Cargando…
Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial
OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of weekly transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) over a 6-month period as a treatment for retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective open-label observational trial was carried out assessing weekly TES in participants with RP for a period of 6 m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000096 |
_version_ | 1783290036588904448 |
---|---|
author | Wagner, Siegfried K Jolly, Jasleen K Pefkianaki, Maria Gekeler, Florian Webster, Andrew R Downes, Susan M Maclaren, Robert E |
author_facet | Wagner, Siegfried K Jolly, Jasleen K Pefkianaki, Maria Gekeler, Florian Webster, Andrew R Downes, Susan M Maclaren, Robert E |
author_sort | Wagner, Siegfried K |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of weekly transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) over a 6-month period as a treatment for retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective open-label observational trial was carried out assessing weekly TES in participants with RP for a period of 6 months followed by observation for a further 6 months. Clinical examination and investigations were carried out at 3 monthly intervals for a total of 12 months. The primary outcome measure explored safety through a descriptive analysis of adverse effects with secondary outcome measures evaluating structural and functional efficacy. RESULTS: Seven male and seven female participants with RP aged 18–80 years were recruited. TES was well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. Two participants reported transient foreign body sensation and one participant had discomfort underneath the skin electrode. Following 6 months of TES, best-corrected visual acuity increased by 1.1±1.4 letters in the control arm and 0.93±1.4 letters in the treated arm. Central microperimetry threshold sensitivity rose by 0.02±0.5 decibels (dB) and 0.37±0.4 dB and Goldmann visual field volume by 0.16±0.09 steradians (sr) vs 0.22±0.12 sr for the control and treated eye, respectively. There was no statistical significance seen between eyes following the treatment or observation period. CONCLUSION: This small open-label clinical trial showed that TES was safe and well tolerated in patients with RP. Visual function measurements at 6 months demonstrated no significant difference between the control and treated eyes. The results justify a larger clinical trial over a longer period of time in order to identify any treatment effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5751865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57518652018-01-19 Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial Wagner, Siegfried K Jolly, Jasleen K Pefkianaki, Maria Gekeler, Florian Webster, Andrew R Downes, Susan M Maclaren, Robert E BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of weekly transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) over a 6-month period as a treatment for retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective open-label observational trial was carried out assessing weekly TES in participants with RP for a period of 6 months followed by observation for a further 6 months. Clinical examination and investigations were carried out at 3 monthly intervals for a total of 12 months. The primary outcome measure explored safety through a descriptive analysis of adverse effects with secondary outcome measures evaluating structural and functional efficacy. RESULTS: Seven male and seven female participants with RP aged 18–80 years were recruited. TES was well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. Two participants reported transient foreign body sensation and one participant had discomfort underneath the skin electrode. Following 6 months of TES, best-corrected visual acuity increased by 1.1±1.4 letters in the control arm and 0.93±1.4 letters in the treated arm. Central microperimetry threshold sensitivity rose by 0.02±0.5 decibels (dB) and 0.37±0.4 dB and Goldmann visual field volume by 0.16±0.09 steradians (sr) vs 0.22±0.12 sr for the control and treated eye, respectively. There was no statistical significance seen between eyes following the treatment or observation period. CONCLUSION: This small open-label clinical trial showed that TES was safe and well tolerated in patients with RP. Visual function measurements at 6 months demonstrated no significant difference between the control and treated eyes. The results justify a larger clinical trial over a longer period of time in order to identify any treatment effect. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5751865/ /pubmed/29354722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000096 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wagner, Siegfried K Jolly, Jasleen K Pefkianaki, Maria Gekeler, Florian Webster, Andrew R Downes, Susan M Maclaren, Robert E Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial |
title | Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial |
title_full | Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial |
title_fullStr | Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial |
title_short | Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial |
title_sort | transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the tesolauk trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagnersiegfriedk transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial AT jollyjasleenk transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial AT pefkianakimaria transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial AT gekelerflorian transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial AT websterandrewr transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial AT downessusanm transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial AT maclarenroberte transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial |