Cargando…
Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation
AIM: To describe the development and implementation of a person-centered endoscopy safety checklist and to evaluate the effects of a “checklist intervention”. METHODS: The checklist, based on previously published safety checklists, was developed and locally adapted, taking patient safety aspects int...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5752721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8605 |
_version_ | 1783290150229377024 |
---|---|
author | Dubois, Hanna Schmidt, Peter T Creutzfeldt, Johan Bergenmar, Mia |
author_facet | Dubois, Hanna Schmidt, Peter T Creutzfeldt, Johan Bergenmar, Mia |
author_sort | Dubois, Hanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To describe the development and implementation of a person-centered endoscopy safety checklist and to evaluate the effects of a “checklist intervention”. METHODS: The checklist, based on previously published safety checklists, was developed and locally adapted, taking patient safety aspects into consideration and using a person-centered approach. This novel checklist was introduced to the staff of an endoscopy unit at a Stockholm University Hospital during half-day seminars and team training sessions. Structured observations of the endoscopy team’s performance were conducted before and after the introduction of the checklist. In addition, questionnaires focusing on patient participation, collaboration climate, and patient safety issues were collected from patients and staff. RESULTS: A person-centered safety checklist was developed and introduced by a multi-professional group in the endoscopy unit. A statistically significant increase in accurate patient identity verification by the physicians was noted (from 0% at baseline to 87% after 10 mo, P < 0.001), and remained high among nurses (93% at baseline vs 96% after 10 mo, P = nonsignificant). Observations indicated that the professional staff made frequent attempts to use the checklist, but compliance was suboptimal: All items in the observed nurse-led “summaries” were included in 56% of these interactions, and physicians participated by directly facing the patient in 50% of the interactions. On the questionnaires administered to the staff, items regarding collaboration and the importance of patient participation were rated more highly after the introduction of the checklist, but this did not result in statistical significance (P = 0.07/P = 0.08). The patients rated almost all items as very high both before and after the introduction of the checklist; hence, no statistical difference was noted. CONCLUSION: The intervention led to increased patient identity verification by physicians - a patient safety improvement. Clear evidence of enhanced person-centeredness or team work was not found. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5752721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57527212018-01-22 Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation Dubois, Hanna Schmidt, Peter T Creutzfeldt, Johan Bergenmar, Mia World J Gastroenterol Observational Study AIM: To describe the development and implementation of a person-centered endoscopy safety checklist and to evaluate the effects of a “checklist intervention”. METHODS: The checklist, based on previously published safety checklists, was developed and locally adapted, taking patient safety aspects into consideration and using a person-centered approach. This novel checklist was introduced to the staff of an endoscopy unit at a Stockholm University Hospital during half-day seminars and team training sessions. Structured observations of the endoscopy team’s performance were conducted before and after the introduction of the checklist. In addition, questionnaires focusing on patient participation, collaboration climate, and patient safety issues were collected from patients and staff. RESULTS: A person-centered safety checklist was developed and introduced by a multi-professional group in the endoscopy unit. A statistically significant increase in accurate patient identity verification by the physicians was noted (from 0% at baseline to 87% after 10 mo, P < 0.001), and remained high among nurses (93% at baseline vs 96% after 10 mo, P = nonsignificant). Observations indicated that the professional staff made frequent attempts to use the checklist, but compliance was suboptimal: All items in the observed nurse-led “summaries” were included in 56% of these interactions, and physicians participated by directly facing the patient in 50% of the interactions. On the questionnaires administered to the staff, items regarding collaboration and the importance of patient participation were rated more highly after the introduction of the checklist, but this did not result in statistical significance (P = 0.07/P = 0.08). The patients rated almost all items as very high both before and after the introduction of the checklist; hence, no statistical difference was noted. CONCLUSION: The intervention led to increased patient identity verification by physicians - a patient safety improvement. Clear evidence of enhanced person-centeredness or team work was not found. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-12-28 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5752721/ /pubmed/29358869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8605 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Dubois, Hanna Schmidt, Peter T Creutzfeldt, Johan Bergenmar, Mia Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation |
title | Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation |
title_full | Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation |
title_fullStr | Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation |
title_short | Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation |
title_sort | person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: development, implementation, and evaluation |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5752721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duboishanna personcenteredendoscopysafetychecklistdevelopmentimplementationandevaluation AT schmidtpetert personcenteredendoscopysafetychecklistdevelopmentimplementationandevaluation AT creutzfeldtjohan personcenteredendoscopysafetychecklistdevelopmentimplementationandevaluation AT bergenmarmia personcenteredendoscopysafetychecklistdevelopmentimplementationandevaluation |