Cargando…
Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor
Inexpensive aerosol sensors have been considered as a complementary option to address the issue of expensive but low spatial coverage air quality monitoring networks. However, the accuracy and response characteristics of these sensors is poorly documented. In this study, inexpensive Shinyei PPD42NS...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29244715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17122915 |
_version_ | 1783289974022471680 |
---|---|
author | Kuula, Joel Mäkelä, Timo Hillamo, Risto Timonen, Hilkka |
author_facet | Kuula, Joel Mäkelä, Timo Hillamo, Risto Timonen, Hilkka |
author_sort | Kuula, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inexpensive aerosol sensors have been considered as a complementary option to address the issue of expensive but low spatial coverage air quality monitoring networks. However, the accuracy and response characteristics of these sensors is poorly documented. In this study, inexpensive Shinyei PPD42NS and PPD60PV sensors were evaluated using a novel laboratory evaluation method. A continuously changing monodisperse size distribution of particles was generated using a Vibrating Orifice Aerosol Generator. Furthermore, the laboratory results were validated in a field experiment. The laboratory tests showed that both of the sensors responded to particulate mass (PM) concentration stimulus, rather than number concentration. The highest detection efficiency for the PPD42NS was within particle size range of 2.5–4 µm, and the respective optimal size range for the PPD60PV was 0.7–1 µm. The field test yielded high PM correlations (R(2) = 0.962 and R(2) = 0.986) for viable detection ranges of 1.6–5 and 0.3–1.6 µm, when compared to a medium cost optical dust monitor. As the size distribution of atmospheric particles tends to be bimodal, it is likely that indicatively valid results could be obtained for the PM(10–2.5) size fraction (particulate mass in size range 2.5–10 µm) with the PPD42NS sensor. Respectively, the PPD60PV could possibly be used to measure the PM(2.5) size fraction (particulate mass in size below 2.5 µm). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5751569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57515692018-01-10 Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor Kuula, Joel Mäkelä, Timo Hillamo, Risto Timonen, Hilkka Sensors (Basel) Article Inexpensive aerosol sensors have been considered as a complementary option to address the issue of expensive but low spatial coverage air quality monitoring networks. However, the accuracy and response characteristics of these sensors is poorly documented. In this study, inexpensive Shinyei PPD42NS and PPD60PV sensors were evaluated using a novel laboratory evaluation method. A continuously changing monodisperse size distribution of particles was generated using a Vibrating Orifice Aerosol Generator. Furthermore, the laboratory results were validated in a field experiment. The laboratory tests showed that both of the sensors responded to particulate mass (PM) concentration stimulus, rather than number concentration. The highest detection efficiency for the PPD42NS was within particle size range of 2.5–4 µm, and the respective optimal size range for the PPD60PV was 0.7–1 µm. The field test yielded high PM correlations (R(2) = 0.962 and R(2) = 0.986) for viable detection ranges of 1.6–5 and 0.3–1.6 µm, when compared to a medium cost optical dust monitor. As the size distribution of atmospheric particles tends to be bimodal, it is likely that indicatively valid results could be obtained for the PM(10–2.5) size fraction (particulate mass in size range 2.5–10 µm) with the PPD42NS sensor. Respectively, the PPD60PV could possibly be used to measure the PM(2.5) size fraction (particulate mass in size below 2.5 µm). MDPI 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5751569/ /pubmed/29244715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17122915 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kuula, Joel Mäkelä, Timo Hillamo, Risto Timonen, Hilkka Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor |
title | Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor |
title_full | Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor |
title_fullStr | Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor |
title_full_unstemmed | Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor |
title_short | Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor |
title_sort | response characterization of an inexpensive aerosol sensor |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29244715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17122915 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuulajoel responsecharacterizationofaninexpensiveaerosolsensor AT makelatimo responsecharacterizationofaninexpensiveaerosolsensor AT hillamoristo responsecharacterizationofaninexpensiveaerosolsensor AT timonenhilkka responsecharacterizationofaninexpensiveaerosolsensor |