Cargando…

Exposure reporting disparity in Gulf War Registry–related clinical assessments

OBJECTIVES: The Gulf War Registry monitors related health conditions of veterans returning from the Persian Gulf Region. Enrollment consists of two phases: Phase I—veterans meet with their local VA Environmental Health Coordinator and complete the self-reported Gulf War Phase I Worksheet (VA Form 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metzger-Smith, Valerie, Lei, Karen, Javors, Jennifer, Golshan, Shahrokh, Leung, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29318011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312117746567
_version_ 1783290336730152960
author Metzger-Smith, Valerie
Lei, Karen
Javors, Jennifer
Golshan, Shahrokh
Leung, Albert
author_facet Metzger-Smith, Valerie
Lei, Karen
Javors, Jennifer
Golshan, Shahrokh
Leung, Albert
author_sort Metzger-Smith, Valerie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Gulf War Registry monitors related health conditions of veterans returning from the Persian Gulf Region. Enrollment consists of two phases: Phase I—veterans meet with their local VA Environmental Health Coordinator and complete the self-reported Gulf War Phase I Worksheet (VA Form 10-9009A). Phase II involves a physical exam, medical history review, and laboratory test analysis conducted by a licensed physician. The providers’ documentations are frequently referred for exposure assessment and benefit claim. We conducted an initial comparison assessment to ascertain any potential disparity in exposure reporting between the applicants in Phase I and the providers in Phase II. METHODS: With institutional human subject committee approval, a list of veterans with a Gulf War Registry electronic medical note from the VA San Diego Healthcare System (2013–2015) was obtained. Comparing Phase I with Phase II reports allows three distinct reporting group combinations for each of the 21 exposure categories. Group I: both the patients and the healthcare personnel provided the same report for the respective exposure. Group II: healthcare personnel but not the patients reported the exposure. Group III: only the patients but not the healthcare personnel reported the exposure. RESULTS: A total of 178 (of 367) subjects had both the medical note from the healthcare provider and a physical copy of their Phase I Worksheet available, and therefore were eligible to be included in the overall one-way and subsequent pair-wise chi-square analyses. The results indicate that Group I reporting pattern had a significantly (p < 0.01) lower prevalence in nine exposure categories compared to Group III. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the medical documentation from the healthcare providers does not consistently and accurately reflect the patients’ report in near 50% (9/21) of assessed exposure categories. Potential remedies addressing this exposure reporting disparity, such as a standardized template or electronic upload, are further discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5753886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57538862018-01-09 Exposure reporting disparity in Gulf War Registry–related clinical assessments Metzger-Smith, Valerie Lei, Karen Javors, Jennifer Golshan, Shahrokh Leung, Albert SAGE Open Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: The Gulf War Registry monitors related health conditions of veterans returning from the Persian Gulf Region. Enrollment consists of two phases: Phase I—veterans meet with their local VA Environmental Health Coordinator and complete the self-reported Gulf War Phase I Worksheet (VA Form 10-9009A). Phase II involves a physical exam, medical history review, and laboratory test analysis conducted by a licensed physician. The providers’ documentations are frequently referred for exposure assessment and benefit claim. We conducted an initial comparison assessment to ascertain any potential disparity in exposure reporting between the applicants in Phase I and the providers in Phase II. METHODS: With institutional human subject committee approval, a list of veterans with a Gulf War Registry electronic medical note from the VA San Diego Healthcare System (2013–2015) was obtained. Comparing Phase I with Phase II reports allows three distinct reporting group combinations for each of the 21 exposure categories. Group I: both the patients and the healthcare personnel provided the same report for the respective exposure. Group II: healthcare personnel but not the patients reported the exposure. Group III: only the patients but not the healthcare personnel reported the exposure. RESULTS: A total of 178 (of 367) subjects had both the medical note from the healthcare provider and a physical copy of their Phase I Worksheet available, and therefore were eligible to be included in the overall one-way and subsequent pair-wise chi-square analyses. The results indicate that Group I reporting pattern had a significantly (p < 0.01) lower prevalence in nine exposure categories compared to Group III. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the medical documentation from the healthcare providers does not consistently and accurately reflect the patients’ report in near 50% (9/21) of assessed exposure categories. Potential remedies addressing this exposure reporting disparity, such as a standardized template or electronic upload, are further discussed. SAGE Publications 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5753886/ /pubmed/29318011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312117746567 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Metzger-Smith, Valerie
Lei, Karen
Javors, Jennifer
Golshan, Shahrokh
Leung, Albert
Exposure reporting disparity in Gulf War Registry–related clinical assessments
title Exposure reporting disparity in Gulf War Registry–related clinical assessments
title_full Exposure reporting disparity in Gulf War Registry–related clinical assessments
title_fullStr Exposure reporting disparity in Gulf War Registry–related clinical assessments
title_full_unstemmed Exposure reporting disparity in Gulf War Registry–related clinical assessments
title_short Exposure reporting disparity in Gulf War Registry–related clinical assessments
title_sort exposure reporting disparity in gulf war registry–related clinical assessments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5753886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29318011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312117746567
work_keys_str_mv AT metzgersmithvalerie exposurereportingdisparityingulfwarregistryrelatedclinicalassessments
AT leikaren exposurereportingdisparityingulfwarregistryrelatedclinicalassessments
AT javorsjennifer exposurereportingdisparityingulfwarregistryrelatedclinicalassessments
AT golshanshahrokh exposurereportingdisparityingulfwarregistryrelatedclinicalassessments
AT leungalbert exposurereportingdisparityingulfwarregistryrelatedclinicalassessments