Cargando…

Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of weekly transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) over a 6-month period as a treatment for retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective open-label observational trial was carried out assessing weekly TES in participants with RP for a period of 6 m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Siegfried K, Jolly, Jasleen K, Pefkianaki, Maria, Gekeler, Florian, Webster, Andrew R, Downes, Susan M, Maclaren, Robert E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000096
_version_ 1783290036588904448
author Wagner, Siegfried K
Jolly, Jasleen K
Pefkianaki, Maria
Gekeler, Florian
Webster, Andrew R
Downes, Susan M
Maclaren, Robert E
author_facet Wagner, Siegfried K
Jolly, Jasleen K
Pefkianaki, Maria
Gekeler, Florian
Webster, Andrew R
Downes, Susan M
Maclaren, Robert E
author_sort Wagner, Siegfried K
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of weekly transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) over a 6-month period as a treatment for retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective open-label observational trial was carried out assessing weekly TES in participants with RP for a period of 6 months followed by observation for a further 6 months. Clinical examination and investigations were carried out at 3 monthly intervals for a total of 12 months. The primary outcome measure explored safety through a descriptive analysis of adverse effects with secondary outcome measures evaluating structural and functional efficacy. RESULTS: Seven male and seven female participants with RP aged 18–80 years were recruited. TES was well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. Two participants reported transient foreign body sensation and one participant had discomfort underneath the skin electrode. Following 6 months of TES, best-corrected visual acuity increased by 1.1±1.4 letters in the control arm and 0.93±1.4 letters in the treated arm. Central microperimetry threshold sensitivity rose by 0.02±0.5 decibels (dB) and 0.37±0.4 dB and Goldmann visual field volume by 0.16±0.09 steradians (sr) vs 0.22±0.12 sr for the control and treated eye, respectively. There was no statistical significance seen between eyes following the treatment or observation period. CONCLUSION: This small open-label clinical trial showed that TES was safe and well tolerated in patients with RP. Visual function measurements at 6 months demonstrated no significant difference between the control and treated eyes. The results justify a larger clinical trial over a longer period of time in order to identify any treatment effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5751865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57518652018-01-19 Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial Wagner, Siegfried K Jolly, Jasleen K Pefkianaki, Maria Gekeler, Florian Webster, Andrew R Downes, Susan M Maclaren, Robert E BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of weekly transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) over a 6-month period as a treatment for retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective open-label observational trial was carried out assessing weekly TES in participants with RP for a period of 6 months followed by observation for a further 6 months. Clinical examination and investigations were carried out at 3 monthly intervals for a total of 12 months. The primary outcome measure explored safety through a descriptive analysis of adverse effects with secondary outcome measures evaluating structural and functional efficacy. RESULTS: Seven male and seven female participants with RP aged 18–80 years were recruited. TES was well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. Two participants reported transient foreign body sensation and one participant had discomfort underneath the skin electrode. Following 6 months of TES, best-corrected visual acuity increased by 1.1±1.4 letters in the control arm and 0.93±1.4 letters in the treated arm. Central microperimetry threshold sensitivity rose by 0.02±0.5 decibels (dB) and 0.37±0.4 dB and Goldmann visual field volume by 0.16±0.09 steradians (sr) vs 0.22±0.12 sr for the control and treated eye, respectively. There was no statistical significance seen between eyes following the treatment or observation period. CONCLUSION: This small open-label clinical trial showed that TES was safe and well tolerated in patients with RP. Visual function measurements at 6 months demonstrated no significant difference between the control and treated eyes. The results justify a larger clinical trial over a longer period of time in order to identify any treatment effect. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5751865/ /pubmed/29354722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000096 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Wagner, Siegfried K
Jolly, Jasleen K
Pefkianaki, Maria
Gekeler, Florian
Webster, Andrew R
Downes, Susan M
Maclaren, Robert E
Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial
title Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial
title_full Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial
title_fullStr Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial
title_full_unstemmed Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial
title_short Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial
title_sort transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the tesolauk trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000096
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnersiegfriedk transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial
AT jollyjasleenk transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial
AT pefkianakimaria transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial
AT gekelerflorian transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial
AT websterandrewr transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial
AT downessusanm transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial
AT maclarenroberte transcornealelectricalstimulationforthetreatmentofretinitispigmentosaresultsfromthetesolauktrial