Cargando…
Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice
With imprecise definitions, inexact measurement tools, and flawed study execution, our clinical science often lags behind bedside experience and simply documents what appear to be the apparent faults or validity of ongoing practices. These impressions are later confirmed, modified, or overturned by...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29297400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1904-x |
_version_ | 1783289942025175040 |
---|---|
author | Marini, John J. De Backer, Daniel Ince, Can Singer, Mervyn Van Haren, Frank Westphal, Martin Wischmeyer, Paul |
author_facet | Marini, John J. De Backer, Daniel Ince, Can Singer, Mervyn Van Haren, Frank Westphal, Martin Wischmeyer, Paul |
author_sort | Marini, John J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | With imprecise definitions, inexact measurement tools, and flawed study execution, our clinical science often lags behind bedside experience and simply documents what appear to be the apparent faults or validity of ongoing practices. These impressions are later confirmed, modified, or overturned by the results of the next trial. On the other hand, insights that stem from the intuitions of experienced clinicians, scientists and educators—while often neglected—help place current thinking into proper perspective and occasionally point the way toward formulating novel hypotheses that direct future research. Both streams of information and opinion contribute to progress. In this paper we present a wide-ranging set of unproven ‘out of the mainstream’ ideas of our FCCM faculty, each with a defensible rationale and holding clear implications for altering bedside management. Each proposition was designed deliberately to be provocative so as to raise awareness, stimulate new thinking and initiate lively dialog. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5751395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57513952018-01-05 Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice Marini, John J. De Backer, Daniel Ince, Can Singer, Mervyn Van Haren, Frank Westphal, Martin Wischmeyer, Paul Crit Care Review With imprecise definitions, inexact measurement tools, and flawed study execution, our clinical science often lags behind bedside experience and simply documents what appear to be the apparent faults or validity of ongoing practices. These impressions are later confirmed, modified, or overturned by the results of the next trial. On the other hand, insights that stem from the intuitions of experienced clinicians, scientists and educators—while often neglected—help place current thinking into proper perspective and occasionally point the way toward formulating novel hypotheses that direct future research. Both streams of information and opinion contribute to progress. In this paper we present a wide-ranging set of unproven ‘out of the mainstream’ ideas of our FCCM faculty, each with a defensible rationale and holding clear implications for altering bedside management. Each proposition was designed deliberately to be provocative so as to raise awareness, stimulate new thinking and initiate lively dialog. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5751395/ /pubmed/29297400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1904-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Marini, John J. De Backer, Daniel Ince, Can Singer, Mervyn Van Haren, Frank Westphal, Martin Wischmeyer, Paul Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice |
title | Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice |
title_full | Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice |
title_fullStr | Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice |
title_short | Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice |
title_sort | seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future icu practice |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29297400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1904-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinijohnj sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice AT debackerdaniel sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice AT incecan sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice AT singermervyn sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice AT vanharenfrank sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice AT westphalmartin sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice AT wischmeyerpaul sevenunconfirmedideastoimprovefutureicupractice |