Cargando…
Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia)
BACKGROUND—: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between surgical reconstruction and endovascular therapy (EVT) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in today’s real-world settings. METHODS AND RESULTS—: This multicenter, prospective, observational study registered and followed 548 Jap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005531 |
_version_ | 1783290327123099648 |
---|---|
author | Iida, Osamu Takahara, Mitsuyoshi Soga, Yoshimitsu Kodama, Akio Terashi, Hiroto Azuma, Nobuyoshi |
author_facet | Iida, Osamu Takahara, Mitsuyoshi Soga, Yoshimitsu Kodama, Akio Terashi, Hiroto Azuma, Nobuyoshi |
author_sort | Iida, Osamu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND—: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between surgical reconstruction and endovascular therapy (EVT) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in today’s real-world settings. METHODS AND RESULTS—: This multicenter, prospective, observational study registered and followed 548 Japanese CLI patients. The registration was in advance of revascularization; 197 patients were scheduled to receive surgical reconstruction, and the remaining 351 were scheduled to receive EVT. The primary end point was 3-year amputation-free survival, compared between the 2 treatments in an intention-to-treat manner, using propensity score matching. Interaction analysis was additionally performed to explore which subgroups had better outcomes with surgical reconstruction or EVT. After propensity score matching, the 3-year amputation-free survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (52% [95% confidence interval, 43%–60%] and 52% [95% confidence interval, 44–60%]; P=0.26). Subsequent interaction analysis identified (1) Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification W-3, (2) fI-2/3, (3) history of ipsilateral minor amputation, (4) history of revascularization after CLI onset, and (5) bilateral CLI as the factors more favorable for surgical reconstruction, whereas (1) diabetes mellitus, (2) renal failure, (3) anemia, (4) history of nonadherence to cardiovascular risk management, and (5) contralateral major amputation were as those less favorable for surgical reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS—: The 3-year amputation-free survival was not different between surgical reconstruction and EVT in the overall CLI population. The subsequent interaction analysis suggested that there would be a subgroup more suited for surgical reconstruction and another benefiting more from EVT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/. Unique identifier: UMIN000007050. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5753823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57538232018-01-31 Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) Iida, Osamu Takahara, Mitsuyoshi Soga, Yoshimitsu Kodama, Akio Terashi, Hiroto Azuma, Nobuyoshi Circ Cardiovasc Interv Original Articles BACKGROUND—: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between surgical reconstruction and endovascular therapy (EVT) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in today’s real-world settings. METHODS AND RESULTS—: This multicenter, prospective, observational study registered and followed 548 Japanese CLI patients. The registration was in advance of revascularization; 197 patients were scheduled to receive surgical reconstruction, and the remaining 351 were scheduled to receive EVT. The primary end point was 3-year amputation-free survival, compared between the 2 treatments in an intention-to-treat manner, using propensity score matching. Interaction analysis was additionally performed to explore which subgroups had better outcomes with surgical reconstruction or EVT. After propensity score matching, the 3-year amputation-free survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (52% [95% confidence interval, 43%–60%] and 52% [95% confidence interval, 44–60%]; P=0.26). Subsequent interaction analysis identified (1) Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification W-3, (2) fI-2/3, (3) history of ipsilateral minor amputation, (4) history of revascularization after CLI onset, and (5) bilateral CLI as the factors more favorable for surgical reconstruction, whereas (1) diabetes mellitus, (2) renal failure, (3) anemia, (4) history of nonadherence to cardiovascular risk management, and (5) contralateral major amputation were as those less favorable for surgical reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS—: The 3-year amputation-free survival was not different between surgical reconstruction and EVT in the overall CLI population. The subsequent interaction analysis suggested that there would be a subgroup more suited for surgical reconstruction and another benefiting more from EVT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/. Unique identifier: UMIN000007050. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-12 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5753823/ /pubmed/29246911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005531 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Iida, Osamu Takahara, Mitsuyoshi Soga, Yoshimitsu Kodama, Akio Terashi, Hiroto Azuma, Nobuyoshi Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) |
title | Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) |
title_full | Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) |
title_fullStr | Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) |
title_full_unstemmed | Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) |
title_short | Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) |
title_sort | three-year outcomes of surgical versus endovascular revascularization for critical limb ischemia: the spinach study (surgical reconstruction versus peripheral intervention in patients with critical limb ischemia) |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iidaosamu threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia AT takaharamitsuyoshi threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia AT sogayoshimitsu threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia AT kodamaakio threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia AT terashihiroto threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia AT azumanobuyoshi threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia |