Cargando…
Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score
Many non-experimental studies use propensity-score methods to estimate causal effects by balancing treatment and control groups on a set of observed baseline covariates. Full matching on the propensity score has emerged as a particularly effective and flexible method for utilizing all available data...
Autores principales: | Austin, Peter C, Stuart, Elizabeth A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26329750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280215601134 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes
por: Austin, Peter C, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The effect of a constraint on the maximum number of controls matched to each treated subject on the performance of full matching on the propensity score when estimating risk differences
por: Austin, Peter C., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Estimating adjusted risk differences by multiply‐imputing missing control binary potential outcomes following propensity score‐matching
por: Austin, Peter C., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Assessing the performance of the generalized propensity score for estimating the effect of quantitative or continuous exposures on binary outcomes
por: Austin, Peter C.
Publicado: (2018) -
Bootstrap vs asymptotic variance estimation when using propensity score weighting with continuous and binary outcomes
por: Austin, Peter C.
Publicado: (2022)