Cargando…

Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor

Inexpensive aerosol sensors have been considered as a complementary option to address the issue of expensive but low spatial coverage air quality monitoring networks. However, the accuracy and response characteristics of these sensors is poorly documented. In this study, inexpensive Shinyei PPD42NS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuula, Joel, Mäkelä, Timo, Hillamo, Risto, Timonen, Hilkka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29244715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17122915
_version_ 1783289974022471680
author Kuula, Joel
Mäkelä, Timo
Hillamo, Risto
Timonen, Hilkka
author_facet Kuula, Joel
Mäkelä, Timo
Hillamo, Risto
Timonen, Hilkka
author_sort Kuula, Joel
collection PubMed
description Inexpensive aerosol sensors have been considered as a complementary option to address the issue of expensive but low spatial coverage air quality monitoring networks. However, the accuracy and response characteristics of these sensors is poorly documented. In this study, inexpensive Shinyei PPD42NS and PPD60PV sensors were evaluated using a novel laboratory evaluation method. A continuously changing monodisperse size distribution of particles was generated using a Vibrating Orifice Aerosol Generator. Furthermore, the laboratory results were validated in a field experiment. The laboratory tests showed that both of the sensors responded to particulate mass (PM) concentration stimulus, rather than number concentration. The highest detection efficiency for the PPD42NS was within particle size range of 2.5–4 µm, and the respective optimal size range for the PPD60PV was 0.7–1 µm. The field test yielded high PM correlations (R(2) = 0.962 and R(2) = 0.986) for viable detection ranges of 1.6–5 and 0.3–1.6 µm, when compared to a medium cost optical dust monitor. As the size distribution of atmospheric particles tends to be bimodal, it is likely that indicatively valid results could be obtained for the PM(10–2.5) size fraction (particulate mass in size range 2.5–10 µm) with the PPD42NS sensor. Respectively, the PPD60PV could possibly be used to measure the PM(2.5) size fraction (particulate mass in size below 2.5 µm).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5751569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57515692018-01-10 Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor Kuula, Joel Mäkelä, Timo Hillamo, Risto Timonen, Hilkka Sensors (Basel) Article Inexpensive aerosol sensors have been considered as a complementary option to address the issue of expensive but low spatial coverage air quality monitoring networks. However, the accuracy and response characteristics of these sensors is poorly documented. In this study, inexpensive Shinyei PPD42NS and PPD60PV sensors were evaluated using a novel laboratory evaluation method. A continuously changing monodisperse size distribution of particles was generated using a Vibrating Orifice Aerosol Generator. Furthermore, the laboratory results were validated in a field experiment. The laboratory tests showed that both of the sensors responded to particulate mass (PM) concentration stimulus, rather than number concentration. The highest detection efficiency for the PPD42NS was within particle size range of 2.5–4 µm, and the respective optimal size range for the PPD60PV was 0.7–1 µm. The field test yielded high PM correlations (R(2) = 0.962 and R(2) = 0.986) for viable detection ranges of 1.6–5 and 0.3–1.6 µm, when compared to a medium cost optical dust monitor. As the size distribution of atmospheric particles tends to be bimodal, it is likely that indicatively valid results could be obtained for the PM(10–2.5) size fraction (particulate mass in size range 2.5–10 µm) with the PPD42NS sensor. Respectively, the PPD60PV could possibly be used to measure the PM(2.5) size fraction (particulate mass in size below 2.5 µm). MDPI 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5751569/ /pubmed/29244715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17122915 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kuula, Joel
Mäkelä, Timo
Hillamo, Risto
Timonen, Hilkka
Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor
title Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor
title_full Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor
title_fullStr Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor
title_full_unstemmed Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor
title_short Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor
title_sort response characterization of an inexpensive aerosol sensor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29244715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17122915
work_keys_str_mv AT kuulajoel responsecharacterizationofaninexpensiveaerosolsensor
AT makelatimo responsecharacterizationofaninexpensiveaerosolsensor
AT hillamoristo responsecharacterizationofaninexpensiveaerosolsensor
AT timonenhilkka responsecharacterizationofaninexpensiveaerosolsensor