Cargando…

Physical inactivity in relation to self-rated eyesight: cross-sectional analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

BACKGROUND: To assess the cross-sectional association between self-rated eyesight and physical activity behaviour in a large general population sample of older English adults. METHODS: Analyses of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Participants provided information on self-rated eye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Lee, Timmis, Matthew A, Pardhan, Shahina, Latham, Keziah, Johnstone, James, Hamer, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open Ophthalmology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2016-000046
_version_ 1783290035669303296
author Smith, Lee
Timmis, Matthew A
Pardhan, Shahina
Latham, Keziah
Johnstone, James
Hamer, Mark
author_facet Smith, Lee
Timmis, Matthew A
Pardhan, Shahina
Latham, Keziah
Johnstone, James
Hamer, Mark
author_sort Smith, Lee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the cross-sectional association between self-rated eyesight and physical activity behaviour in a large general population sample of older English adults. METHODS: Analyses of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Participants provided information on self-rated eyesight (categorised as: excellent/very good/good/fair–poor) and their own physical activity levels (categorised as: inactive/moderate only at least 1/week, vigorous at least 1/week). Associations between self-rated eyesight and physical activity levels were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 6634 participants (mean age 65.0±9.2 years) were included in the analyses. In adjusted logistic regression models, those with fair–poor and good eyesight were significantly more likely to be inactive than those who reported excellent eyesight (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.72; OR 1.59, 1.27 to 1.99, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this sample of older English adults, those with self-rated fair–poor vision were over twice as likely to be physically inactive than those who reported having excellent vision. When consistent data have emerged, interventions to increase physical activity in those who have poor eyesight are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5751860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57518602018-01-19 Physical inactivity in relation to self-rated eyesight: cross-sectional analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing Smith, Lee Timmis, Matthew A Pardhan, Shahina Latham, Keziah Johnstone, James Hamer, Mark BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article BACKGROUND: To assess the cross-sectional association between self-rated eyesight and physical activity behaviour in a large general population sample of older English adults. METHODS: Analyses of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Participants provided information on self-rated eyesight (categorised as: excellent/very good/good/fair–poor) and their own physical activity levels (categorised as: inactive/moderate only at least 1/week, vigorous at least 1/week). Associations between self-rated eyesight and physical activity levels were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 6634 participants (mean age 65.0±9.2 years) were included in the analyses. In adjusted logistic regression models, those with fair–poor and good eyesight were significantly more likely to be inactive than those who reported excellent eyesight (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.72; OR 1.59, 1.27 to 1.99, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this sample of older English adults, those with self-rated fair–poor vision were over twice as likely to be physically inactive than those who reported having excellent vision. When consistent data have emerged, interventions to increase physical activity in those who have poor eyesight are needed. BMJ Open Ophthalmology 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5751860/ /pubmed/29354702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2016-000046 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Smith, Lee
Timmis, Matthew A
Pardhan, Shahina
Latham, Keziah
Johnstone, James
Hamer, Mark
Physical inactivity in relation to self-rated eyesight: cross-sectional analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
title Physical inactivity in relation to self-rated eyesight: cross-sectional analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
title_full Physical inactivity in relation to self-rated eyesight: cross-sectional analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
title_fullStr Physical inactivity in relation to self-rated eyesight: cross-sectional analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
title_full_unstemmed Physical inactivity in relation to self-rated eyesight: cross-sectional analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
title_short Physical inactivity in relation to self-rated eyesight: cross-sectional analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
title_sort physical inactivity in relation to self-rated eyesight: cross-sectional analysis from the english longitudinal study of ageing
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2016-000046
work_keys_str_mv AT smithlee physicalinactivityinrelationtoselfratedeyesightcrosssectionalanalysisfromtheenglishlongitudinalstudyofageing
AT timmismatthewa physicalinactivityinrelationtoselfratedeyesightcrosssectionalanalysisfromtheenglishlongitudinalstudyofageing
AT pardhanshahina physicalinactivityinrelationtoselfratedeyesightcrosssectionalanalysisfromtheenglishlongitudinalstudyofageing
AT lathamkeziah physicalinactivityinrelationtoselfratedeyesightcrosssectionalanalysisfromtheenglishlongitudinalstudyofageing
AT johnstonejames physicalinactivityinrelationtoselfratedeyesightcrosssectionalanalysisfromtheenglishlongitudinalstudyofageing
AT hamermark physicalinactivityinrelationtoselfratedeyesightcrosssectionalanalysisfromtheenglishlongitudinalstudyofageing