Cargando…

Prognostic significance of pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in gastric cancer with pathological lymph node-negative: A large sample single-center retrospective study

AIM: To assess whether elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is in the inferior prognosis for pathological lymph node-negative (pN(0)) gastric cancer (GC) patients who underwent D(2) gastrectomy. METHODS: About 469 pN(0) GC patients, who received D(2) radical gastrectomy were retrospectively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Jun, Ye, Zai-Sheng, Wei, Sheng-Hong, Zeng, Yi, Lin, Zhen-Meng, Wang, Yi, Teng, Wen-Hao, Chen, Lu-Chuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5752716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8562
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To assess whether elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is in the inferior prognosis for pathological lymph node-negative (pN(0)) gastric cancer (GC) patients who underwent D(2) gastrectomy. METHODS: About 469 pN(0) GC patients, who received D(2) radical gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The X-tile plots cut-off point for CEA were 30.02 ng/mL using minimum P-value from log-rank χ(2) statistics, and pN(0) GC patients were assigned to two groups: those more than 30.02 ng/mL (n = 48; CEA-high group) and those less than 30.02 ng/mL (n = 421; CEA-low group). Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared using Pearson's χ(2) or Fisher’s exact tests, and survival curves were so manufactured using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were carried out using the logistic regression method. RESULTS: The percentage of vessel carcinoma embolus (31.35% vs 17.1%) and advanced GC (T(2-4b)) (81.25% vs 65.32%) were higher in CEA-high group than CEA-low group. The CEA-positive patients had a significantly poorer prognosis than the CEA-nagetive patients in terms of overall survival (57.74% vs 90.69%, P < 0.05), and no different was found between subgroup of T category, differentiation, nerve invasion, and vessel carcinoma embolus (all P > 0.05). Multivariate survival analysis showed that CEA (OR = 4.924), and T category (OR = 2.214) were significant prognostic factors for stage pN(0) GC (all P < 0.05). Besides, only T category (OR = 1.962) was an independent hazard factor in the CEA-high group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Those pretreatment serum CEA levels over 30.02 ng/mL on behalf of worse characteristics and unfavourable tumor behavior, and a poor prognosis for a nearly doubled risk of mortality in GC patients.