Cargando…

Evaluation of the impact of glycemic status on the progression of coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic individuals

BACKGROUND: Data on the influence of glycemic status on the progression of coronary calcification, an important marker for future adverse cardiovascular events, are limited. METHODS: Data from the Korea Initiatives on Coronary Artery Calcification (KOICA) registry on 12,441 asymptomatic Korean adult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Won, Ki-Bum, Han, Donghee, Lee, Ji Hyun, Lee, Sang-Eun, Sung, Ji Min, Choi, Su-Yeon, Chun, Eun Ju, Park, Sung Hak, Han, Hae-Won, Sung, Jidong, Jung, Hae Ok, Chang, Hyuk-Jae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29301531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0653-0
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Data on the influence of glycemic status on the progression of coronary calcification, an important marker for future adverse cardiovascular events, are limited. METHODS: Data from the Korea Initiatives on Coronary Artery Calcification (KOICA) registry on 12,441 asymptomatic Korean adults (52 ± 9 years, 84.2% males) without previous history of coronary artery disease and stroke, who underwent serial coronary artery calcification (CAC) screening examinations, were included in this study. The median inter-scan period was 3.0 (2.0–4.8) years. All participants were categorized into three groups based on their glycemic status: normal (n = 6578), pre-diabetes (n = 4146), and diabetes (n = 1717). CAC progression was defined as a difference ≥ 2.5 between the square roots (√) of the baseline and follow-up CAC scores. RESULTS: The incidence of CAC progression was significantly different between the three groups (normal, 26.3%; pre-diabetes, 30.9%; and diabetes, 46.9%; p < 0.001). In the univariate logistic analysis, the risk of CAC progression was higher in the pre-diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.253; 95% confidential interval [CI] 1.150–1.366) and diabetes (OR 2.471; 95% CI 2.215–2.758) groups than in the normal group (p < 0.001, both). In the multivariate logistic analysis, the risk of CAC progression was not significantly different between the normal and pre-diabetes groups but was significantly higher in the diabetes group than in the normal group. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic subjects, diabetes had an incremental impact on CAC progression; however, pre-diabetes did not increase the risk of CAC progression after adjusting for confounding factors.