Cargando…

Advance care planning: challenges at the emergency department of a cancer care center

INTRODUCTION: Code status discussions form an important part of advance care planning (ACP) as it enables physicians to respect the patient’s wishes for end-of-life care. However, in some cases, code status discussions can be challenging causing the physician to go against the patient’s wishes and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz-Carreras, Maria T., Chaftari, Patrick, Viets-Upchurch, Jayne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5752753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28918550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3870-x
_version_ 1783290157501251584
author Cruz-Carreras, Maria T.
Chaftari, Patrick
Viets-Upchurch, Jayne
author_facet Cruz-Carreras, Maria T.
Chaftari, Patrick
Viets-Upchurch, Jayne
author_sort Cruz-Carreras, Maria T.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Code status discussions form an important part of advance care planning (ACP) as it enables physicians to respect the patient’s wishes for end-of-life care. However, in some cases, code status discussions can be challenging causing the physician to go against the patient’s wishes and the code of medical ethics. This is especially true in an emergency setting. In this paper, we will discuss three cases of advanced cancer patients, where code status discussions posed challenges to healthcare providers. CASE REPORTS: In the first case, the patient was a 26-year-old male diagnosed with advanced osteosarcoma. Code status was discussed with him, while he was still functional, wherein he agreed to a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. However, at the time of end-of-life care, despite of previous code status agreement, the patient’s mother insisted on full code. As a result, the DNR order was reverted and the patient was intubated. The second case discusses an 83-year-old female patient with metastatic gastric cancer. Code status was extensively discussed with the patient and her son who agreed to sign a DNR order. This case posed a challenge because when the patient’s condition deteriorated, her son demanded cardioversion and other aggressive treatment measures without any chest compressions or intubation. In the third case, the patient was a 40-year-old woman with advanced metastatic adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features of the parotid. On admission to the ED, as per the patient’s wishes expressed by her husband, a DNR/DNI order was placed. However, this order had to be reverted when the patient’s aunt and sister opposed vehemently to the DNR/DNI order. CONCLUSION: The three cases demonstrate the challenges that can arise in the implementation of code status order in the ED as it pertains for end-of-life care. In any scenario, respecting the patient’s wishes and adherence to the code of medical ethics take precedence over any familial objections arising difficulties with coping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5752753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57527532018-01-22 Advance care planning: challenges at the emergency department of a cancer care center Cruz-Carreras, Maria T. Chaftari, Patrick Viets-Upchurch, Jayne Support Care Cancer Original Article INTRODUCTION: Code status discussions form an important part of advance care planning (ACP) as it enables physicians to respect the patient’s wishes for end-of-life care. However, in some cases, code status discussions can be challenging causing the physician to go against the patient’s wishes and the code of medical ethics. This is especially true in an emergency setting. In this paper, we will discuss three cases of advanced cancer patients, where code status discussions posed challenges to healthcare providers. CASE REPORTS: In the first case, the patient was a 26-year-old male diagnosed with advanced osteosarcoma. Code status was discussed with him, while he was still functional, wherein he agreed to a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. However, at the time of end-of-life care, despite of previous code status agreement, the patient’s mother insisted on full code. As a result, the DNR order was reverted and the patient was intubated. The second case discusses an 83-year-old female patient with metastatic gastric cancer. Code status was extensively discussed with the patient and her son who agreed to sign a DNR order. This case posed a challenge because when the patient’s condition deteriorated, her son demanded cardioversion and other aggressive treatment measures without any chest compressions or intubation. In the third case, the patient was a 40-year-old woman with advanced metastatic adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features of the parotid. On admission to the ED, as per the patient’s wishes expressed by her husband, a DNR/DNI order was placed. However, this order had to be reverted when the patient’s aunt and sister opposed vehemently to the DNR/DNI order. CONCLUSION: The three cases demonstrate the challenges that can arise in the implementation of code status order in the ED as it pertains for end-of-life care. In any scenario, respecting the patient’s wishes and adherence to the code of medical ethics take precedence over any familial objections arising difficulties with coping. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-16 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5752753/ /pubmed/28918550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3870-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cruz-Carreras, Maria T.
Chaftari, Patrick
Viets-Upchurch, Jayne
Advance care planning: challenges at the emergency department of a cancer care center
title Advance care planning: challenges at the emergency department of a cancer care center
title_full Advance care planning: challenges at the emergency department of a cancer care center
title_fullStr Advance care planning: challenges at the emergency department of a cancer care center
title_full_unstemmed Advance care planning: challenges at the emergency department of a cancer care center
title_short Advance care planning: challenges at the emergency department of a cancer care center
title_sort advance care planning: challenges at the emergency department of a cancer care center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5752753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28918550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3870-x
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzcarrerasmariat advancecareplanningchallengesattheemergencydepartmentofacancercarecenter
AT chaftaripatrick advancecareplanningchallengesattheemergencydepartmentofacancercarecenter
AT vietsupchurchjayne advancecareplanningchallengesattheemergencydepartmentofacancercarecenter