Cargando…

Incidence of Varus Malalignment Post Interlocking Nail in Proximal Femur Shaft Fractures Comparing Two Types of Entry Points

Introduction: Osteosynthesis of the femur using an interlocking nail is the gold standard for treating diaphyseal fractures of the femur. There are two established entry points for the antegrade interlocking nails which is the piriformis fossa or the greater trochanter. It has been reported that var...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadagatullah, AN, Nazeeb, MN, Ibrahim, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326763
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1711.013
_version_ 1783290291025870848
author Sadagatullah, AN
Nazeeb, MN
Ibrahim, S
author_facet Sadagatullah, AN
Nazeeb, MN
Ibrahim, S
author_sort Sadagatullah, AN
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Osteosynthesis of the femur using an interlocking nail is the gold standard for treating diaphyseal fractures of the femur. There are two established entry points for the antegrade interlocking nails which is the piriformis fossa or the greater trochanter. It has been reported that varus malalignment was frequently seen in proximal femur fracture which were treated with interlocking nail utilizing the greater trochanter entry point. The study was done to find out if the problem was of significance. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study which included 179 patients with femur fractures which were treated from January 2013 till September 2015 in one Hospital. They were treated with interlocking nail either by utilizing the piriformis fossa (PF) or the greater trochanter (GT) entry points. Post-operative radiographs of the femur were used to measure the varus deformity. Results: Out of 179 patients, there were 5 patients who were reported to have unacceptable varus malalignment (2.79%). These 5 patients were out of the 88 (5.68%) patients utilizing the greater trochanter as the entry point. The same 5 patients were out 90 patients that were diagnosed with proximal femur shaft fractures (5.55%). Analysis with logistic regression was statistically not significant. Conclusion: There was higher rate of varus malalignment seen in proximal femur shaft fractures treated with interlocking nails utilizing the greater trochanter entry point. The incidence of varus malalignment was not significant statistically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5753525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57535252018-01-11 Incidence of Varus Malalignment Post Interlocking Nail in Proximal Femur Shaft Fractures Comparing Two Types of Entry Points Sadagatullah, AN Nazeeb, MN Ibrahim, S Malays Orthop J Original Article Introduction: Osteosynthesis of the femur using an interlocking nail is the gold standard for treating diaphyseal fractures of the femur. There are two established entry points for the antegrade interlocking nails which is the piriformis fossa or the greater trochanter. It has been reported that varus malalignment was frequently seen in proximal femur fracture which were treated with interlocking nail utilizing the greater trochanter entry point. The study was done to find out if the problem was of significance. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study which included 179 patients with femur fractures which were treated from January 2013 till September 2015 in one Hospital. They were treated with interlocking nail either by utilizing the piriformis fossa (PF) or the greater trochanter (GT) entry points. Post-operative radiographs of the femur were used to measure the varus deformity. Results: Out of 179 patients, there were 5 patients who were reported to have unacceptable varus malalignment (2.79%). These 5 patients were out of the 88 (5.68%) patients utilizing the greater trochanter as the entry point. The same 5 patients were out 90 patients that were diagnosed with proximal femur shaft fractures (5.55%). Analysis with logistic regression was statistically not significant. Conclusion: There was higher rate of varus malalignment seen in proximal femur shaft fractures treated with interlocking nails utilizing the greater trochanter entry point. The incidence of varus malalignment was not significant statistically. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5753525/ /pubmed/29326763 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1711.013 Text en © 2017 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA). All Rights Reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Original Article
Sadagatullah, AN
Nazeeb, MN
Ibrahim, S
Incidence of Varus Malalignment Post Interlocking Nail in Proximal Femur Shaft Fractures Comparing Two Types of Entry Points
title Incidence of Varus Malalignment Post Interlocking Nail in Proximal Femur Shaft Fractures Comparing Two Types of Entry Points
title_full Incidence of Varus Malalignment Post Interlocking Nail in Proximal Femur Shaft Fractures Comparing Two Types of Entry Points
title_fullStr Incidence of Varus Malalignment Post Interlocking Nail in Proximal Femur Shaft Fractures Comparing Two Types of Entry Points
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of Varus Malalignment Post Interlocking Nail in Proximal Femur Shaft Fractures Comparing Two Types of Entry Points
title_short Incidence of Varus Malalignment Post Interlocking Nail in Proximal Femur Shaft Fractures Comparing Two Types of Entry Points
title_sort incidence of varus malalignment post interlocking nail in proximal femur shaft fractures comparing two types of entry points
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326763
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1711.013
work_keys_str_mv AT sadagatullahan incidenceofvarusmalalignmentpostinterlockingnailinproximalfemurshaftfracturescomparingtwotypesofentrypoints
AT nazeebmn incidenceofvarusmalalignmentpostinterlockingnailinproximalfemurshaftfracturescomparingtwotypesofentrypoints
AT ibrahims incidenceofvarusmalalignmentpostinterlockingnailinproximalfemurshaftfracturescomparingtwotypesofentrypoints