Cargando…

A Weight Estimation Strategy for Preterm and Full-Term Infants

Weight is the foremost marker of health outcomes in infants; however, the majority of community workers and health care providers in remote, resource-constrained settings have limited access to functional scales. This study develops and validates a simple weight estimation strategy for infants that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdel-Rahman, Susan M., Paul, Ian M., Delmore, Paula, James, Laura, Fearn, Laura, Atz, Andrew, Poindexter, Brenda, Al-Uzri, Amira, Lewandowski, Andrew, Harper, Barrie, Smith, P. Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29308426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333794X17748775
_version_ 1783290047608389632
author Abdel-Rahman, Susan M.
Paul, Ian M.
Delmore, Paula
James, Laura
Fearn, Laura
Atz, Andrew
Poindexter, Brenda
Al-Uzri, Amira
Lewandowski, Andrew
Harper, Barrie
Smith, P. Brian
author_facet Abdel-Rahman, Susan M.
Paul, Ian M.
Delmore, Paula
James, Laura
Fearn, Laura
Atz, Andrew
Poindexter, Brenda
Al-Uzri, Amira
Lewandowski, Andrew
Harper, Barrie
Smith, P. Brian
author_sort Abdel-Rahman, Susan M.
collection PubMed
description Weight is the foremost marker of health outcomes in infants; however, the majority of community workers and health care providers in remote, resource-constrained settings have limited access to functional scales. This study develops and validates a simple weight estimation strategy for infants that addresses the limitations of current approaches. Circumferential and segmental anthropometric measures were evaluated for their relationship to infant weight and length. Data derived from 2097 US infants (n = 1681 for model development, n = 416 for validation). Statistical and practical considerations informed final measurement selection. Head circumference and chest circumference demonstrated the best correlations with weight (r = 0.89) and length (r = 0.94 and 0.93), and were among the most reproducible as reflected by intraclass correlation coefficients (>0.98). The head circumference and chest circumference combination offered better goodness-of-fit and smaller limits of agreement than did either measure alone. The final model predicted weight within 10% and 15% of actual for 84% and 94% of infants, respectively, with no bias for postnatal age (P = .76), gestational age (P = .10), and sex (P = .25). The model requires simple summation to generate a weight estimate and can be embodied as a low-cost, paper-based device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5751918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57519182018-01-05 A Weight Estimation Strategy for Preterm and Full-Term Infants Abdel-Rahman, Susan M. Paul, Ian M. Delmore, Paula James, Laura Fearn, Laura Atz, Andrew Poindexter, Brenda Al-Uzri, Amira Lewandowski, Andrew Harper, Barrie Smith, P. Brian Glob Pediatr Health Original Article Weight is the foremost marker of health outcomes in infants; however, the majority of community workers and health care providers in remote, resource-constrained settings have limited access to functional scales. This study develops and validates a simple weight estimation strategy for infants that addresses the limitations of current approaches. Circumferential and segmental anthropometric measures were evaluated for their relationship to infant weight and length. Data derived from 2097 US infants (n = 1681 for model development, n = 416 for validation). Statistical and practical considerations informed final measurement selection. Head circumference and chest circumference demonstrated the best correlations with weight (r = 0.89) and length (r = 0.94 and 0.93), and were among the most reproducible as reflected by intraclass correlation coefficients (>0.98). The head circumference and chest circumference combination offered better goodness-of-fit and smaller limits of agreement than did either measure alone. The final model predicted weight within 10% and 15% of actual for 84% and 94% of infants, respectively, with no bias for postnatal age (P = .76), gestational age (P = .10), and sex (P = .25). The model requires simple summation to generate a weight estimate and can be embodied as a low-cost, paper-based device. SAGE Publications 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5751918/ /pubmed/29308426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333794X17748775 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Abdel-Rahman, Susan M.
Paul, Ian M.
Delmore, Paula
James, Laura
Fearn, Laura
Atz, Andrew
Poindexter, Brenda
Al-Uzri, Amira
Lewandowski, Andrew
Harper, Barrie
Smith, P. Brian
A Weight Estimation Strategy for Preterm and Full-Term Infants
title A Weight Estimation Strategy for Preterm and Full-Term Infants
title_full A Weight Estimation Strategy for Preterm and Full-Term Infants
title_fullStr A Weight Estimation Strategy for Preterm and Full-Term Infants
title_full_unstemmed A Weight Estimation Strategy for Preterm and Full-Term Infants
title_short A Weight Estimation Strategy for Preterm and Full-Term Infants
title_sort weight estimation strategy for preterm and full-term infants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5751918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29308426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333794X17748775
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelrahmansusanm aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT paulianm aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT delmorepaula aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT jameslaura aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT fearnlaura aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT atzandrew aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT poindexterbrenda aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT aluzriamira aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT lewandowskiandrew aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT harperbarrie aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT smithpbrian aweightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT abdelrahmansusanm weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT paulianm weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT delmorepaula weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT jameslaura weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT fearnlaura weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT atzandrew weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT poindexterbrenda weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT aluzriamira weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT lewandowskiandrew weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT harperbarrie weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants
AT smithpbrian weightestimationstrategyforpretermandfullterminfants