Cargando…

Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda

BACKGROUND: The Theory of Change (ToC) is a management and evaluation tool supporting critical thinking in the design, implementation and evaluation of development programmes. We document the experience of Future Health Systems (FHS) Consortium research teams in Bangladesh, India and Uganda with usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paina, Ligia, Wilkinson, Annie, Tetui, Moses, Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth, Barman, Debjani, Ahmed, Tanvir, Mahmood, Shehrin Shaila, Bloom, Gerry, Knezovich, Jeff, George, Asha, Bennett, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29297374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y
_version_ 1783289998277083136
author Paina, Ligia
Wilkinson, Annie
Tetui, Moses
Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth
Barman, Debjani
Ahmed, Tanvir
Mahmood, Shehrin Shaila
Bloom, Gerry
Knezovich, Jeff
George, Asha
Bennett, Sara
author_facet Paina, Ligia
Wilkinson, Annie
Tetui, Moses
Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth
Barman, Debjani
Ahmed, Tanvir
Mahmood, Shehrin Shaila
Bloom, Gerry
Knezovich, Jeff
George, Asha
Bennett, Sara
author_sort Paina, Ligia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Theory of Change (ToC) is a management and evaluation tool supporting critical thinking in the design, implementation and evaluation of development programmes. We document the experience of Future Health Systems (FHS) Consortium research teams in Bangladesh, India and Uganda with using ToC. We seek to understand how and why ToCs were applied and to clarify how they facilitate the implementation of iterative intervention designs and stakeholder engagement in health systems research and strengthening. METHODS: This paper combines literature on ToC, with a summary of reflections by FHS research members on the motivation, development, revision and use of the ToC, as well as on the benefits and challenges of the process. We describe three FHS teams’ experiences along four potential uses of ToCs, namely planning, communication, learning and accountability. RESULTS: The three teams developed ToCs for planning and evaluation purposes as required for their initial plans for FHS in 2011 and revised them half-way through the project, based on assumptions informed by and adjusted through the teams’ experiences during the previous 2 years of implementation. All teams found that the revised ToCs and their accompanying narratives recognised greater feedback among intervention components and among key stakeholders. The ToC development and revision fostered channels for both internal and external communication, among research team members and with key stakeholders, respectively. The process of revising the ToCs challenged the teams’ initial assumptions based on new evidence and experience. In contrast, the ToCs were only minimally used for accountability purposes. CONCLUSIONS: The ToC development and revision process helped FHS research teams, and occasionally key local stakeholders, to reflect on and make their assumptions and mental models about their respective interventions explicit. Other projects using the ToC should allow time for revising and reflecting upon the ToCs, to recognise and document the adaptive nature of health systems, and to foster the time, space and flexibility that health systems strengthening programmes must have to learn from implementation and stakeholder engagement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5751673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57516732018-01-05 Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda Paina, Ligia Wilkinson, Annie Tetui, Moses Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth Barman, Debjani Ahmed, Tanvir Mahmood, Shehrin Shaila Bloom, Gerry Knezovich, Jeff George, Asha Bennett, Sara Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: The Theory of Change (ToC) is a management and evaluation tool supporting critical thinking in the design, implementation and evaluation of development programmes. We document the experience of Future Health Systems (FHS) Consortium research teams in Bangladesh, India and Uganda with using ToC. We seek to understand how and why ToCs were applied and to clarify how they facilitate the implementation of iterative intervention designs and stakeholder engagement in health systems research and strengthening. METHODS: This paper combines literature on ToC, with a summary of reflections by FHS research members on the motivation, development, revision and use of the ToC, as well as on the benefits and challenges of the process. We describe three FHS teams’ experiences along four potential uses of ToCs, namely planning, communication, learning and accountability. RESULTS: The three teams developed ToCs for planning and evaluation purposes as required for their initial plans for FHS in 2011 and revised them half-way through the project, based on assumptions informed by and adjusted through the teams’ experiences during the previous 2 years of implementation. All teams found that the revised ToCs and their accompanying narratives recognised greater feedback among intervention components and among key stakeholders. The ToC development and revision fostered channels for both internal and external communication, among research team members and with key stakeholders, respectively. The process of revising the ToCs challenged the teams’ initial assumptions based on new evidence and experience. In contrast, the ToCs were only minimally used for accountability purposes. CONCLUSIONS: The ToC development and revision process helped FHS research teams, and occasionally key local stakeholders, to reflect on and make their assumptions and mental models about their respective interventions explicit. Other projects using the ToC should allow time for revising and reflecting upon the ToCs, to recognise and document the adaptive nature of health systems, and to foster the time, space and flexibility that health systems strengthening programmes must have to learn from implementation and stakeholder engagement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5751673/ /pubmed/29297374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Paina, Ligia
Wilkinson, Annie
Tetui, Moses
Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth
Barman, Debjani
Ahmed, Tanvir
Mahmood, Shehrin Shaila
Bloom, Gerry
Knezovich, Jeff
George, Asha
Bennett, Sara
Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda
title Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda
title_full Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda
title_fullStr Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda
title_short Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda
title_sort using theories of change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of future health systems consortium partners in bangladesh, india and uganda
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29297374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y
work_keys_str_mv AT painaligia usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda
AT wilkinsonannie usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda
AT tetuimoses usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda
AT ekirapakirachoelizabeth usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda
AT barmandebjani usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda
AT ahmedtanvir usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda
AT mahmoodshehrinshaila usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda
AT bloomgerry usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda
AT knezovichjeff usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda
AT georgeasha usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda
AT bennettsara usingtheoriesofchangetoinformimplementationofhealthsystemsresearchandinnovationexperiencesoffuturehealthsystemsconsortiumpartnersinbangladeshindiaanduganda