Cargando…
The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation
Background: Evaluating applications for multi-national, multi-disciplinary, dual-purpose research consortia is highly complex. There has been little research on the peer review process for evaluating grant applications and almost none on how applications for multi-national consortia are reviewed. Ov...
Autores principales: | Gregorius, Stefanie, Dean, Laura, Cole, Donald C, Bates, Imelda |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29333239 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12496.3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Advancing the science of health research capacity strengthening in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the published literature, 2000–2016
por: Dean, Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Strengthening capacity for natural sciences research: A qualitative assessment to identify good practices, capacity gaps and investment priorities in African research institutions
por: El Hajj, Taghreed, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding
por: Roebber, Paul J., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Pension Fund award
por: Antonella Del Rosso
Publicado: (2013) -
How international research consortia can strengthen organisations’ research systems and promote a conducive environment and culture
por: Pulford, Justin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)