Cargando…

Quantitative systems toxicology

The overarching goal of modern drug development is to optimize therapeutic benefits while minimizing adverse effects. However, inadequate efficacy and safety concerns remain to be the major causes of drug attrition in clinical development. For the past 80 years, toxicity testing has consisted of eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bloomingdale, Peter, Housand, Conrad, Apgar, Joshua F., Millard, Bjorn L., Mager, Donald E., Burke, John M., Shah, Dhaval K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29308440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2017.07.003
_version_ 1783290357010661376
author Bloomingdale, Peter
Housand, Conrad
Apgar, Joshua F.
Millard, Bjorn L.
Mager, Donald E.
Burke, John M.
Shah, Dhaval K.
author_facet Bloomingdale, Peter
Housand, Conrad
Apgar, Joshua F.
Millard, Bjorn L.
Mager, Donald E.
Burke, John M.
Shah, Dhaval K.
author_sort Bloomingdale, Peter
collection PubMed
description The overarching goal of modern drug development is to optimize therapeutic benefits while minimizing adverse effects. However, inadequate efficacy and safety concerns remain to be the major causes of drug attrition in clinical development. For the past 80 years, toxicity testing has consisted of evaluating the adverse effects of drugs in animals to predict human health risks. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recognized the need to develop innovative toxicity testing strategies and asked the National Research Council to develop a long-range vision and strategy for toxicity testing in the 21st century. The vision aims to reduce the use of animals and drug development costs through the integration of computational modeling and in vitro experimental methods that evaluates the perturbation of toxicity-related pathways. Towards this vision, collaborative quantitative systems pharmacology and toxicology modeling endeavors (QSP/QST) have been initiated amongst numerous organizations worldwide. In this article, we discuss how quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), network-based, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling approaches can be integrated into the framework of QST models. Additionally, we review the application of QST models to predict cardiotoxicity and hepatotoxicity of drugs throughout their development. Cell and organ specific QST models are likely to become an essential component of modern toxicity testing, and provides a solid foundation towards determining individualized therapeutic windows to improve patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5754001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57540012018-01-04 Quantitative systems toxicology Bloomingdale, Peter Housand, Conrad Apgar, Joshua F. Millard, Bjorn L. Mager, Donald E. Burke, John M. Shah, Dhaval K. Curr Opin Toxicol Article The overarching goal of modern drug development is to optimize therapeutic benefits while minimizing adverse effects. However, inadequate efficacy and safety concerns remain to be the major causes of drug attrition in clinical development. For the past 80 years, toxicity testing has consisted of evaluating the adverse effects of drugs in animals to predict human health risks. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recognized the need to develop innovative toxicity testing strategies and asked the National Research Council to develop a long-range vision and strategy for toxicity testing in the 21st century. The vision aims to reduce the use of animals and drug development costs through the integration of computational modeling and in vitro experimental methods that evaluates the perturbation of toxicity-related pathways. Towards this vision, collaborative quantitative systems pharmacology and toxicology modeling endeavors (QSP/QST) have been initiated amongst numerous organizations worldwide. In this article, we discuss how quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), network-based, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling approaches can be integrated into the framework of QST models. Additionally, we review the application of QST models to predict cardiotoxicity and hepatotoxicity of drugs throughout their development. Cell and organ specific QST models are likely to become an essential component of modern toxicity testing, and provides a solid foundation towards determining individualized therapeutic windows to improve patient safety. 2017-08-02 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5754001/ /pubmed/29308440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2017.07.003 Text en This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bloomingdale, Peter
Housand, Conrad
Apgar, Joshua F.
Millard, Bjorn L.
Mager, Donald E.
Burke, John M.
Shah, Dhaval K.
Quantitative systems toxicology
title Quantitative systems toxicology
title_full Quantitative systems toxicology
title_fullStr Quantitative systems toxicology
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative systems toxicology
title_short Quantitative systems toxicology
title_sort quantitative systems toxicology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29308440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2017.07.003
work_keys_str_mv AT bloomingdalepeter quantitativesystemstoxicology
AT housandconrad quantitativesystemstoxicology
AT apgarjoshuaf quantitativesystemstoxicology
AT millardbjornl quantitativesystemstoxicology
AT magerdonalde quantitativesystemstoxicology
AT burkejohnm quantitativesystemstoxicology
AT shahdhavalk quantitativesystemstoxicology