Cargando…

Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia)

BACKGROUND—: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between surgical reconstruction and endovascular therapy (EVT) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in today’s real-world settings. METHODS AND RESULTS—: This multicenter, prospective, observational study registered and followed 548 Jap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iida, Osamu, Takahara, Mitsuyoshi, Soga, Yoshimitsu, Kodama, Akio, Terashi, Hiroto, Azuma, Nobuyoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005531
_version_ 1783290327123099648
author Iida, Osamu
Takahara, Mitsuyoshi
Soga, Yoshimitsu
Kodama, Akio
Terashi, Hiroto
Azuma, Nobuyoshi
author_facet Iida, Osamu
Takahara, Mitsuyoshi
Soga, Yoshimitsu
Kodama, Akio
Terashi, Hiroto
Azuma, Nobuyoshi
author_sort Iida, Osamu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND—: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between surgical reconstruction and endovascular therapy (EVT) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in today’s real-world settings. METHODS AND RESULTS—: This multicenter, prospective, observational study registered and followed 548 Japanese CLI patients. The registration was in advance of revascularization; 197 patients were scheduled to receive surgical reconstruction, and the remaining 351 were scheduled to receive EVT. The primary end point was 3-year amputation-free survival, compared between the 2 treatments in an intention-to-treat manner, using propensity score matching. Interaction analysis was additionally performed to explore which subgroups had better outcomes with surgical reconstruction or EVT. After propensity score matching, the 3-year amputation-free survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (52% [95% confidence interval, 43%–60%] and 52% [95% confidence interval, 44–60%]; P=0.26). Subsequent interaction analysis identified (1) Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification W-3, (2) fI-2/3, (3) history of ipsilateral minor amputation, (4) history of revascularization after CLI onset, and (5) bilateral CLI as the factors more favorable for surgical reconstruction, whereas (1) diabetes mellitus, (2) renal failure, (3) anemia, (4) history of nonadherence to cardiovascular risk management, and (5) contralateral major amputation were as those less favorable for surgical reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS—: The 3-year amputation-free survival was not different between surgical reconstruction and EVT in the overall CLI population. The subsequent interaction analysis suggested that there would be a subgroup more suited for surgical reconstruction and another benefiting more from EVT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/. Unique identifier: UMIN000007050.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5753823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57538232018-01-31 Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) Iida, Osamu Takahara, Mitsuyoshi Soga, Yoshimitsu Kodama, Akio Terashi, Hiroto Azuma, Nobuyoshi Circ Cardiovasc Interv Original Articles BACKGROUND—: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between surgical reconstruction and endovascular therapy (EVT) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in today’s real-world settings. METHODS AND RESULTS—: This multicenter, prospective, observational study registered and followed 548 Japanese CLI patients. The registration was in advance of revascularization; 197 patients were scheduled to receive surgical reconstruction, and the remaining 351 were scheduled to receive EVT. The primary end point was 3-year amputation-free survival, compared between the 2 treatments in an intention-to-treat manner, using propensity score matching. Interaction analysis was additionally performed to explore which subgroups had better outcomes with surgical reconstruction or EVT. After propensity score matching, the 3-year amputation-free survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (52% [95% confidence interval, 43%–60%] and 52% [95% confidence interval, 44–60%]; P=0.26). Subsequent interaction analysis identified (1) Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification W-3, (2) fI-2/3, (3) history of ipsilateral minor amputation, (4) history of revascularization after CLI onset, and (5) bilateral CLI as the factors more favorable for surgical reconstruction, whereas (1) diabetes mellitus, (2) renal failure, (3) anemia, (4) history of nonadherence to cardiovascular risk management, and (5) contralateral major amputation were as those less favorable for surgical reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS—: The 3-year amputation-free survival was not different between surgical reconstruction and EVT in the overall CLI population. The subsequent interaction analysis suggested that there would be a subgroup more suited for surgical reconstruction and another benefiting more from EVT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/. Unique identifier: UMIN000007050. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-12 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5753823/ /pubmed/29246911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005531 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Iida, Osamu
Takahara, Mitsuyoshi
Soga, Yoshimitsu
Kodama, Akio
Terashi, Hiroto
Azuma, Nobuyoshi
Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia)
title Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia)
title_full Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia)
title_fullStr Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia)
title_full_unstemmed Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia)
title_short Three-Year Outcomes of Surgical Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia: The SPINACH Study (Surgical Reconstruction Versus Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia)
title_sort three-year outcomes of surgical versus endovascular revascularization for critical limb ischemia: the spinach study (surgical reconstruction versus peripheral intervention in patients with critical limb ischemia)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005531
work_keys_str_mv AT iidaosamu threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia
AT takaharamitsuyoshi threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia
AT sogayoshimitsu threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia
AT kodamaakio threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia
AT terashihiroto threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia
AT azumanobuyoshi threeyearoutcomesofsurgicalversusendovascularrevascularizationforcriticallimbischemiathespinachstudysurgicalreconstructionversusperipheralinterventioninpatientswithcriticallimbischemia