomectomy in women planning a later pregnancy. Hindawi 2017 2017-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5750492/ /pubmed/29423325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1404815 Text en Copyright © 2017 Antonella Vimercati et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Vimercati, Antonella
Del Vecchio, Vittoria
Chincoli, Annarosa
Malvasi, Antonio
Cicinelli, Ettore
Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice?
title Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice?
title_full Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice?
title_fullStr Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice?
title_full_unstemmed Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice?
title_short Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Two Cases: Real Complication or Malpractice?
title_sort uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy in two cases: real complication or malpractice?
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1404815
work_keys_str_mv AT vimercatiantonella uterineruptureafterlaparoscopicmyomectomyintwocasesrealcomplicationormalpractice
AT delvecchiovittoria uterineruptureafterlaparoscopicmyomectomyintwocasesrealcomplicationormalpractice
AT chincoliannarosa uterineruptureafterlaparoscopicmyomectomyintwocasesrealcomplicationormalpractice
AT malvasiantonio uterineruptureafterlaparoscopicmyomectomyintwocasesrealcomplicationormalpractice
AT cicinelliettore uterineruptureafterlaparoscopicmyomectomyintwocasesrealcomplicationormalpractice