Cargando…

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Skin Diseases Due to Particulate Matter

This study investigated the effects of particulate matter (PM) on human skin diseases by conducting a systematic review of existing literature and performing a meta-analysis. It considered articles reporting an original effect of PM on human skin. From among 918 articles identified, 13 articles were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ngoc, Le Thi Nhu, Park, Duckshin, Lee, Yongil, Lee, Young-Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29186837
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121458
_version_ 1783289820703883264
author Ngoc, Le Thi Nhu
Park, Duckshin
Lee, Yongil
Lee, Young-Chul
author_facet Ngoc, Le Thi Nhu
Park, Duckshin
Lee, Yongil
Lee, Young-Chul
author_sort Ngoc, Le Thi Nhu
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the effects of particulate matter (PM) on human skin diseases by conducting a systematic review of existing literature and performing a meta-analysis. It considered articles reporting an original effect of PM on human skin. From among 918 articles identified, 13 articles were included for further consideration after manual screening of the articles resulted in the exclusion of articles that did not contain data, review articles, editorials, and also articles in languages other than English. Random-effects models and forest plots were used to estimate the effect of PM on the skin by Meta-Disc analysis. According to people’s reports of exposure and negative skin effects (atopic dermatitis (AD), eczema, and skin aging, etc.) due to air pollution, the summary relative risk (odds ratio) of PM(10) was determined to be 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.11) whereas PM(2.5) was determined to be 1.04 (95% CI 0.96–1.12). Simultaneously, there was a different extent of impact between PM(10) and PM(2.5) on atopic dermatitis (AD) for those of young age: the odds ratio of PM(10) and PM(2.5) were 0.96 (95% CI 0.83–1.11; I(2) = 62.7%) and 1.05 (95% CI 0.95–1.16; I(2) = 46%), respectively. Furthermore, the results suggest an estimated increase of disease incidence per 10 μg/m(3) PM of 1.01% (0.08–2.05) due to PM(10) and 1.60% (0.45–2.82) due to PM(2.5). Following the results, PM(10) and PM(2.5) are associated with increased risks of human skin diseases, especially AD, whose risk is higher in infants and school children. With its smaller size and a high concentration of metals, PM(2.5) is more closely related to AD in younger people, compared to PM(10).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5750877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57508772018-01-10 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Skin Diseases Due to Particulate Matter Ngoc, Le Thi Nhu Park, Duckshin Lee, Yongil Lee, Young-Chul Int J Environ Res Public Health Communication This study investigated the effects of particulate matter (PM) on human skin diseases by conducting a systematic review of existing literature and performing a meta-analysis. It considered articles reporting an original effect of PM on human skin. From among 918 articles identified, 13 articles were included for further consideration after manual screening of the articles resulted in the exclusion of articles that did not contain data, review articles, editorials, and also articles in languages other than English. Random-effects models and forest plots were used to estimate the effect of PM on the skin by Meta-Disc analysis. According to people’s reports of exposure and negative skin effects (atopic dermatitis (AD), eczema, and skin aging, etc.) due to air pollution, the summary relative risk (odds ratio) of PM(10) was determined to be 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.11) whereas PM(2.5) was determined to be 1.04 (95% CI 0.96–1.12). Simultaneously, there was a different extent of impact between PM(10) and PM(2.5) on atopic dermatitis (AD) for those of young age: the odds ratio of PM(10) and PM(2.5) were 0.96 (95% CI 0.83–1.11; I(2) = 62.7%) and 1.05 (95% CI 0.95–1.16; I(2) = 46%), respectively. Furthermore, the results suggest an estimated increase of disease incidence per 10 μg/m(3) PM of 1.01% (0.08–2.05) due to PM(10) and 1.60% (0.45–2.82) due to PM(2.5). Following the results, PM(10) and PM(2.5) are associated with increased risks of human skin diseases, especially AD, whose risk is higher in infants and school children. With its smaller size and a high concentration of metals, PM(2.5) is more closely related to AD in younger people, compared to PM(10). MDPI 2017-11-25 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5750877/ /pubmed/29186837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121458 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Ngoc, Le Thi Nhu
Park, Duckshin
Lee, Yongil
Lee, Young-Chul
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Skin Diseases Due to Particulate Matter
title Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Skin Diseases Due to Particulate Matter
title_full Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Skin Diseases Due to Particulate Matter
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Skin Diseases Due to Particulate Matter
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Skin Diseases Due to Particulate Matter
title_short Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Skin Diseases Due to Particulate Matter
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of human skin diseases due to particulate matter
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5750877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29186837
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121458
work_keys_str_mv AT ngoclethinhu systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanskindiseasesduetoparticulatematter
AT parkduckshin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanskindiseasesduetoparticulatematter
AT leeyongil systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanskindiseasesduetoparticulatematter
AT leeyoungchul systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofhumanskindiseasesduetoparticulatematter