Cargando…

Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images

For several decades, 5-methylcytosine (5mC) has been thought to be the only DNA modification with a functional significance in metazoans. The discovery of enzymatic oxidation of 5mC to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC) as well as detection of N6-met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramsawhook, Ashley H., Lewis, Lara C., Eleftheriou, Maria, Abakir, Abdulkadir, Durczak, Paulina, Markus, Robert, Rajani, Seema, Hannan, Nicholas R.F., Coyle, Beth, Ruzov, Alexey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MyJove Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5752195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28930980
http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/56318
_version_ 1783290087306428416
author Ramsawhook, Ashley H.
Lewis, Lara C.
Eleftheriou, Maria
Abakir, Abdulkadir
Durczak, Paulina
Markus, Robert
Rajani, Seema
Hannan, Nicholas R.F.
Coyle, Beth
Ruzov, Alexey
author_facet Ramsawhook, Ashley H.
Lewis, Lara C.
Eleftheriou, Maria
Abakir, Abdulkadir
Durczak, Paulina
Markus, Robert
Rajani, Seema
Hannan, Nicholas R.F.
Coyle, Beth
Ruzov, Alexey
author_sort Ramsawhook, Ashley H.
collection PubMed
description For several decades, 5-methylcytosine (5mC) has been thought to be the only DNA modification with a functional significance in metazoans. The discovery of enzymatic oxidation of 5mC to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC) as well as detection of N6-methyladenine (6mA) in the DNA of multicellular organisms provided additional degrees of complexity to the epigenetic research. According to a growing body of experimental evidence, these novel DNA modifications may play specific roles in different cellular and developmental processes. Importantly, as some of these marks (e. g. 5hmC, 5fC and 5caC) exhibit tissue- and developmental stage-specific occurrence in vertebrates, immunochemistry represents an important tool allowing assessment of spatial distribution of DNA modifications in different biological contexts. Here the methods for computational analysis of DNA modifications visualized by immunostaining followed by confocal microscopy are described. Specifically, the generation of 2.5 dimension (2.5D) signal intensity plots, signal intensity profiles, quantification of staining intensity in multiple cells and determination of signal colocalization coefficients are shown. Collectively, these techniques may be operational in evaluating the levels and localization of these DNA modifications in the nucleus, contributing to elucidating their biological roles in metazoans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5752195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MyJove Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57521952018-01-19 Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images Ramsawhook, Ashley H. Lewis, Lara C. Eleftheriou, Maria Abakir, Abdulkadir Durczak, Paulina Markus, Robert Rajani, Seema Hannan, Nicholas R.F. Coyle, Beth Ruzov, Alexey J Vis Exp Genetics For several decades, 5-methylcytosine (5mC) has been thought to be the only DNA modification with a functional significance in metazoans. The discovery of enzymatic oxidation of 5mC to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC) as well as detection of N6-methyladenine (6mA) in the DNA of multicellular organisms provided additional degrees of complexity to the epigenetic research. According to a growing body of experimental evidence, these novel DNA modifications may play specific roles in different cellular and developmental processes. Importantly, as some of these marks (e. g. 5hmC, 5fC and 5caC) exhibit tissue- and developmental stage-specific occurrence in vertebrates, immunochemistry represents an important tool allowing assessment of spatial distribution of DNA modifications in different biological contexts. Here the methods for computational analysis of DNA modifications visualized by immunostaining followed by confocal microscopy are described. Specifically, the generation of 2.5 dimension (2.5D) signal intensity plots, signal intensity profiles, quantification of staining intensity in multiple cells and determination of signal colocalization coefficients are shown. Collectively, these techniques may be operational in evaluating the levels and localization of these DNA modifications in the nucleus, contributing to elucidating their biological roles in metazoans. MyJove Corporation 2017-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5752195/ /pubmed/28930980 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/56318 Text en Copyright © 2017, Journal of Visualized Experiments http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
spellingShingle Genetics
Ramsawhook, Ashley H.
Lewis, Lara C.
Eleftheriou, Maria
Abakir, Abdulkadir
Durczak, Paulina
Markus, Robert
Rajani, Seema
Hannan, Nicholas R.F.
Coyle, Beth
Ruzov, Alexey
Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images
title Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images
title_full Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images
title_fullStr Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images
title_full_unstemmed Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images
title_short Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images
title_sort immunostaining for dna modifications: computational analysis of confocal images
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5752195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28930980
http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/56318
work_keys_str_mv AT ramsawhookashleyh immunostainingfordnamodificationscomputationalanalysisofconfocalimages
AT lewislarac immunostainingfordnamodificationscomputationalanalysisofconfocalimages
AT eleftherioumaria immunostainingfordnamodificationscomputationalanalysisofconfocalimages
AT abakirabdulkadir immunostainingfordnamodificationscomputationalanalysisofconfocalimages
AT durczakpaulina immunostainingfordnamodificationscomputationalanalysisofconfocalimages
AT markusrobert immunostainingfordnamodificationscomputationalanalysisofconfocalimages
AT rajaniseema immunostainingfordnamodificationscomputationalanalysisofconfocalimages
AT hannannicholasrf immunostainingfordnamodificationscomputationalanalysisofconfocalimages
AT coylebeth immunostainingfordnamodificationscomputationalanalysisofconfocalimages
AT ruzovalexey immunostainingfordnamodificationscomputationalanalysisofconfocalimages