Cargando…

Familial Screening for Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Evidence? What Is the Cost?

Since the American Heart Association’s recommendation for familial screening of adults with congenital heart disease for bicuspid aortic valve, similar recommendations for other left-sided heart defects, such as hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), have been proposed. However, defining at-risk po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perry, Daniel J., Mullen, Connor R., Carvajal, Horacio G., Brar, Anoop K., Eghtesady, Pirooz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29292713
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases5040029
_version_ 1783289744265838592
author Perry, Daniel J.
Mullen, Connor R.
Carvajal, Horacio G.
Brar, Anoop K.
Eghtesady, Pirooz
author_facet Perry, Daniel J.
Mullen, Connor R.
Carvajal, Horacio G.
Brar, Anoop K.
Eghtesady, Pirooz
author_sort Perry, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description Since the American Heart Association’s recommendation for familial screening of adults with congenital heart disease for bicuspid aortic valve, similar recommendations for other left-sided heart defects, such as hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), have been proposed. However, defining at-risk populations for these heart defects based on genetics is less straightforward due to the wide variability of inheritance patterns and non-genetic influences such as environmental and lifestyle factors. We discuss whether there is sufficient evidence to standardize echocardiographic screening for first-degree relatives of children diagnosed with HLHS. Due to variations in the inclusion of cardiac anomalies linked to HLHS and the identification of asymptomatic individuals with cardiac malformations, published studies are open to interpretation. We conclude that familial aggregation of obstructive left-sided congenital heart lesions in families with history of HLHS is not supported and recommend that additional screening should adopt a more conservative definition of what truly constitutes this heart defect. More thorough consideration is needed before embracing familial screening recommendations of families of patients with HLHS, since this could inflict serious costs on healthcare infrastructure and further burden affected families both emotionally and financially.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5750540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57505402018-01-08 Familial Screening for Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Evidence? What Is the Cost? Perry, Daniel J. Mullen, Connor R. Carvajal, Horacio G. Brar, Anoop K. Eghtesady, Pirooz Diseases Review Since the American Heart Association’s recommendation for familial screening of adults with congenital heart disease for bicuspid aortic valve, similar recommendations for other left-sided heart defects, such as hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), have been proposed. However, defining at-risk populations for these heart defects based on genetics is less straightforward due to the wide variability of inheritance patterns and non-genetic influences such as environmental and lifestyle factors. We discuss whether there is sufficient evidence to standardize echocardiographic screening for first-degree relatives of children diagnosed with HLHS. Due to variations in the inclusion of cardiac anomalies linked to HLHS and the identification of asymptomatic individuals with cardiac malformations, published studies are open to interpretation. We conclude that familial aggregation of obstructive left-sided congenital heart lesions in families with history of HLHS is not supported and recommend that additional screening should adopt a more conservative definition of what truly constitutes this heart defect. More thorough consideration is needed before embracing familial screening recommendations of families of patients with HLHS, since this could inflict serious costs on healthcare infrastructure and further burden affected families both emotionally and financially. MDPI 2017-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5750540/ /pubmed/29292713 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases5040029 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Perry, Daniel J.
Mullen, Connor R.
Carvajal, Horacio G.
Brar, Anoop K.
Eghtesady, Pirooz
Familial Screening for Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Evidence? What Is the Cost?
title Familial Screening for Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Evidence? What Is the Cost?
title_full Familial Screening for Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Evidence? What Is the Cost?
title_fullStr Familial Screening for Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Evidence? What Is the Cost?
title_full_unstemmed Familial Screening for Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Evidence? What Is the Cost?
title_short Familial Screening for Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Evidence? What Is the Cost?
title_sort familial screening for left-sided congenital heart disease: what is the evidence? what is the cost?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29292713
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases5040029
work_keys_str_mv AT perrydanielj familialscreeningforleftsidedcongenitalheartdiseasewhatistheevidencewhatisthecost
AT mullenconnorr familialscreeningforleftsidedcongenitalheartdiseasewhatistheevidencewhatisthecost
AT carvajalhoraciog familialscreeningforleftsidedcongenitalheartdiseasewhatistheevidencewhatisthecost
AT braranoopk familialscreeningforleftsidedcongenitalheartdiseasewhatistheevidencewhatisthecost
AT eghtesadypirooz familialscreeningforleftsidedcongenitalheartdiseasewhatistheevidencewhatisthecost