Cargando…

Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation

AIM: To describe the development and implementation of a person-centered endoscopy safety checklist and to evaluate the effects of a “checklist intervention”. METHODS: The checklist, based on previously published safety checklists, was developed and locally adapted, taking patient safety aspects int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dubois, Hanna, Schmidt, Peter T, Creutzfeldt, Johan, Bergenmar, Mia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5752721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358869
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8605
_version_ 1783290150229377024
author Dubois, Hanna
Schmidt, Peter T
Creutzfeldt, Johan
Bergenmar, Mia
author_facet Dubois, Hanna
Schmidt, Peter T
Creutzfeldt, Johan
Bergenmar, Mia
author_sort Dubois, Hanna
collection PubMed
description AIM: To describe the development and implementation of a person-centered endoscopy safety checklist and to evaluate the effects of a “checklist intervention”. METHODS: The checklist, based on previously published safety checklists, was developed and locally adapted, taking patient safety aspects into consideration and using a person-centered approach. This novel checklist was introduced to the staff of an endoscopy unit at a Stockholm University Hospital during half-day seminars and team training sessions. Structured observations of the endoscopy team’s performance were conducted before and after the introduction of the checklist. In addition, questionnaires focusing on patient participation, collaboration climate, and patient safety issues were collected from patients and staff. RESULTS: A person-centered safety checklist was developed and introduced by a multi-professional group in the endoscopy unit. A statistically significant increase in accurate patient identity verification by the physicians was noted (from 0% at baseline to 87% after 10 mo, P < 0.001), and remained high among nurses (93% at baseline vs 96% after 10 mo, P = nonsignificant). Observations indicated that the professional staff made frequent attempts to use the checklist, but compliance was suboptimal: All items in the observed nurse-led “summaries” were included in 56% of these interactions, and physicians participated by directly facing the patient in 50% of the interactions. On the questionnaires administered to the staff, items regarding collaboration and the importance of patient participation were rated more highly after the introduction of the checklist, but this did not result in statistical significance (P = 0.07/P = 0.08). The patients rated almost all items as very high both before and after the introduction of the checklist; hence, no statistical difference was noted. CONCLUSION: The intervention led to increased patient identity verification by physicians - a patient safety improvement. Clear evidence of enhanced person-centeredness or team work was not found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5752721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57527212018-01-22 Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation Dubois, Hanna Schmidt, Peter T Creutzfeldt, Johan Bergenmar, Mia World J Gastroenterol Observational Study AIM: To describe the development and implementation of a person-centered endoscopy safety checklist and to evaluate the effects of a “checklist intervention”. METHODS: The checklist, based on previously published safety checklists, was developed and locally adapted, taking patient safety aspects into consideration and using a person-centered approach. This novel checklist was introduced to the staff of an endoscopy unit at a Stockholm University Hospital during half-day seminars and team training sessions. Structured observations of the endoscopy team’s performance were conducted before and after the introduction of the checklist. In addition, questionnaires focusing on patient participation, collaboration climate, and patient safety issues were collected from patients and staff. RESULTS: A person-centered safety checklist was developed and introduced by a multi-professional group in the endoscopy unit. A statistically significant increase in accurate patient identity verification by the physicians was noted (from 0% at baseline to 87% after 10 mo, P < 0.001), and remained high among nurses (93% at baseline vs 96% after 10 mo, P = nonsignificant). Observations indicated that the professional staff made frequent attempts to use the checklist, but compliance was suboptimal: All items in the observed nurse-led “summaries” were included in 56% of these interactions, and physicians participated by directly facing the patient in 50% of the interactions. On the questionnaires administered to the staff, items regarding collaboration and the importance of patient participation were rated more highly after the introduction of the checklist, but this did not result in statistical significance (P = 0.07/P = 0.08). The patients rated almost all items as very high both before and after the introduction of the checklist; hence, no statistical difference was noted. CONCLUSION: The intervention led to increased patient identity verification by physicians - a patient safety improvement. Clear evidence of enhanced person-centeredness or team work was not found. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-12-28 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5752721/ /pubmed/29358869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8605 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Dubois, Hanna
Schmidt, Peter T
Creutzfeldt, Johan
Bergenmar, Mia
Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation
title Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation
title_full Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation
title_fullStr Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation
title_short Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation
title_sort person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: development, implementation, and evaluation
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5752721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358869
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8605
work_keys_str_mv AT duboishanna personcenteredendoscopysafetychecklistdevelopmentimplementationandevaluation
AT schmidtpetert personcenteredendoscopysafetychecklistdevelopmentimplementationandevaluation
AT creutzfeldtjohan personcenteredendoscopysafetychecklistdevelopmentimplementationandevaluation
AT bergenmarmia personcenteredendoscopysafetychecklistdevelopmentimplementationandevaluation