Cargando…

Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice

With imprecise definitions, inexact measurement tools, and flawed study execution, our clinical science often lags behind bedside experience and simply documents what appear to be the apparent faults or validity of ongoing practices. These impressions are later confirmed, modified, or overturned by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marini, John J., De Backer, Daniel, Ince, Can, Singer, Mervyn, Van Haren, Frank, Westphal, Martin, Wischmeyer, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29297400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1904-x
_version_ 1783289942025175040
author Marini, John J.
De Backer, Daniel
Ince, Can
Singer, Mervyn
Van Haren, Frank
Westphal, Martin
Wischmeyer, Paul
author_facet Marini, John J.
De Backer, Daniel
Ince, Can
Singer, Mervyn
Van Haren, Frank
Westphal, Martin
Wischmeyer, Paul
author_sort Marini, John J.
collection PubMed
description With imprecise definitions, inexact measurement tools, and flawed study execution, our clinical science often lags behind bedside experience and simply documents what appear to be the apparent faults or validity of ongoing practices. These impressions are later confirmed, modified, or overturned by the results of the next trial. On the other hand, insights that stem from the intuitions of experienced clinicians, scientists and educators—while often neglected—help place current thinking into proper perspective and occasionally point the way toward formulating novel hypotheses that direct future research. Both streams of information and opinion contribute to progress. In this paper we present a wide-ranging set of unproven ‘out of the mainstream’ ideas of our FCCM faculty, each with a defensible rationale and holding clear implications for altering bedside management. Each proposition was designed deliberately to be provocative so as to raise awareness, stimulate new thinking and initiate lively dialog.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5751395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57513952018-01-05 Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice Marini, John J. De Backer, Daniel Ince, Can Singer, Mervyn Van Haren, Frank Westphal, Martin Wischmeyer, Paul Crit Care Review With imprecise definitions, inexact measurement tools, and flawed study execution, our clinical science often lags behind bedside experience and simply documents what appear to be the apparent faults or validity of ongoing practices. These impressions are later confirmed, modified, or overturned by the results of the next trial. On the other hand, insights that stem from the intuitions of experienced clinicians, scientists and educators—while often neglected—help place current thinking into proper perspective and occasionally point the way toward formulating novel hypotheses that direct future research. Both streams of information and opinion contribute to progress. In this paper we present a wide-ranging set of unproven ‘out of the mainstream’ ideas of our FCCM faculty, each with a defensible rationale and holding clear implications for altering bedside management. Each proposition was designed deliberately to be provocative so as to raise awareness, stimulate new thinking and initiate lively dialog. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5751395/ /pubmed/29297400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1904-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Marini, John J.
De Backer, Daniel
Ince, Can
Singer, Mervyn
Van Haren, Frank
Westphal, Martin
Wischmeyer, Paul
Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice
title Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice
title_full Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice
title_fullStr Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice
title_full_unstemmed Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice
title_short Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice
title_sort seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future icu practice
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29297400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1904-x
work_keys_str_mv AT marinijohnj sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice
AT debackerdaniel sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice
AT incecan sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice
AT singermervyn sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice
AT vanharenfrank sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice
AT westphalmartin sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice
AT wischmeyerpaul sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice