Cargando…

Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease‐modifying drugs: A best‐worst scaling

BACKGROUND: The choice between disease‐modifying drugs (DMDs) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) becomes more often a shared decision between the patient and the neurologist and MS nurse. This study aimed to assess which DMD attributes are most important for the healthcare professionals in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kremer, Ingrid E. H., Evers, Silvia M. A. A., Jongen, Peter J., Hiligsmann, Mickaël
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28734004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12599
_version_ 1783289793246920704
author Kremer, Ingrid E. H.
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Jongen, Peter J.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël
author_facet Kremer, Ingrid E. H.
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Jongen, Peter J.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël
author_sort Kremer, Ingrid E. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The choice between disease‐modifying drugs (DMDs) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) becomes more often a shared decision between the patient and the neurologist and MS nurse. This study aimed to assess which DMD attributes are most important for the healthcare professionals in selecting a DMD for a patient. Subsequently, within this perspective, the neurologists’ and nurses’ perspectives were compared. Lastly, the healthcare professionals’ perspective was compared with the patients’ perspective to detect any differences that may need attention in the communication about DMDs. DESIGN: A best‐worst scaling (BWS) was conducted among 27 neurologists and 33 MS nurses treating patients with MS to determine the importance of 27 DMD attributes. These attributes were identified through three focus groups with MS patients in a previous study (N=19). Relative importance scores (RISs) were estimated for each attribute. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to compare the different perspectives. RESULTS: According to the neurologists and nurses, safety of the DMD was the most important DMD attribute in the treatment decision, closely followed by effect on disability progression, quality of life and relapse rate. Patients with MS agreed with the importance of the last three attributes, but valued safety significantly lower (b=−2.59, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, overall, neurologists and nurses regard the same DMD attributes as important as MS patients with the notable exception of safety. This study provides valuable information for the development of interventions to support shared decision making and highlights which attributes of DMDs may need additional attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5750752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57507522018-02-01 Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease‐modifying drugs: A best‐worst scaling Kremer, Ingrid E. H. Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Jongen, Peter J. Hiligsmann, Mickaël Health Expect Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: The choice between disease‐modifying drugs (DMDs) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) becomes more often a shared decision between the patient and the neurologist and MS nurse. This study aimed to assess which DMD attributes are most important for the healthcare professionals in selecting a DMD for a patient. Subsequently, within this perspective, the neurologists’ and nurses’ perspectives were compared. Lastly, the healthcare professionals’ perspective was compared with the patients’ perspective to detect any differences that may need attention in the communication about DMDs. DESIGN: A best‐worst scaling (BWS) was conducted among 27 neurologists and 33 MS nurses treating patients with MS to determine the importance of 27 DMD attributes. These attributes were identified through three focus groups with MS patients in a previous study (N=19). Relative importance scores (RISs) were estimated for each attribute. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to compare the different perspectives. RESULTS: According to the neurologists and nurses, safety of the DMD was the most important DMD attribute in the treatment decision, closely followed by effect on disability progression, quality of life and relapse rate. Patients with MS agreed with the importance of the last three attributes, but valued safety significantly lower (b=−2.59, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, overall, neurologists and nurses regard the same DMD attributes as important as MS patients with the notable exception of safety. This study provides valuable information for the development of interventions to support shared decision making and highlights which attributes of DMDs may need additional attention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-21 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5750752/ /pubmed/28734004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12599 Text en © 2017 The Authors Health Expectations Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Kremer, Ingrid E. H.
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Jongen, Peter J.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël
Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease‐modifying drugs: A best‐worst scaling
title Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease‐modifying drugs: A best‐worst scaling
title_full Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease‐modifying drugs: A best‐worst scaling
title_fullStr Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease‐modifying drugs: A best‐worst scaling
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease‐modifying drugs: A best‐worst scaling
title_short Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease‐modifying drugs: A best‐worst scaling
title_sort comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and ms patients for attributes of disease‐modifying drugs: a best‐worst scaling
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28734004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12599
work_keys_str_mv AT kremeringrideh comparisonofpreferencesofhealthcareprofessionalsandmspatientsforattributesofdiseasemodifyingdrugsabestworstscaling
AT everssilviamaa comparisonofpreferencesofhealthcareprofessionalsandmspatientsforattributesofdiseasemodifyingdrugsabestworstscaling
AT jongenpeterj comparisonofpreferencesofhealthcareprofessionalsandmspatientsforattributesofdiseasemodifyingdrugsabestworstscaling
AT hiligsmannmickael comparisonofpreferencesofhealthcareprofessionalsandmspatientsforattributesofdiseasemodifyingdrugsabestworstscaling