Cargando…

Sex differences in primary muscle afferent sensitization following ischemia and reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain conditions are more prevalent in women, but most preclinical studies into mechanisms of pain generation are performed using male animals. Furthermore, whereas group III and IV nociceptive muscle afferents provoke central sensitization more effectively than their cutaneous co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ross, Jessica L., Queme, Luis F., Lamb, Jordan E., Green, Kathryn J., Jankowski, Michael P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29298725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-017-0163-5
_version_ 1783290024362508288
author Ross, Jessica L.
Queme, Luis F.
Lamb, Jordan E.
Green, Kathryn J.
Jankowski, Michael P.
author_facet Ross, Jessica L.
Queme, Luis F.
Lamb, Jordan E.
Green, Kathryn J.
Jankowski, Michael P.
author_sort Ross, Jessica L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic pain conditions are more prevalent in women, but most preclinical studies into mechanisms of pain generation are performed using male animals. Furthermore, whereas group III and IV nociceptive muscle afferents provoke central sensitization more effectively than their cutaneous counterparts, less is known about this critical population of muscle nociceptors. Here, we compare the physiology of individual muscle afferents in uninjured males and females. We then characterize the molecular, physiological, and behavioral effects of transient ischemia and reperfusion injury (I/R), a model we have extensively studied in males and in females. METHODS: Response properties and phenotypes to mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimulation were compared using an ex vivo muscle/nerve/dorsal root ganglia (DRG)/spinal cord recording preparation. Analyses of injury-related changes were also performed by assaying evoked and spontaneous pain-related behaviors, as well as mRNA expression of the affected muscle and DRGs. The appropriate analyses of variance and post hoc tests (with false discovery rate corrections when needed) were performed for each measure. RESULTS: Females have more mechanically sensitive muscle afferents and show greater mechanical and thermal responsiveness than what is found in males. With I/R, both sexes show fewer cells responsive to an innocuous metabolite solution (ATP, lactic acid, and protons), and lower mechanical thresholds in individual afferents; however, females also possess altered thermal responsiveness, which may be related to sex-dependent changes in gene expression within the affected DRGs. Regardless, both sexes show similar increases in I/R-induced pain-like behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we illustrate a unique phenomenon wherein discrete, sex-dependent mechanisms of primary muscle afferent sensitization after ischemic injury to the periphery may underlie similar behavioral changes between the sexes. Furthermore, although the group III and IV muscle afferents are fully developed functionally, the differential mechanisms of sensitization manifest prior to sexual maturity. Hence, this study illustrates the pressing need for further exploration of sex differences in afferent function throughout the lifespan for use in developing appropriately targeted pain therapies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13293-017-0163-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5751812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57518122018-01-05 Sex differences in primary muscle afferent sensitization following ischemia and reperfusion injury Ross, Jessica L. Queme, Luis F. Lamb, Jordan E. Green, Kathryn J. Jankowski, Michael P. Biol Sex Differ Research BACKGROUND: Chronic pain conditions are more prevalent in women, but most preclinical studies into mechanisms of pain generation are performed using male animals. Furthermore, whereas group III and IV nociceptive muscle afferents provoke central sensitization more effectively than their cutaneous counterparts, less is known about this critical population of muscle nociceptors. Here, we compare the physiology of individual muscle afferents in uninjured males and females. We then characterize the molecular, physiological, and behavioral effects of transient ischemia and reperfusion injury (I/R), a model we have extensively studied in males and in females. METHODS: Response properties and phenotypes to mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimulation were compared using an ex vivo muscle/nerve/dorsal root ganglia (DRG)/spinal cord recording preparation. Analyses of injury-related changes were also performed by assaying evoked and spontaneous pain-related behaviors, as well as mRNA expression of the affected muscle and DRGs. The appropriate analyses of variance and post hoc tests (with false discovery rate corrections when needed) were performed for each measure. RESULTS: Females have more mechanically sensitive muscle afferents and show greater mechanical and thermal responsiveness than what is found in males. With I/R, both sexes show fewer cells responsive to an innocuous metabolite solution (ATP, lactic acid, and protons), and lower mechanical thresholds in individual afferents; however, females also possess altered thermal responsiveness, which may be related to sex-dependent changes in gene expression within the affected DRGs. Regardless, both sexes show similar increases in I/R-induced pain-like behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we illustrate a unique phenomenon wherein discrete, sex-dependent mechanisms of primary muscle afferent sensitization after ischemic injury to the periphery may underlie similar behavioral changes between the sexes. Furthermore, although the group III and IV muscle afferents are fully developed functionally, the differential mechanisms of sensitization manifest prior to sexual maturity. Hence, this study illustrates the pressing need for further exploration of sex differences in afferent function throughout the lifespan for use in developing appropriately targeted pain therapies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13293-017-0163-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5751812/ /pubmed/29298725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-017-0163-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ross, Jessica L.
Queme, Luis F.
Lamb, Jordan E.
Green, Kathryn J.
Jankowski, Michael P.
Sex differences in primary muscle afferent sensitization following ischemia and reperfusion injury
title Sex differences in primary muscle afferent sensitization following ischemia and reperfusion injury
title_full Sex differences in primary muscle afferent sensitization following ischemia and reperfusion injury
title_fullStr Sex differences in primary muscle afferent sensitization following ischemia and reperfusion injury
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in primary muscle afferent sensitization following ischemia and reperfusion injury
title_short Sex differences in primary muscle afferent sensitization following ischemia and reperfusion injury
title_sort sex differences in primary muscle afferent sensitization following ischemia and reperfusion injury
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29298725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-017-0163-5
work_keys_str_mv AT rossjessical sexdifferencesinprimarymuscleafferentsensitizationfollowingischemiaandreperfusioninjury
AT quemeluisf sexdifferencesinprimarymuscleafferentsensitizationfollowingischemiaandreperfusioninjury
AT lambjordane sexdifferencesinprimarymuscleafferentsensitizationfollowingischemiaandreperfusioninjury
AT greenkathrynj sexdifferencesinprimarymuscleafferentsensitizationfollowingischemiaandreperfusioninjury
AT jankowskimichaelp sexdifferencesinprimarymuscleafferentsensitizationfollowingischemiaandreperfusioninjury